You are here

Yerel E-Katılımın Yeni Aracı Olarak Sosyal Ağlar: Facebook ve Twitter Örnekleri

Social Networks as a New Tool of E-Participation in Local: Example of Facebook and Twitter

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article focuses on used “what level” and “how” of Facebook and Twitter tools that giving a new impetus to the process of communication or interaction of organizations and individuals, at the level organizations of municipality and mayors of municipality in the context of participation in local public policy. In this context, at the level of personal, Facebook account of 6 mayor and Twitter account of 12 mayor; at the level organizations, Facebook account of 22 municipality and Twitter account of 22 municipality was analyzed by qualitative content analysis method. According to the overall results of study, in this study were determined; even though problems transmitter / requesting information interactions are come forwarded at personal Twitter accounts, examined social networking accounts have the interaction is limited at considering the number of members on accounts and accounts are used form of encourage the direct involvement, form of transfer information which is considered as a first stage.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmada, son yıllarda örgütleri ve bireylerin iletişim veya etkileşim sürecine yeni bir hız kazandıran sosyal ağların, daha da özelde Facebook ve Twitter araçlarının, belediye örgütleri ve belediye başkanları düzeyinde, yerel kamusal politikalara katılım bağlamında, “ne düzeyde” ve “nasıl” kullanıldığının ortaya çıkarılmasına çalışılmıştır. Bu kapsamda, kişisel düzeyde 6 belediye başkanının Facebook ve 12 belediye başkanının Twitter; kurumsal düzeyde ise 22 belediyenin Facebook ve yine 22 belediyenin Twitter hesabı araştırma kapsamında niteliksel içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın genel sonuçlarına göre, kişisel Twitter hesaplarında sorunları ileten/bilgi talep eden etkileşim öne çıkmakla birlikte, hesaplardaki üye sayısı dikkate alındığında sınırlı düzeyde etkileşimin olduğu, daha çok katılımın ilk evresi olarak kabul edilen bilgi aktaran, doğrudan katılımı teşvik etmeyen biçiminde kullanıldığı tespit edilmiştir.
209
242

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Agostino, D. (2012). The Effectiveness of Social Software for Public Engagement. http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/40816/InTech The_effectiveness_of_social_software_for_public_engagement.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 05 Şubat 2013).
Aksu, H., Çankaya, M.N. ve Candan, U. (2011). Herşey Çıplak. 1. Baskı, İstanbul: Madiacat Yayınları.
Atari, S.E., Stewart-Weeks, M. ve McCalla, J. (2011). Web 2.0 in Next-Generation Government and Governance: A Middle East Point of View. http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/ps/Web_2-Mid-East-Governance_IB... (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Ekim 2014).
Bayraktutan G., Binark, M., Çomu, T., Doğu, B., İslamoğlu, G. ve Aydemir A. T. (2014). Siyasal İletişim Sürecinde Sosyal Medya ve Türkiye’de 2011 Genel Seçimlerinde Twitter Kullanımı. Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi: bilig, 68, 59-96.
Beneito-Montagut , R., Shaw, D. ve Brewster, C. (2013). Disaster 2.0: Emergency Management Agencies Use and Adoption of Web 2.0. http://www.disaster20.eu/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2014/03/D2_SM_Repor... (Erişim Tarihi: 12 Ekim 2014).
Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T. ve Grimes, J.M. (2010). Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency: E-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-corruption Tools for Societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264–271.
Bayraktutan G., Binark, M., Aydemir A.T., Doğu, B., Çomu, T., İslamoğlu, G. (2013). Sosyal Medya Ortamlarının Siyasal İletişim Uygulamaları Açısından İncelenmesi: Türkiye’de 2011 Genel Seçimleri’nde Facebook ve Twitter’ın Siyasi Partiler ve Liderler Tarafından Kullanılması. Ankara: TUBİTAK (Proje No: 111K263).
Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S. ve Flores, F. (2012). Local E-Government 2.0: Social Media and Corporate Transparency in Municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123–132.
Brabham, D.C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. London: Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Criado, J.I., Martinez-Fuentes, G. ve Silvan, A. (2012). Social Media for Political Campaigning: The Use of Twitter by Spanish Mayors in 2011 Local Elections. C. G. Reddick and S. K. Aikins (Ed.). Web 2.0 Technologies and
L.Memiş Bahar/Spring 2015
Cilt 5, Sayı 1, ss.209-242 Volume 5, Issue 1, pp. 209-242
235
Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications içinde (219-232). New York: Springer.
