You are here

Belge Yönetiminde Program Geliştirme: Belge Yönetimi Kapasite Değerlendirme Sistemi

Program Development at the Records Management: Records Management Capacity Assessment System

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The evaluation of the institutional condition is so important to create effective and continuous systems and analysis of the existing capacity in administrative bodies and records management applications is regarded as crucial. Within this respect, an evaluation of both international and national and an analysis of the existing conditions in records management are necessary. In this study, the programs that were developed for records management and Records Management Capacity Assessment System are evaluated order to identify the conditions and problems in institutional records management.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Belge yönetimi çalışmalarının etkinliği ve sürekliliğini sağlamada kurumsal değerlendirmelerin yapılması, kurum içerisinde idari yapı ve belge uygulamalarına yönelik var olan kapasitenin analiz edilmesi oldukça önemli görülmektedir. Bu kapsamda belge yönetimi alanında uluslararası ve ulusal koşulların değerlendirilmesi, belge işlemlerinde var olan durumu tanımlamak için analizlerin yapılması gerekmektedir. Çalışma kapsamında kurumsal belge işlemlerini etkileyen koşulları ve sorunları tespit etmek amacıyla geliştirilen programlar ve Belge Yönetimi Kapasite Değerlendirme Sistemi değerlendirilmektedir.



Australian Society of Archivists. (2005). New tools from the international records management. Electronic
Records Special Intererst Group Newsletter. 7 Eylül 2007 tarihinde
adresinden erişildi.
Belge Yönetiminde Program Geliştirme BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2009, 10 (2)
Baret, L. L. (2005). Implementation of electronic quality records management system in a midsize
aerospace manufacturer. Master of Science in Quality Assurance. California State University
Dominguez Hill.
Brown, A. D. (1998). Organizational culture ( Edinburgh: Prentice Hall.
Brumm, E. K. (1992). Graduate education in records management: The University of Texas Model. The
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 3(4), 333-337.
Chibambo, M. L. N. (2003). Records management: the key to good governance and sustainable
development. XVII BIENNIAL Eastern and Southern Africa Regional of Branch of the International
Council on Archives (ESARBICA) General Conference on Archives, Society and Good
Governance. Mozambique Maputo. 3 Eylül 2007 tarihinde
docs/marion.pdf adresinden erişildi.
Cisco, S. L. ve Strong, K. V. (1999). The value added information chain. Information Management
Journal, 33(1), 4-15.
Cox, R. J. (1995). University of Pittsburg functional requirements project: reports and working papers
progress report two. Pittsburg: School of Library and Information.
Demp, S. (2004). An Introduction to records management capacity assessment system (RMCAS).
Esarbicas Newsletter, October, 8-13.
Dollar, C. M. (2002). Authentic electronic records: strategies for long term access. Chicago: Cohasset
Griffin, A. (2004). Records management capacity assessment system (RMCAS). Archival Science, 4,
Handy , C. B. (1993). Understanding organizations ( Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoyle, M. (2005). Records management improvement programme-Siera Leone. ACARM Newsletter,
36, 1-2.
Hutchinson, B. V. (1996). Records and information management in California Counties. University of
La Verne School of Organizational Management Departmen of Public Administration. For the
degree doctor of Public Administration.
Information Management Planning. (2005). Government of Alberta Information Management Branch.
3 Eylül 2007 tarihinde adresinden
International Records Management Trust. (2004). Records management capacity assessment system.
3 Eylül 2007 tarihinde; adresinden
International Records Management Trust . (2005). Records management capacity assessment
system: user guide version 1,4. 3 Eylül 2007 tarihinde
documentation/rmcas_user_guide.pdf adresinden erişildi.
BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2009, 10 (2) Özgür KÜLCÜ, Hande UZUN KÜLCÜ
International Records Management Trust. (2006). Integrating Records Management Requirements
into Financial Management Information Systems. 3 Eylül 2007 tarihinde
download/DOCUME~1/DEVELO~1/RESEAR~1/IFMISGuide.pdf adresinden erişildi.
InterPARES 2 Project. (2007). The International Research on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic
Systems, 6 Ekim 2007 tarihinde adresinden erişildi.
ISO 15489-1. (2001). International Records Management Standard. Switzerland: ISO/TC 46 Technical
Committee:1-11. 17.02.2006 tarihinde http//
TR_15489-1.pdf adresinden erişildi.
Kavrakoğlu, İ. (1995). Kalite (Cep Kitabı). İstanbul: Kal-Der.
Library and Archives of Canada. (2003). Information management capacity check; tools and methodology.
3 Eylül 2007 tarihinde
2003-e.html adresinden erişildi.
Library of Congress. (2007). Importance of digital preservation. 6 Ekim 2007 tarihinde http://www. adresinden erişildi.
Munro, K. D. M. (2005). Electronic records as a corporate risk: Internet service providers, personal
information and lawful access. University of Toronto Graduate Department of Faculty of Law.
Doctorial Degree.
O’Brien, J. J. (1999). Factors for influence organizational context and leadership in recorded information
management. Royal Roads University:Master of Arts in Leadership and Training.
Özveren, M. (1997). Toplam kalite yönetimi: temel kavramlar ve uygulamalar. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
Penn, I. A., Mordel, A. ve Pennix, G. (1994). Record management handbook. Gower: Kelvin Smith.
Pheysey, S. P. (1993). Organizational cultures: types and transformations. London: Routledge.
Records Management Capacity Assessment System. (2007). National Archives of England web
sitesinden 22 Agustos 2007 tarihinde adresinden
Robek, M. F. ve Stephens, D. O. (1995). Information and records management: document-based
information systems ( Glenceo: McGraw-Hill.
Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behaviors ( New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Saunders, J. B. (1990). Words and phrases legally defined. Boston: Butterworths.
Senn, J. A.(1989). Analysis and design of information systems ( New York: McGraw-Hill.
Shellenberg, T. R. (1956). Modern archives: principles and techniques. Chicago: F.W. Cheshire.
Shepherd, E. ve Geoffrey Y. (2003). Managing records: a handbook of principles and practices. London:
Facet Publishing.
Belge Yönetiminde Program Geliştirme BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2009, 10 (2)
Spratt, R. (2004). Records management: the next ten years. RDIMS (Records, Documents and Image
Management Systems). Canadian Federal Government Shared System Initiative. 8 Haziran
2006 tarihinde
NextTenYears.doc adresinden erişildi.
Stanescu, A. (2004). Assessing the durability of formats in a digital preservation environment: The
INFORM methodology. D-Lib Magazine, November, 10-11.
Stephens, D. O. (2001). Megatrends in international records management. Information Management
Journal, 35(4), 66-70.
Thurston, A. (2005). “Fostering trust and transparency through information systems”. ACARM
Newsletter, 36, 1-5.
Veitch, M. (2003). Effective data management: the legal and best practice requirement for keeping data.
6 Eylül 2007 tarihinde adresinden
Walters, T. O. (1995). Rediscovering the theoretical base of records management and its implications
for graduate education: searching for the new School of Information Studies. Journal of Education
for Library and Information Science, 36(2), 139-154.
Williams, R. F. (2002). Realizing the need and putting the key components in place to getting it right in
records management. Maryland: AIIM International.
Zaman, R., Claude,Y ve Anderson, P. (2003). Overview of the information management capacity
check. 17 Eylül 2009 tarihinde
eng.pdf adresinden erişildi.
Zawiyah, M. Y ve Chell, R. W. (2002). Towards a theoretical construct for records management.
Records Management Journal, 12(2), 55-64.

Thank you for copying data from