You are here

Sosyal Bilimler Lisansüstü Programlarında Epistemolojik Çeşitlilik: Çek Cumhuriyeti’ndeki Bir Amerikan Kolejinin Deneyimi

Epistemological Diversity in Social Science Graduate Curriculum: The Experience from an American College in Czech Republic

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The insufficient coverage of philosophy of science and epistemological discussion in graduate curriculum has been a sub-ject of criticism among several scholars. In this article, I examine the ways through which the MA curriculum in International Rela-tions in an American college in Czech Republic was restructured toward a meaningful representation of different epistemological approaches. The restructuration of the program comes as a result of the university’s search for legitimacy in a post-communist socie-ty. Similar to its peers in Central and Eastern Europe, the universi-ty is enforced to increase its quality in teaching. It does so through introducing participatory curriculum committees where faculty members from different epistemological backgrounds gather. The experience shows that such participatory mechanisms in universi-ties are essential to give space for philosophy of science debates in graduate curriculum.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Sosyal bilimlerde lisansüstü müfredatın yeterli derecede bilim felsefesi ve epistemolojik tartışma içermemesi bir çok kez eleştiri konusu olmuştur. Bu makalede, Çek Cumhuriyetindeki bir Ameri-kan kolejinde yer alan Uluslararası Ilişkiler yükseklisans pro-gramının farklı epistemolojik yaklaşımları içerecek şekilde nasıl geliştiği incelenmektedir. Müfredatın yeniden yapılandırılması, ün-iversitenin komünizm sonrası toplumda meşruiyet arayışının bir sonucu olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Orta ve Doğu Avrupa’daki mua-dillerine benzer bir şekilde, öğretim kalitesini artırma zorunluluğu içinde olan üniversite, farklı epistemolojik yaklaşımlardan gelen öğretim üyelerinin katıldığı program komiteleri oluşturmuştur. Bu deneyim göstermektedir ki, üniversitelerin katılımcı platformlar oluşturmaları, bilim felsefesinde yer alan tartışmaların lisansüstü programlarda daha etkin yer almasını sağlamaktadır.
47
57

REFERENCES

References: 

Galbraith, K. (2003). Towards Quality Private Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 28 (4), 539-559.
Mayer, L. (2002). The Centrality of Epistemology in Methodology Education. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35 (1), 121-125.
Pachuashvili, M. (2007). Legitimacy Sources and Private Growth in the Post-Communist Context. Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe in Search for Legitimacy (eds. S. Slantcheva & D. C. Levy). New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 75-94.
Reisz, R. D. (2003). Public Policy for Private Higher Education in Central and
Be y t u l h i k m e 5 ( 1 ) 2 0 1 5
B e y t u l h i k m e A n I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l o f P h i l o s o p h y
57
Epistemological Diversity in Social Science Graduate Curriculum
Eastern Europe. Conceptual Clarifications, Statistical Evidence, Open Questions. HoF Arbeitsbericht. Wittenberg: Institute for Higher Education Research at the Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg.
Slantcheva, S. (2007). Legitimating the Difference: Private Higher Education Institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe in Search for Legitimacy (eds. S. Slantcheva & D. C. Levy). New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 55-74.
Schwartz-Shea, P. (2003). Is This the Curriculum We Want? Doctoral Require-ments and Offerings in Methods and Methodology. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36 (3), 379-386.
Weber, M. 1946 [1922]. Science as Vocation. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (eds. H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills). New York: Oxford University Press, 129-156.
Wenninger, A. (2010). Social Sciences in Central and Eastern Europe: Insti-tutonal Landscapes. Internationalization of Social Sciences in Central and Eastern Europe (eds. I. P. Kov & I. Palne & D. Kutsar). New York: Routledge, 85-98.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com