You are here

Home » Content

Hukuki ve İdari Açıdan Napolyonist Devletlerde Teftiş Sistemi ve Teftiş Birimleri

Inspection System and Inspection Units in Napolyonist States from Legal and Administrative Aspect

Journal Name:

  • Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Turkish inspection system as Turkish public administration is structured with respect to the French model. This model, not only the Turkish public administration, has also affected the public administration and management system of Italy, Greece, Spain and Portugal. Inspection boards in Turkey are required to be removed on the grounds that insufficient and ineffective. Similar traditions of public administration and inspection system have to see what the latest situation in these country, is thought to contribute to the debate on Turkey. The purpose of the study is to determine what happened in some Western countries which have the Napolyonist state traditions. The topic of this study consists of inspection systems in the Napolyonist state. Inspectorates continue its presence in other states including pioneering state France. However in recent years, significant changes have been made the tasks and activities of inspection units and inspection activities declined in the lower ranks of activities carried out by this unit.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Türk teftiş sistemi, kamu yönetimi gibi Fransız modeli örnek alınarak yapılandırılmıştır. Fransız modeli, Napolyonist model veya Güney modeli denilen devlet türü yapılanmasıdır. Söz konusu model sadece Türk kamu yönetimini değil, İtalya, Yunanistan, İspanya ve Portekiz kamu yönetim ve idare sistemini de etkilemiştir. Türkiye’de teftiş kurulları yetersiz ve etkisiz olduğu gerekçesiyle kaldırılmak istenmektedir. Benzer kamu yönetimi ve teftiş sistemi geleneklerine sahip ülkelerde son durumun ne olduğunu görmenin, Türkiye’deki tartışmalara farklı bir pencereden bakmaya katkıda bulunacağı düşünülmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, Napolyonist devlet geleneklerine sahip bazı Batılı ülkelerde teftiş sisteminin durumunun ne olduğunu ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmanın konusunu hukuki ve idari açıdan Napolyonist devletlerdeki teftiş sistemleri oluşturmaktadır. Teftiş birimleri, başta Fransa olmak üzere çalışmada yer verilen devletlerde varlığını devam ettirmektedir. Fakat son yıllarda teftiş birimlerinin görev ve faaliyet alanlarında önemli değişiklikler yapılmış, teftiş faaliyeti bu birimlerin yürüttüğü faaliyetler içerisinde alt sıralara gerilemiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-hukuki-idari-acidan-napolyonist-devletlerde-teftis-sistemi-teftis-birimleri.pdf
  • 1
315
336
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

