You are here

Home » Content

Küresel Krizin Aşılmasında Alternatif Bir Yol: Sosyal Sermayede Enformasyon Edinimi ve Kullanım Kapasitesi

An Alternative Way in Overcoming Global Crisis: Information Acquiring in the Social Capital and Capacity Usage

Journal Name:

  • Bilgi Dünyası

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Intellectual capital, intangible assets of an organization mobilizing the resources it provides long-term life and do not appear in the balance sheet as assets as defi ned, information is based on a new type of capital. Patents and trademarks of the organization has received the organization’sreputation, customer loyalty, such as abstract elements, in other words, information, and such assets are shown as are the basis of the capital. These assets, intellectual capital is separated into three basic components. The fi rst, is the human capital and employee organizations of past experience, business skills refers to. Second, structural capital and the organization’s culture and structure had settled into the habit of doing business and professionalism includes. Third, the relational or social capital and intellectual capital is the most important component. This type of capital, do business with organizations around the connection with other organizations that is based on. A social network, this mechanism contained in the bonds of members based on their capacity utilization means that they created. Actors within this network mechanism, the organization itself or the units can take an active role. This study, to companies aff ected by the global crisis, the crisis of social capital as a way out of a capacity to off er tips and suggestions for how could be increased. For this reason, study, an alternative approach as a means fi rms can exit from the crisis of social networking mechanism for how confi gurations and relational capital, how and in what form of action needed, the basic problematically respectively.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Entelektüel sermaye; bir örgütün soyut varlıklarını harekete geçirerek, ona uzun dönemli yaşam kaynağı sağlayan ve bilânçolarında görünmeyen varlıklar olarak tanımlanan, bilgiye dayalı yeni bir sermaye türüdür. Örgütün aldığı patentler ve ticari markalar, örgütün itibarı, müşteri bağlılığı gibi unsurlar soyut, diğer bir deyişle bilgi varlıkları olarak gösterilmekte ve bu tür sermayenin temelini teşkil etmektedir. Bu varlıklar, entelektüel sermayeyi üç temel bileşene ayırmaktadır. Bunlardan ilki; insan sermayesidir ve örgüt çalışanının geçmiş tecrübelerine, iş yapma becerilerine atıfta bulunmaktadır. İkincisi olan, yapısal sermaye örgütün kültürü ve yapısı içerisine yerleşmiş iş yapma alışkanlığını ve profesyonelliğini içermektedir. Üçüncüsü ise ilişkisel veya sosyal sermayedir ve entelektüel sermayenin en önemli bileşendir. Bu sermaye türü, örgütün çevresinde birlikte iş yaptığı diğer örgütlerle olan bağlantısına dayanmaktadır. Sosyal bir ağ, bu düzenek içerisinde bulunan üyelerin bağlarına dayalı oluşturdukları kapasite kullanımı demektir. Bu ağ düzeneği içerisinde aktörler, örgütün kendisi veya birimler etkin rol alabilmektedir. Bu çalışma; küresel krizden etkilenen fi rmalara, krizden çıkış yolu olarak sosyal sermayeyi kullanma kapasitesinin nasıl artırılabileceğine yönelik ipuçları ve öneriler sunmaktadır. Bu nedenle araştırmada, alternatif bir yaklaşım yolu olarak fi rmaların krizden çıkabilmeleri için sosyal ağ düzeneklerini nasıl yapılandırmaları, ilişkisel sermayelerini nasıl ve ne şekilde harekete geçirmeleri gerektiği, temel sorunsal olarak saptanmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kuresel-krizin-asilmasinda-alternatif-bir-yol-sosyal-sermayede-enformasyon-edinimi-kullanim-kapasitesi.pdf
  • 1
140-154
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alavi, M. (2000). Managing organizational knowledge. R.W. Zmud (Ed.) Framing the domains of IT
management projecting the future through the past içinde (ss.15-28). Cincinnati, OH: Pinnafl ex
Education Resources, Inc.
Ariely, G. (2006). Intellectual capital and knowledge management. D. Schwartz (Der.) Encyclopedia
of Knowledge Management içinde (ss.281-288). London: Idea Group Reference.
Arıduru, A. Kriz nedir? Ne değildir? 5 Ocak 2010 tarihinde http://www.fortune.com.tr/kriznedir.asp
adresinden erişildi.
152
BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2010, 11 (1) 140-154 Mustafa SAĞSAN, Recep YÜCEL, Cenk SÖZEN
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,
17, 99-120.
Barney, J.(1997). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Barney, J. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
Bart, C. (2001). Measuring the mission eff ect in human intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual
Capital Research, 2(3), 320-330.
Beckert, J. (2003). Economic sociology and embeddedness: How shall we conceptualize economic
action? Journal of Economic Issues, 37 (3), 769-787.
Bergeron, B. (2003). Essentials of knowledge management. NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Bontis, N. (2001). Assessing knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual
capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 41-61.
Bontis, N. (2002). The rising star of the Chief Knowledge Offi cer. Ivey Business Journal, March/April,
20-25
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of capital. J. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for
the Sociology of Education içinde (ss.241-258). New York : Greenwood Press.
Bueno, E.; Salmador, P.M. ve Rodriguez, O. (2004). The role of social capital in today’s economy.
Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5 (4), 556-574.
Bukowitz, W. ve Williams, R. (2000). The knowledge management fi eldbook. London: Printice Hall.
Burt, S. R. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
Burt, S.R. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-
365.
Burt, S.R. (2005). Brokerage and closure. New York: Oxford University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology,
