Journal Name:
- Çankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Keywords (Original Language):
Author Name |
---|
Abstract (2. Language):
D. H. Lawrence, Lady Chatterley’in Sevgilisi’nin yay›mlanmas›ndan sonra anlat›daki iki de¤iflik izlek
nedeniyle geliflime aç›k bir yazar olarak kabul gördü. Bu izleklerden ilki kad›n cinselli¤i ve evlilikleri
baflar›s›z olan kad›nlar›n cinsel tatmini konusundaki özgür seçimleri, di¤eri ise üst s›n›fa ait bir erke¤in kar›
s›yla cinsel aç›dan tatmin edici olmayan bir iliflki yaflarken, iflçi s›n›f›ndan bir erke¤in aristokrat bir kad›
nla yaflad›¤› cinsel iliflkidir.
Fakat 1970’lerin önde gelen feminist elefltirmenleri D. H. Lawrence ve roman›n›, kad›n cinselli¤ini görmezden
gelip cinsellik konusunda erkek bak›fl aç›s›n› yans›tt›¤›, duygusal anlamda tek tatmin edici iliflki
türü olarak heteroseksüel iliflkiyi kabul etti¤i ve kad›nlar›n annelik yoluyla tatmin olmalar›n› öne sürdü¤ü
için elefltirmifllerdir.
Arketiplerin insan kiflili¤i üzerindeki etkilerini göz önünde bulunduran Jung elefltirisine göre, roman›n ana
erkek karakteri olan Mellors, ana kad›n karaktere göre ne daha üstün ne de daha afla¤›dad›r. Ama yazar,
erkek ana karakterin kad›n›n gözünde onu tanr›sallaflt›ran özellikleri oldu¤u ve evlilikte karfl›l›kl› mutlulu-
¤un yaln›zca kad›n›n erke¤inin hayranl›k uyand›r›c› özelli¤ine uyum sa¤lamas›na ba¤l› oldu¤u düflüncelerini
okura dayat›r.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language):
DH Lawrence was hailed as a progressive writer after the publication of Lady Chatterley’s Lover
as the theme of the narrative suggests a shift in emphasis through (a) giving expression to women’s sexuality,
speaking for their freedom of choice in sexual fulfillment if their marriage fails, and (b) depicting a
working class man having sexual relations with an aristocratic woman, when the ruling class man fails to
have sexually fulfilling relations with his wife.
But, in the 1970s prominent feminist critics launched a tirade against DH Lawrence and Lady Chatterley’s
Lover saying that (a) the novel undermines women’s sexuality, endorsing male-centered view of sexuality,
hailing heterosexual relationship as the only emotionally satisfying relationship, and (b) it advocates
women seeking fulfillment through motherhood.
From Jungian perspective on the effects of archetypes upon human personality the principal male character
in the novel, Mellors, is hermaphrodite, therefore, neither superior, nor inferior to the principal female
character. However, the writer imposes upon the reader the belief that (a) the male protagonist possesses
traits that make him a demigod to be looked at with awe by the female protagonist, and (b) conjugal
happiness in married life solely depends upon the adjustments a woman needs to make owing to the aweinspiring
prowess of her man.
- 2