Clarke, A. (2012). Open Dialogue” and The Government of Canada’s Use of Social Media: Bureaucratic Barriers to Democratic Engagement in The Digital Age. http://www.cpsa-acsp.ca/papers-2012/Clarke.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Şubat 2013).
Cohen, N. (2008). The Valorization of Surveillance: Towards a Politcal Economy of Facebook. Democratic Communique, 22 (1), 1-22.
Deloitte (2008a). Change Your World or The World Will Change You. http://www.deloitte.com/assets/DcomEcuador/Local%20Assets/Documents/Nuev... (Erişim Tarihi: 08 Ekim 2014).
Deloitte (2008b). National Issues Dialogues Web 2.0: The Future of Collaborative Government. http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Document... (Erişim Tarihi: 09 Eylül 2014).
Dixon, B.E. (2010). Towards E-Government 2.0: An Assessment of Where E-Government 2.0 Is and Where It Is Headed. Public Administration & Management, 15 (2), 418-454.
Dong, Q., Toney, J. ve Giblin, P. ( 2010 ). Social Network Dependency and Intended Political Participation, Human Communication. A Publication of the Pacific and Asian Communication Association. 13 (1), 13-27.
Ellison, N. ve Hardey, M. (2014). Social Media and Local Government: Citizenship, Consumption and Democracy. Local Government Studies, 40 (1), 21-40.
Erdoğan, M. (1998). “Bilgi Toplumu” ve Demokrasi. Yeni Türkiye 21. yy Özel Sayısı (Ocak-Şubat), 4 (19), 466-469.
Eryılmaz, B. (2009). Kamu Yönetimi, İkinci Baskı, Ankara: Okutman Yayıncılık.
Hansen-Flaschen, L. ve Parker, K.P. (2012). The Rise of Social Govrnment: An Advanced Guide and Review of Social Media’s Role in Local Government Operation. https://www.fels.upenn.edu/news/rise-social-media-local-government (Erişim Tarihi: 18 Ekim 2014).
Gardini, S., Mattei, M.M. ve Orelli, R.L. (2012). Toward a Gov 2.0 Society for All: European Strategis for Public Service Delivery. C. G. Reddick and S. K. Aikins (Ed.), Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance:
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Çankırı Karatekin University
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Journal of The Faculty of Economics
Fakültesi Dergisi and Administrative Sciences
236
Political, Policy and Management Implications içinde (63-78), New York: Springer.
Golbeck, J., Grimes, J.M. ve Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter Use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (8), 1612–1621.
Gürsul F., Ünal, G.T., Karındaş, A., Dursun, F., İkbal, M. ve Şahin, K. (2012). Belediye Başkanları Twitter Araştırması. http://www.slideshare.net/fatihgursul/tt-belediye-bakan-aratrmas-ekim-2012 (Erişim Tarihi: 20 Mart 3013).
Hand, L.C. ve Ching, B.D. (2011). An Exploration of Power and Citizen Engagement in Local Governments’ Use of Social Media, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33 (3), 362 – 382.
Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: Kalabalıkların Gücü, Bir İşin Geleceğine Nasıl Şekil Verebilir?. (G. Aksoy, Çev.). 1. Baskı, İstanbul: Optimist Yayım Dağıtım.
Jaeger, P.T., Bertot, J.C. ve Shilton, K. (2012). Information Policy and Social Media: Framing Governrnent - Citizen Web 2.0 Interactions. C. G. Reddick and S. K. Aikins (Ed.). Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications içinde (11-25). New York: Springer.
Karkın, N. (2014). Barriers for Sustainable e-Participation Process: The Case of Turkey. L. G. Anthopoulos and C. G. Reddick (Ed.). Government e-Strategic Planning and Management: Practices, Patterns and Roadmaps içinde (227-243). New York: Springer.
Khan, G.F., Yoon, H.Y. ve Park, H.W. (2014). Social Media Communication Strategies of Government Agencies: Twitter Use in Korea and the U.S. . Asian Journal of Communication, 24 (1), 60-78.
Khan, G.F., Swar, B. ve Lee, S.K. (2014). Social Media Risks and Benefits: A Public Sector Perspective. Social Science Computer Review, 32 (5), 606-627.
