You are here

Home » Content

THE ROLE OF ACCULTURIZATION FOR CROSS-CULTURAL HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT

Journal Name:

  • Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Many of global researches demonstrated that innovative enterprises are in average twice more profitable than other enterprises. Intensive global competition, higher customer expectations and greater focus on quality have resulted in much greater requirements placed upon employees today than decades ago. The challenge has been to internalize a new type of organizational behavior in order to operate successfully under unfamiliar conditions. It is clear that in creation of innovative enterprise not only technology is important, but also people, culture and communication. Under going globalization process it is important to draw attention that it influences organization employees too, thus human resource development as well. In this paper authors analyze factors impacting global human resource development, globalization’s impact on human resource development process. Mostly authors emphasize influence of culture and speak about opportunities of acculturization.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_91824_7_pp_103-115.pdf
  • 2
103-115
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Arthur, W. A. Jr. & Bennett, W. W. Jr. (1995). The International Assignee: The Relative Importance of Factors
Perceived to Contribute to Success. Personnel Psychology, 48, 99-114.
Bates, R. (2003). “Human resource development objectives”, in Encyclopedia of life support systems. Oxford,
UK: Eolss, under auspices of UNESCO.
Black, J. S. & Stephens, J. K. (1989). The Influence of the Spouse on American Expatriate Adjustment and
Intent to Stay in Pasific Rim Overseas Assignments. Journal of Management, 15, 529-544.
Caligiuri, P. (2000). The Big Five Personality Characteristics as Predictors of Expatriates’ Desire to Terminate
the Assignment and Supervisor-Rated Performance. Personnel Psychology, 53, 67-88.
Chermack, T. J., Lynham, S. A. & Ruona, W. E. A. (2003). Critical Uncertainties Confronting Human Resource
Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5, 257-271.
Dilworth, L. (2003). Searching for the future of HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(3), 241-144.
Dirani, K. (2006). Exploring Socio-Cultural Factors that Influence HRD Practices in Lebanon. Human Resource
Development International, 9 (1), 85-98.
Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty first century. New York: Farrer, Straus, and
Giraux.
Gale, S. (2003). Taxing Situations for Expatriates. Workforce, June, 100-104.
Garonzik, R., Brockner, J. & Siegal, P. (2000). Identifying International Assignees at Risk for Premature
Departure: The Interactive Effect of Outcome Favorability and Procedural Fairness. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 85, 13-20.
Harris, P.R. & Moran R.T. (1989). Managing Cultural Differences. Houston, TX, Gulf Publication.
Hartenstein, A. (1999). The Challenges of Globalization and the HRD Response. Advances in Developing
Human Resources, 83 (1), 83-87.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations. London: McGraw-Hill.
Human resource development: learning and training for individuals and organizations (2005). Edited by
Wilson, J.P. Kogan Page.
Kumpikaite, V. & Ciarniene, R. (2008a). New training technologies and their use in training and development
activities: Survey evidence from Lithuania. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(2),
155-159.
Kumpikaite, V. & Ciarniene, R. (2008b). New training technologies developing human resource. Economics and
Management = Ekonomika ir vadyba, 13, 368-373.
Kumpikaite, V. & Sakalas, A. (2007). The Impact of Globalization on Human Resource Development. Changes
in Society, Changes in Organizations, and the Ch anging Role of HRM: Managing International Human
Resource in a Complex World. Conference Proceedings. The 9th International Human Resource
Management Conference.
Kumpikaite, V. & Sakalas, A. (2008). Human resource development system evaluation in companies in the
furniture trade in Lithuania. EBS Review: Organizational Change and Development in Transitional
Countries, 1(24), 63-82.
Kumpikaite, V. (2009). Human resource training and development importance in post communist countries in
cross-cultural context. Transformations in Business & Economics. 8 (3), 131-144.
Kumpikaite, V., Mihi Ramirez, A., Rito Ribeiro, H. N. (2012). Evaluation of Skills Development Methods:
Intercultural Study of Students’ Attitudes. Ekonomika ir vadyba-Economics and Management, 17 (1),
381-389.
Laurant, A. (1983). The cultural diversity of western conceptions of management. International Studies of
Management and Organization, Spring-Summer, 75-96.
Lee, M. (2001). A refusal to define HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 327-341.
Losey, M., Meisinger, S., Ulrich, D., (2005). Future of Human Resource Management, 357-359, John Willey &
Sons, Inc.
The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management / Volume: VII FALL
Tüm hakları BEYDER’e aittir 116 All rights reserved by The JKEM
Mankin, D. (2009). Human resource development. Oxford university press.
Marquardt, M. & Berger, N.O. (2003). The Future: Globalization and New Roles for HRD. Advances in
Developing Human Resources, 5, 283, 283-295.
Marquardt, M. & Reynolds, A. (1994). The Global Learning Organization. Burr Ridge: Irwin Professional
Publishing.
Marquardt, M. (1998). The Global Advantage: How World Class Companies Improve Performance through
Globalization. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
Marquardt, M., Berger, N., Loan, P. (2004). HRD in the age of globalization: a practical guide to workplace
learning in the third millennium. New York: Basic Books.
McLean, G. (2001). Human resource development as a factor in the inevitable move to globalization. Academy
of Human Resource Development, Conference Proceedings. Tulsa, OK:Academy of Human Resource
Development, 731-738.
McLean, G. N., & McLean, L. D. (2001). If we can’t define HRD in one country, how can we define it in an
international context? Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 313-326.
Metcalfe, B. D., & Rees, C. J. (2005). Theorizing advances in international human resource development.
Human Resource Development International, 8(4), pp. 449-465.
Nadler, L. & Nadler, Z. (1991). Developing Human Resources. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Noe, R.A. (2005). Employee Training and Development. The McGraw Hill.
Peng, T. K., Peterson, M. F., & Shyi,Y. (1991). Quantitative methods in cross-national management research:
Trend and equivalence issues. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(2), 87-107.
Peterson, L. (1997). International HRD: What we know and what we don’t know. Human Resource Development
Quarterly, 8(1), 63-79.
Pettinger, R. (2007). Introduction to Management (Fourth edition). Palgrave Macmillan.
Ronen, S. and Shenkar, O. (1985). Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: a review and synthesis.
Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 435 – 454.
Sathe, V. (1985). Culture and Realated Corporate Ralities. Homewood, IL:Richard D. Irwin.
Wang, X. & McLean, G. N. (2007). The Dilemma of Defining International Human Resource Development.
Human Resource Development Review, 6, 96-108.
Weinberger, L. A. (1998). Commonly held theories in HRD. Human Resource Development International, 1(1),
75 – 93.
Woodall, J. (2005). Theoretical frameworks for comparing HRD in an international context. Human Resource
Development International, 8(4), 399-402.
Woodall, J. (2006). From individual learning to social learning—Reframing HRD theory and practice. Human
Resource Development International, 9(2), 153-155.
Yaw, A. D., McGovern, I., & Budhwar, P. (2000). Complementarities or competition: the development of
human resources in South-East Asian growth triangle – Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11 (2), 314-335.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com