You are here

Panteizm ve Panenteizm Tartışmaları Arasında Spinoza

Spinoza between Pantheism and Panentheism Discussions

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
In this article examines whether Spinoza was a pantheist or not as it widely accepted. When it was considered interpreta-tions of Spinoza’s commentators and philosophy historians, he could be supposed to be pantheist in general. Nonwithstanding, when considering Spinoza’s works first hand, it is pointed out that naming his system as panentheism instead of pantheism is more feasible.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makalede, yaygın olarak kabul edildiği gibi Spinoza’nın bir panteist olup olmadığı irdelenmektedir. Spinoza yorumcuları-nın ve felsefe tarihçilerinin yorumlarına bakıldığında, onun genel-likle panteist olduğu varsayılabilir. Buna karşın Spinoza’nın doğru-dan kendi eserleri esas alındığında, onun sistemini panteizm yerine panenteizm olarak adlandırmanın daha uygun olacağı belirtilmek-tedir.
17-32

REFERENCES

References: 

Adıvar, A.A. (1980). Bilim ve Din (İlim ve Din). İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
Arıcan, M.K. (2001). Akıl İman İlişkisine Spinoza’nın Yaklaşımı. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5 (2).
Arıcan, M.K. (2004). Spinoza’nın Natura Naturans ve Natura Naturata Kavramla-rının Anlamsal İçeriği Üzerine Tartışmalar. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 4 (4).
Arıcan, M.K. (2006). Spinoza’nın Tanrı-Alem İlişkisinde İçkinli-Aşkınlık Prob-lemi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 10 (1).
Armour, L. (1992). Being and Idea: Developments of Some Themes in Spinoza and Hegel. New York: Georg Olms Verlag.
Bayrakdar, M. (1996). Spinoza’nın Natura Naturans ve Natura Naturata Kavram-larının İslami Kökenleri. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, XL.
Ben Shlomo, Y. (1991). Substance and Attributes in the Short Treatise and in the Ethics: An Attempt at an ‘Existentialist’ Interpretation. God and Nature: Spi-noza’s Metaphysics (ed. Y. Yovel). Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Bennett, J. (1991). Spinoza’s Monism: A Reply to Curley. God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (ed. Y. Yovel). Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Bennett, J. (1996). Spinoza’s Metaphysics. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza (ed. D. Garrett). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caird, J. (1888) Spinoza, UMI, Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Cassirer, E. The Myth of The State. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
Curley, E. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Cambridge: Har-vard University Press.
Curley, E. (1991). On Bennett’s Interpretation of Spinoza’s Monism. God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics (ed. Y. Yovel). Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical Philosophy (trans. R. Hurley). San Francisco: City Lights Books.
Erdem, H. (1990). Panteizm ve Vahdet-i Vücud Mukayesesi. Ankara: Kültür ve Tu-rizm Bakanlığı Yayınları.
Garrett, D. (1996). Introduction. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza (ed. D. Gar-rett). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Garvie, A.E. (1951). Pantheism. Encyclopædie of Religion and Ethics (ed. J. Hastings), Vol. IX. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Gökberk, M. (1990). Felsefe Tarihi. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
B e y t u l h i k m e 3 ( 1 ) 2013
B e y t u l h i k m e A n I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l o f P h i l o s o p h y
31
Panteizm ve Panenteizm Tartışmaları Arasında Spinoza
Hampshire, S. (1951). Spinoza. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Harris, E.E. (1992). Spinoza’s Philosophy: An Outline. London: Humanities Press.
Hartshorne, C. (1964). Man’s Vision of God and the Logic of Theism. Hamden: Arc-hon Books.
Hartshorne, C. and W.L.Reese. Philosophers Speak of God. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1996). Felsefi Bilimler Ansiklopedisi 1: Mantık Bilimi (çev. A. Yar-dımlı). İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi.
Hutton, S. (1996). Edward Stillingfleet and Spinoza. Disguised and Overt Spinozism Around 1700 (ed. W. van Bunge and W. Klever). Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Joachim, H.H. (1901). A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Korlaelçi, M. (1992). Panteizm ile Vahdet-i Vücudun Mukayesesi. Türk Kültürü ve Felsefe Panelleri. Kayseri: Erciyes Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Levine, M.P. (1994). Pantheism. London and New York: Routledge.
Mason, R. (1997). The God of Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mason, R. (1998). Reducing Religion: The Case of Spinoza. Teology, 800.
Moreau, P.-F. (1996). Spinoza’s Reception and Influence (trans. R. Ariew). The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza (ed. D. Garrett). New York: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
Parkinson, G.H.R. (1954). Spinoza’s Theory of Knowledge. London: Clarendon Press.
Pereboom, D. (1994). Stoic Psychotherapy in Descartes and Spinoza. Faith and Philosophy, 11 (4).
Pollock, S.F. (1899). Spinoza: His Life and Philosophy. London: Duckworth & Co.
Resullerin İşleri (1997). Kitabı Mukaddes. İstanbul: Kitabı Mukaddes Şirketi.
Scruton, R. (1986). Spinoza, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spinoza, B. (1934). Ethics (trans. A. Boyle). Sheridan, OR: Heron Books
Spinoza, B. (1961). Principles of Cartesian Philosophy (trans. H.E. Wedeck). New York: Philosophical Library.
Spinoza, B. (1966). The Correspondence of Spinoza (ed. A. Wolf). New York: Russell & Russell, Inc.
Spinoza, B. (1984). Etika (çev. H.Z. Ülken). İstanbul: Ülken Yayınları.
Strauss, L. (1965). Spinoza’s Critique of Religion (trans. E.M. Sinclair). New York: Schocken Books.
Stumpf, S.E. (1989). Philosophy: History and Problems. New York: McGrow-Hill, Inc.
B e y t u l h i k m e 3 ( 1 ) 2013
B e y t u l h i k m e A n I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l o f P h i l o s o p h y
Musa Kazım Arıcan
32
Thissen, S. (1996). Images of Light and Shadow: Spinozism Bursts Forth into Dutch Cultural Life. Disguised and Overt Spinozism Around 1700 (ed. W. van Bunge and W. Klever). Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com