Kingsley, C. (2012). Making the Most of Social Media: 7 Lessons from Successful Cities. https://www.fels.upenn.edu/sites/www.fels.upenn.edu/files/final_redesign... (Erişim Tarihi: 02 Eylül 2010).
L.Memiş Bahar/Spring 2015
Cilt 5, Sayı 1, ss.209-242 Volume 5, Issue 1, pp. 209-242
237
Kim, S.K., Park, M.J. ve Rho, J.J. (2013). Effect of the Government's Use of Social Media on the Reliability of the Government: Focus on Twitter. Public Management Review, 17 (3), 328-355.
Kök, S. ve Tekerek, M. (2012). Sokak Siyasetinden Sosyal Ağlara Yeni Aktivizm: Arap Baharı Deneyimi. http://iibfdergisi.ksu.edu.tr/Imagesimages/files/9.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 09 Ekim 2014).
Landsbergen, D. (2010). Government as Part of the Revolution: Using Social Media to Achieve Public Goals. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 8 (2), 135-147.
Linder, D. (2012). From E-Government to We-Government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in the Age of Social Media. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 446–454.
Lovejoy, K., Waters, R.D. ve Saxton, G.D. (2012). Engaging Stakeholders Through Twitter: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Getting More Out of 140 Characters or Less. Public Relations Review, 38, 313– 318.
McNutt, K. (2014). Public Engagement in the Web 2.0 Era: Social Collaborative Technologies in A Public Sector Context. Canadian Public Administration / Administration Publique du Canada Volume, 57 (1), 49–70.
Mergel, I. (2012a). Working the Network A Manager’s Guide for Using Twitter in Government. http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/iamergel/files/Mergel_2012_A%20Managers%2... (Erişim Tarihi: 17 Eylül 2014).
Mergel, I. (2012b). The Social Media Innovation Challenge in The Public Sector. Information Polity, 17, 281–292.
Mergel, I. (2013). Social Media in the Public Sector - A Guide to Participation, Collaboration and Transparency in The Networked World. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mergel, I. (2014). A Manager’s Guide to Assessing the Impact of Government Social Media Interactions,. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/A%20Manager%E2%8... (Erişim Tarihi: 17 Eylül 2014).
Missingham, R. (2011). E-Parliament: Opening the Door. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 426–434.
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Çankırı Karatekin University
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Journal of The Faculty of Economics
Fakültesi Dergisi and Administrative Sciences
238
Mota, J.C. ve Santinha, G. (2012). Social Media and Civic Engagement: Discussing The Case Of Aveiro, Portugal, European Journal of ePractice, 16, 29-41.
Nam, T. ve Sayogo, D.S. (2011). Government 2.0 Collects the Wisdom of Crowds, Social Informatics Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6984, 51-58.
Omar, K., Stockdale, R. ve Scheepers, H. (2014). Social Media Use in Local Government: An Australian Perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 37 (10), 666-675.
OECD (2007). Participative Web and User-Created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking. http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/free/9307031e.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 20 Eylül 2014).
OECD (2009). Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement For better Policy and Services. http://www.oecd.org/gov/focusoncitizenspublicengagementforbetterpolicyan... (Erişim Tarihi: 20 Eylül 2014).
Open Government, A Progress Report to the American People (2009). http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ogi-progress-re... (Erişim Tarihi: 09.10.2014).
O’Reilly, T. (2010). Government As a Platform. http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1234000000774/index.html (Erişim Tarihi: 3 Ekim 2014).
Öncel, Ü. (2012). En Büyük 500 Facebook Sayfasından Etkileşim İpuçları. http://www.webrazzi.com/2012/12/20/en-buyuk-500-facebook-sayfasindan-etk... (Erişim Tarihi: 20.3.3013)
Özen, H. ve Avcı, Ö. (2013). Her Yer Taksim Her Yer Direniş: Kentsel Bir Hareketin Ulusal Yayılımı. Atılım Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3 (1-2), 31-45.
Perez, C.C., Bolivar, M.P.R. ve Hernandez, A.M.L. (2012). The Use of Web 2.0 to Transform Public Services Delivery: The Case of Spain. C. G. Reddick and S. K. Aikins (Ed.). Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications içinde (41-61). New York: Springer.
Perlman, B.J. (2012). Social Media Sites at the State and Local Levels: Operational Success and Governance Failure. State and Local Government Review, 44(1), 67-75.
