You are here

West Indies Universitesi (UWI) Mona Kampüsü’nde Tarım ve Gıda E-Kaynakların Kullanımı

Agricultural and Food E-Resources Usage at the University of the West Indies (UWI) Mona Campus

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
An analysis of selected agricultural and food e-resources at UWI Mona Campus indicate only a small percentage of students and lecturers are utilizing these. These statistics are alarming for a number of reasons, namely: (a) the high cost of these e-resources; (b) the value in e-resources as posited by authors; (c) the reality that e-resources are a feature of the Web 2.0 age in which we currently reside; (d) and quality reviewers’ and accreditation board members’ expectations of universities to provide e-resources. If it is that e-resources are so valuable and are a feature of the Web 2.0 era and yet they are being underutilized, this has clear implications for research throughput in respect of such matters as: term papers, lectures and publications in agricultural and food sciences. Additionally, the low usage threatens the viability of continuing the provision of these e-resources at UWI. Using the UWI Mona Campus population this paper seeks to provide an understanding of the reasons for the current usage patterns; the implications for collection management as well as for research throughput; and the ways in which greater usage can be encouraged.
Abstract (Original Language): 
UWI Mona Kampüsü’nde seçilmiş tarım ve gıda e-kaynaklarının kullanım analizi , öğrencilerin ve öğretim elemanlarının sadece küçük bir yüzdesi bu kaynaklardan yararlandığını göstermektedir. Çalışmada sunulan istatistiki veriler; (a) İlgili e-kaynakların yüksek maliyeti; (b) yazarlar tarafından seçilen e-kaynakların değeri; (c) E-kaynakların şu anda içinde bulunduğumuz Web 2.0 çağının özelliklerini taşıması; (d) ve kalite kontrolü ve akreditasyon kurulu üyelerinin e-kaynak tedariğinde üniversitelerden beklentileri açılarından önem taşımaktadır. Bu e-kaynakların Web 2.0 çağının gerektirdiği özellikte olmasına karşın az kullanılması, tarım ve gıda bilimleri alanında dönem ödevlerini, ders materyallerini ve genel olarak yayınları acık bir şekilde etkilemektedir. Ayrıca, düşük kullanım UWI’de ilgili e-kaynakların sağlanmasında sürekliliği tehdit etmektedir. Bu araştırma UWI Mona Kampüsünde ilgili e-kaynakların mevcut kullanım durumu, derme yönetimi, araştırma verimi ve daha fazla kullanımı teşvik etmek için yapılması gerekenler üzerine genel bir bakış sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.
141-162

REFERENCES

References: 

Atilgan, D., & Bayram, O. G. (2006). Perspectives on an evaluation of faculty use of the digital library
at Ankara University, Turkey. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(1), 86–93.
Bancroft, A.F., Croft, V.F., Speth, R., & Philips, D.M. (1998). A forward looking library use survey: WSU
libraries in the 21st century. Journal of American Librarianship, 24, 216-224.
Bar-Ilan, J., & Fink, N. (2005). Preference for electronic format of scientific journals-a case study of
the science library users at the Hebrew University. Library and Information Science Research,
27(3), 363-376.
Bar-llan, J., Peritz, B.C. & Wolman, Y. (2003). A survey on the use of electronic databases and
electronic journals accessed through the Web by the academic staff of Israeli Universities.
Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(6), 346–361.
Bell, S. (2004). The infodiet: How libraries can offer an appetizing alternative to Google. The
Chronicle of Higher Education, 50(24). Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/
Brophy, J., & Bawden, D. (2005). Is Google enough? Comparison of an Internet search
engine with academic library resources. Aslib Proceedings 57(6), 498-512. Retrieved from
http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/~dbawden/bawden%20and%20brophy 20ap.pdf
Coombs, K. A. (2005). Lessons learned from analyzing library database usage data. Library Hi Tech,
23(4), 598-609.
Dewald, N.H., & Silvius, M.A. (2005). Business faculty research: Satisfaction with the Web versus
library databases. Libraries and the Academy, 5(3), 313-328.
Dilek-Kayaoglu, H. (2008). Use of electronic journals by faculty at Istanbul University,
Turkey: The results of a survey. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(3), 239- 247.
Fast, K.V., & Campbell, G.D. (2004). “I still like Google”: University student perceptions of searching
OPACs and the web by: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology, 41(1), 138-146. doi:10.1002/meet.1450410 116
Griffiths, J.R., & Brophy P. (2005). Student searching behavior and the Web: Use of academic
resources and Google. Library Trends, 53(4), 539-554.
Law, M., Hemmasi H. & Baxmeyer J. (2012). Library review: University of the West Indies, July 2012.
Kingston, Jamaica.
162
BİLGİ DÜNYASI, 2013, 14 (1) 141-162 Sasekea Yoneka HARRIS
Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College. (2012). Faculty advisory council memorandum on
journal pricing: Major periodical subscriptions cannot be sustained. Retrieved from http://
isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k77982&tabgroupid=icb.tabgroup143448prm/
weekly/v50/i24/24b01501.htm
Salisbury, L., Laincz, J. & Smith, J.J. (2012). Students’ preferences in selecting information resources
used to find scholarly information: A comparative study between undergraduate and
graduate students. Journal of Agriculture & Food Information, 13(3), 250-266.
Sample, I. (2012, April 24). Harvard University says it can’t afford journal publishers’ prices. The
Guardian. Retrieved from http://gu.com/p/375vj/em.
Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Boyce, P., Grayson, M., Zhang, Y. & Ebuen, M. (2003). Patterns of journal
use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-Lib Magazine, 9. Retrieved from http://
www.dlib.org/dlib/may03/king/05king.html
Yue, P.W. & Syring M.L. (2004). Usage of electronic journals and their effect on interlibrary loan:
A case study at the University of Nevada, Reno. Library Collections, Acquisitions & Technical
Services, 28, 420–432.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com