You are here

BİLGİ YÖNETİM SÜRECİ VE TEKNOLOJİ CAPACITYIN SOSYAL BİLİMLER ARAŞTIRMA AĞI

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROCESS AND TECHNOLOGY CAPACITYIN A SOCIAL SCIENCES NETWORK RESEARCH

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
We understand KM (Knowledge Management) as a strategic process to promote, create and transform the competitive capacity in all kind of organization through diverse knowledge representations. Due to theory development of KM that it has been transform as an emerging discipline. That is closely linked with the telematic technology because it makes possible to operate the KM process. If we observe a network research as an organizational complex system the capacity to appropriate, develop and to use technology allow breaks the disciplinary limits of its functional structure. However, we observed the need to transform the disciplinary action scheme to develop that capacity, especially in Mexican researcher, teachers and students in the social sciences sphere. We had considerate that this transformation can be done by KM processes. We explain the transformation process of action scheme based in the Constructivist Theory. We used the methodology perspective of the organizational complex systems for the construction of a KM conceptual model. The results of the empirical research showed us the technological capacity that had been develop when we introduced KM process in the functional structure of a research network of social sciences academics in Mexico City.
153-164

REFERENCES

References: 

Andee-Egg, Ezequiel. (2006). Métodos y técnicas de Investigación Social. Acerca del conocimiento y del pensar científico. Lumen. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Blundell, Brian. (1995). “Intellectual Capital, the Distribution of Power and Innovation: Can Managers Realise the Potencial?, Managing Intellectual Capital and Innovation”, en: 17th Annual McMaster Business Conference, Hamilton, Canada.
Blundell, Brian. (1995). “Intellectual Capital, the Distribution of Power and Innovation: Can Managers Realise the Potencial?, Managing Intellectual Capital and Innovation”, en: 17th Annual McMaster Business Conference, Hamilton, Canada.
Bontis, Nick. (1997). “Managing Knowledge By Diagnosting organizational Learning Flows and Intellectual Capital Stocks: Framing and Advancing the Literature”. Ivey Working Paper (Forthcoming Winter 1997)
- (1996). “Intellectual Capital”, en: R. Michalski and M. Sealey (eds.), Society of Management Accountants of Canada Professional program, Society of CMAs. Toronto, Module 5, Part 4.2.
Brooking, A. (1997). “The management of intellectual capital”, en; Journal of Long Range Planning, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 364-5
Carrillo Velázquez, Lucia Patricia. (2010). Plataforma telemática TIDI: Telemática para la investigación y la docencia. Copyright. Copyright © 2010. Carrillo Velázquez Lucia Patricia, INDAUTOR 03-2010-042213050800-01. UNAM. Distrito Federal, México.
Retrieved Abril, 2010 from http://telematica.politicas.unam.mx
-- (2010). Plataforma telemática TIDI-LAOMS: Telemática para la investigación y la docencia-LAOMS. Copyright © 2010. Carrillo Velázquez Lucia Patricia, INDAUTOR 03-2010-0617111595400-01. UNAM. Distrito Federal, México. Retrieved Abril, 2010 from
http://telematica.politicas.unam.mx/LAOMS/
Davenport T.H. DeLong, D.W. y Beers, M.C. (1998). “Successful Knowledge management projects”, en: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 2, Winter, pp. 43-57.
Drucker, Peter. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society, Harper Collins, New York.
Edvinsson, Leif y Malone, Michael. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding Its hidden Brainpower, Harper Collins, New York.
GDF. Gobierno del Distrito Federal. (2010) Becas ICyTDF y Becas Mujeres ICyTDF. Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Distrito Federal. [En línea, 3, junio, 2010]
http://www.icyt.df.gob.mx/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4...
García Rolando. (2000). El conocimiento en construcción, de las formulaciones de Jean Piaget a la teoría de sistemas complejos. Gedisa. Barcelona.