94, 95-120.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dierickx, I., ve Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive
advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504-1511.
Edvinsson, L., ve Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital. New York: Harper Business.
Edvinson, L., Sullivan, P. (1996). Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European
Management Journal, 14 (14).
Ercan, M.; Öztürk, B. ve Demirgüneş, K. (2003). Değere dayalı yönetim ve entelektüel sermaye. Ankara:
Gazi Kitabevi.
Flamant, M. ve Singer-Kerel, J . (1970). Crises et récessions économiques. P.U.F.,Paris.
Gargiulo, M. ve Benassi, M. (2000). Traped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes,
and the adaptation of social capital. Organization Science, 11 (2): 183-196.
Granovetter, M. (1973). Strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory,
1, 201-233.
153
Küresel Krizin Aşılmasında Alternatif Bir Yol BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2010, 11 (1) 140-154
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.
American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions: A framework for analysis.
Acta Sociologica, 35 (3), 3-11.
Granovetter, M. ve Swedberg, R. (1992). The sociology of economic life. San Fransisco: Westview
Press.
Hazleton, V. ve Kennan, W. (2000). Social capital: Reconceptualizing the botttom line. Corporate
Communication: An International Journal, 5 (2), 81-86.
Hunt, S. D. (2000). A general theory of competition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jennex, M.E. ve Croasdell, D. (2007). Knowledge management as a discipline. (Murray E. Jennex
Ed.) Knowledge Management in Modern Organization içinde (ss. 10-17). Hershey, London: Idea
Group publishing.
Kaplan, R. ve Norton, D. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston:
Harvard Business School.
Kaplan, R. S., ve Norton, D.P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance.
Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb.
Klein, D. A ve Prusak, L. (1994). Characterising intellectual capital. Cambridge, MA, Centre for
Business Innovation, Ernst and Young.
Koenig, M. E. D. (1999). Education knowledge management. Information Services and Use, 19, 17-31.
Leana, R. C. ve Buren, V. H. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices.
Academy of Management Review, 24 (3), 538-555.
McElroy, M. (1999). The knowledge life cycle. ICM Conference on KM, Miami: FL.
Meyer, M. ve Zack, M. (1996). The design and implementation of information products. Sloan
Management Review, 37(3), 49-59.
Mykytyn, K., Bordoloi, B., Mckinney, V., ve Bandyopadhyay, K. (2002). The role of software patents
in sustaining IT-enabled competitive advantage: A call for research. Journal of Strategic
Information Systems,11, 59-82.
Nonaka, I. ve Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create
the dynamics of innovation. New York, Oxford: Oxford University press.
Nonaka, I. (2002). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. C.W. Choo ve N. Bontis
(Ed.), The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge içinde
New York: Oxford University Press.
Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment.
American Journal of Sociology, 105 (1), 88-127.
Pike, S., Rylander, A., ve Roos, G. (2002). Intellectual capital: Management and disclosure. C.W.
Choo ve N. Bontis (Ed.). The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational
knowledge içinde New York: Oxford University Press.
Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. The American Journal of
Sociology, 107 (1), 33-60.
Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
154
Sağsan, M. (2007). Knowledge management from application to discipline: A fi eld study. Amme
İdaresi Dergisi, 40 (4), 103-131.
Sağsan, M. (2009). Knowledge management discipline: Test for an undergraduate program in
Turkey. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 7 (5), 627-636, 5 Mart 2010 tarihinde
http://www.ejkm.com/volume-7/v7-5/v7-i5-art9.htm adresinden erişildi.
Sattar, A. ve Higgins, S. E. (2001). Perspectives on education for knowledge management, 67th
IFLA Council and General Conference, 16-25 August, 1-9.
Schwartz, D. G. (2007). A birds-eye view of knowledge management: Creating a disciplined whole
from many interdisciplinary parts. Murray E. Jennex (Ed.), Knowledge Management in Modern
Organization içinde (ss. 18-29), Hershey, London: Idea Group Publishing.
Sözen, C. (2007). Bağlam kapsamında örgütlerarası ağ düzenekleri: Dayanıklı ev aletleri sektörü
örneği. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara: Başkent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Yönetim ve Organizasyon Anabilim Dalı.
Stankosky, M. A. (Ed.) (2005). Advance in knowledge management: University research toward a
discipline. Creating the discipline of knowledge management: The latest in university research
içinde (ss. 1-14). Oxford: Elsevier.
Steward, T. A. (1997). Entelektüel sermaye: Örgütlerin yeni zenginliği. İstanbul: MESS yayınları.
Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge-based
assets. SanFrancisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Sveiby, K. E. (1998). Intellectual capital: Thinking ahead. Australian CPA .
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance
of organizations: the network eff ect. American Sociological Review, 61 (4), 674-698.
Uzzi, B. (1999). Embeddedness in the making of fi nancial capital: How social relations and networks
benefi t fi rms seeking fi nancing. American Sociological Review, 481-505.
Uzzi, B. ve Lanchester, R. (2003). Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan
managers and their clients. Management Science, 49 (4), 383-389.
Uzzi, B. ve Lanchester, R. (2004). Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law market.
American Sociological Review, 69, 319-344.
Van Buren, M.E. (1999). A yardstick for knowledge management. Training and Development, 53,
71-78.
Wiig, K. (1993). Knowledge Management Foundations. Arlington, TX: Schema press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com