L.Memiş Bahar/Spring 2015
Cilt 5, Sayı 1, ss.209-242 Volume 5, Issue 1, pp. 209-242
239
Purser, K. (2012). Using Social Media in Local Government: 2011 Survey Report. http://www.acelg.org.au/news/using-social-media-local-government-2011-su... (Erişim Tarihi: 13.10.2014).
Reddick, C.G. ve Aikins, S.K. (2012). Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. C. G. Reddick and S. K. Aikins (Ed.). Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications içinde (1-7). New York: Springer.
Sandoval-Almazan, R. ve Gil-Garcia, J.R. (2012a). Government-Citizen Interactions Using Web 2.0 Tools: The Case of Twitter in Mexico. C. G. Reddick and S. K. Aikins (Ed.). Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications içinde (233-248), Springer.
Sandoval-Almazan, R. ve Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012b). Are Government İnternet Portals Evolving Towards More İnteraction, Participation, and Collaboration? Revisiting The Rhetoric of E-Government Among Municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 72-81.
Sandoval-Almazan, R., Rogel, R.M.N. ve Díaz, M.d.R.G. (2012c). Facebook & Twitter in Public Administration: the case of Mexican Local Governments. https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/575244.ES2012.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 01 Eylül 2014).
Sandoval-Almazan, R. ve Gil-Garcia, J.R. (2014). Towards Cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding The Use Of Social Media and Other İnformation Technologies For Political Activism And Social Movements. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 365–378.
Sert, N.Y. (2012). Online Aktivizm Araçları Yolu İle Oluşturulan Etkilerin Metafor Kullanılarak Açıklanması, Örnek Olay İncelemesi: ‘İnternetime Dokunma” Eylemi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 126-140.
Sobacı, M.Z. ve Kargın, N. (2013). The Use of Twitter by Mayors in Turkey: Tweets For Better Public Services?. Government Information Quarterl, 30 (4), 417-425.
Snead. J.T. (2013). Social Media Use in The U.S. Executive Branch. Government Information Quarterly, 30, 56–63.
Şit, C. A. (2013). Türkiye’deki Mobil Facebook Kullanıcılarının Sayısı 5 Ayda 1.2 Milyon Yükseldi. http://www.webrazzi.com/2013/02/16/turkiye-mobil-facebook-kullanici-sayi... (Erişim Tarihi: 20 Mart 2013).
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Çankırı Karatekin University
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Journal of The Faculty of Economics
Fakültesi Dergisi and Administrative Sciences
240
Şit, C. A. (2012). Türkiye Sosyal Ağlarda Geçirilen Süreye Göre Dünya’da Beşinci. http://www.webrazzi.com/2012/12/25/turkiye-sosyal-aglarda-dunyada-besinci/ (Erişim Tarihi: 20 Mart 3013).
Tapscott, D., Williams, A.D. ve Herman, D. (2008). Government 2.0: Transforming Government and Governance for the Twenty-First Century. http://wiki.dbast.com/images/a/aa/Transforming_govt.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 02 Eylül 2014).
Towner, T.L. (2012). Campaigns and Elections in a Web 2.0 World: Uses, Effects and Implications for Democracy. C. G. Reddick and S. K. Aikins (Ed.). Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications içinde (185-199). New York: Springer.
Veljkovic, N., Bogdanovic-Dinic, S. ve Stoimenov, L. (2012). Web 2.0 as a Technological Driver of Democratic, Transparent and Participatory Government. C. G. Reddick and S. K. Aikins (Ed.). Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications içinde (137-151). New York: Springer.
Vesnic-Alujevic, L. (2012). Political Participation and Web 2.0 in Europe: A Case Study of Facebook. Public Relations Review, 38, 466– 470.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. 7. Baskı, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Waters, R.D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A. ve Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging Stakeholders Through Social Networking: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35, 102–106.
Webb, P.L. (2012). Microblogging: An Analysis of Government Issued Policies and Best Practices, C.G. Reddick ve S.K. Aikins (Ed.), Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance: Political, Policy and Management Implications içinde (27-40). New York: Springer.
Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D. ve Graham, L.T. (2012). A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7 (3), 203-220.
Zheng, L. ve Zheng, T. (2014). Innovation through social media in the public sector: Information and interactions. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 106-117.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com