- (2006) Sistemas complejos. Conceptos. Método y fundamentación epistemológica de la investigación interdisciplinaria. Gedisa. Barcelona.
González Casanova, Pablo. (2001). “La nueva universidad”, en: Cazés, D. et al. (coords.). Encuentro de especialistas en educación superior. Vol. I. CEIICH-UNAM. México. 163
Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi / 2010 Cilt: V Sayı: II
- (2004). Las nuevas ciencias y las humanidades. De la academia a la política. Anthropos, Editorial Complutense e IIS, UNAM. España.
Hudson, William J., (1993). Intellectual Capital: How to Build It, Enhance It, Use It, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Jasso, Villazul Javier. (2004). “La empresa y el entorno de la innovación: vinculación, redes y sistemas de innovación” en: Valdés Luis (coord.) 2004 El valor de la tecnología. Fondo Editorial FCA, UNAM. México.
Infante, José y otros. (2007). Hacia la sociedad del conocimiento. Trillas. México.
Junnarkar, B. y Brown, Carol. (1997). “Re-Assessing the Enabling Role of Information Technology in KM”, en: Journal of Knowledge Management Vol. 1 No. 2 December.
KMAT. (1996). Knowledge Management Assessment Tool. Arthur Andersen KMAT Study. London.
McAdam, Rodney. McCreedy, Sandra. (1999). “A critical review or knowledge management models”, en: The Leaming Organization. Número, 3. Volumen 6 año 1999.
Miller, Riel, (1996). Measuring What People Know: Human Capital Accounting for the Knowledge Economy, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
Neüman, María Isabel. (2008). Construcción de la categoría "Apropiación Social". Quórum Académico. Vol. 5, N° 2, julio-diciembre 2008, Pp. 67 – 98. Universidad del Zulia • ISSN 1690-7582
Nonaka, Ikujiro. (1991). “The Knowledge-Creating Company”, en: Harvard Business Review, November-December 1991, pp. 96-1004.
—. (1994). “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, en: Organizations Science. Vol. 5. No. 1. February 1994. Pp. 14-37.
—. y Takeuchi, Hirotaka. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
ONU (2003 y 2005). Cumbre mundial sobre la sociedad de la información. Primera fase 2003, Suiza. Segunda Fase, 2005 Túnez. http://www.itu.int/wsis/index-es.html [enero 2006].
Prasad, Biren. (2000). “Converting computer-integrated manufacturing into an intelligent information system by combining CIM with concurrent engineering and knowledge management”, en: Industrial management & Data System, 100/7 301-316.
Quin, J. B. (1992). Intelligent Enterprice: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry. The Free Press. New York.
Reich, R.B. (1991). The word of Nations. Alfred A. Knopf. New York.
Rowley, Jennifer. (2000). “Is higher education ready for knowledge management?”, en: The International Journal of Educational Management. 14/7 325-333.
Senge Peter. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the learning Organization, Doubleday Currency, New York.
Shariq, Z. Syed. (1997). “Knowledge Management: An emerging discipline”, en: Journal of the academy of management, Vol. 1 No.1, pp. 75-82.
Skime, David y Amidon, Debra. (1997). Creating the Knowledge-based Business, Business Intelligence, London.
Slaughter , Sheila y Leslie, Larry. (1997). Academic Capitalism. Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University, The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore.
Sveiby, Karl Eric. (1997). The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring knowledge-Based Assets, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco.
Toffler. Alvin. (1990). Powershift: Knowledge, walth and violence at the edge of the 21st century. Bantam Books. New York.
UNESCO. (2000). Educación para todos, cumplir nuestros compromisos comunes. Texto aprobado por el Foro Mundial sobre la Educación: Dakar, Senegal. www.unesco.org/ education/efa/ed_for_all/dakfram_spa.shtml [abril de 2003].
Wiig, Karl M. (1997). “Knowledge Management: An introduction and perspective”, en The journal of knowledge management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 6-14.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com