5227 sayılı Kamu Yönetiminin Temel İlkeleri ve Yeniden Yapılandırılması Hakkında Kanun Tasarısı.
Alba, C. R. and Navarro, C. (2011), Administrative Tradition and Reform in Spain: Adaptation versus Innovation. Public Administration, 89(3), 783-800.
Bezes, P. (2010). Path-Dependent and Path-Breaking Change in the French Administrative System: The Weight of Legacy Explanations. M. Painter ve B.G. Peters (Ed.). Tradition and Public Administration içinde (158-173). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Y.Soyupek Bahar/Spring 2015
Cilt 5, Sayı 1, ss.315-336 Volume 5, Issue 1, pp.315-336
331
Bordogna, L. ve Neri, S. (2011), Convergence Towards an NPM Programme or Different Models? Public Service Employment Relations in Italy and France. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(11), 2311-2330.
Capano, G. (2003), Administrative Tradition and Policy Change: When Policy Paradigms Matter. The Case of Italian Administrative Reform During the 1990s. Public Administration, 81(4), 781-801.
Christofilopoulou, P. (1992), Professionalism and Public Policy Making in Greece: The Influence of Engineers in the Local Government Reforms. Public Administration, 72, 99-118.
Constitution de la Grèce.
Constitution de la République Française.
Constitution de la République italienne.
Constitution de la République Portugaise.
Constitution Espagnole.
Corte-Real, I. (2008), Public Management Reform in Portugal: Successes and Failures. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 205-229.
Dinçer, Ö. ve Yılmaz, C. (2003). Değişimin Yönetimi İçin Yönetimde Değişim Kamu Yönetiminde Yeniden Yapılanm,1. Ankara: Başbakanlık Yayını.
Direction Générale des Collectivités Locales. (2014). Les Collectivités Locales en Chiffres. Paris: Direction Générale des Collectivités Locales Département des publications, de l’information et de la documentation.
Esen, S. (2004). İspanya. N. E. Keskin (Ed.). Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri içinde (333-366). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Kamu Yönetimi Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi.
European Commission. (2014). Compendium of the public internal control systems in the EU Member States 2014. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Gerbod, P. (1966), Les Inspecteurs Généraux et les Inspections Générales de L’instruction Publique. Revue Historique, 236(1), 79-106.
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Çankırı Karatekin University
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Journal of The Faculty of Economics
Fakültesi Dergisi and Administrative Sciences
332
Hellenic Republic Ministry of Administrative Reform and e-Government. (2014). Inspectors-Controllers Body for Public Administration SEEDD. Athens: Hellenic Republic Ministry of Administrative Reform and e-Government.
http://www.gedd.gr/index.php?action=mission (Erişim Tarihi: 8 Kasım 2014).
http://www.igai.pt/Quem-Somos/Missao/Pages/default.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 17 Kasım 2014).
http://www.igas.gouv.fr/spip.php?article142 (Erişim Tarihi: 31 Ocak 2015).
http://www.igf.finances.gouv.fr/site/igf/Accueil/Qui-sommes-nous/Les_mis... (Erişim Tarihi: 30 Ocak 2015).
http://www.igf.finances.gouv.fr/site/igf/Accueil/Qui-sommes-nous/Aux_ori... (Erişim Tarihi: 31 Ocak 2015).
http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document.asp?reg_id=0&ref_id=ip1532 (Erişim Tarihi: 30 Ocak 2015).
http://www.interieur.gouv.fr/Actualites/L-actu-du-Ministere/L-Assemblee-... (Erişim Tarihi: 30 Ocak 2015).
http://www.interieur.gouv.fr/Le-ministere/Organisation/Inspection-genera... ion/Histoire-de-l-IGA (Erişim Tarihi: 1 Şubat 2015).
http://www.interno.gov.it/mininterno/export/sites/default/it/sezioni/min... (Erişim Tarihi: 8 Kasım 2014).
http://www.rgs.mef.gov.it/VERSIONE-I/La-Ragione/Organigram/IGF/ (Erişim Tarihi: 8 Kasım 2014).
http://www.sgmf.pt/index.php?pid=25 (Erişim Tarihi: 15 Kasım 2014).
Inspection générale des affaires sociales. (2014). IGAS Rapport d’activité 2013. Paris: Inspection générale des affaires sociales.
Inspection Générales des Finances. (2014). Rapport d’activité 2013, Paris: Inspection Générales des Finances.
Jacob, S. (2000), Approche comparative des politiques d’évaluation. Pyramides, 1, 85-113.
Y.Soyupek Bahar/Spring 2015
Cilt 5, Sayı 1, ss.315-336 Volume 5, Issue 1, pp.315-336
333
Karahanoğulları, O. (2004). Fransa, N.E. Keskin (Ed.), Kamu Yönetimi Ülke İncelemeleri içinde (21-90). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Kamu Yönetimi Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi.
Kickert, W.J.M. (2005), Distinctiveness in the Study of Public Management in Europe. A Historical-Institutional Analysis of France, Germany and Italy. Public Management Review, 7(4), 537-563.
Kickert, W. (2007), Public Management Reforms in Countries with a Napoleonic State Model: France, Italy and Spain. C. Pollitt, S. van Thiel and V. Homburg (Eds.). New Public Management in Europe içinde (26-51). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kuhlmann, S. (2010), New Public Management for the ‘Classical Continental European Administration’: Modernization at the Local Level in Germany, France and Italy. Public Administration, 88(4), 1116-1130.
Magone, J. M. (2011). The Difficult Transformation of State and Public Administration in Portugal. Europeanization and the Persistence of Neo-Patrimonialism. Public Administration, 89(3), 756-782.
Natera-Peral, A. ve Ruiz-Martinez, F.J. (2007). İspanya, Avrupa Ülkelerinde Politika Danışmanları ve Memurlar içinde (45-56). Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1997). Managing Across Levels of Government Part One: Overview. Paris: OECD.
Ongaro, E. (2008), Introduction: The Reform of Public Management in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 101-117.
Painter, M. ve Peters B.G. (2010). Administrative Traditions in Comparative Perspective: Families, Groups and Hybrids, M. Painter ve B. G. Peters (Ed.). Tradition and Public Administration içinde (19-30). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pollitt, C. ve Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-New Public Management, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Real Decreto 799/2005, de 1 de julio, por el que se regulan las inspecciones generales de servicios de los departementos ministeriales.
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Çankırı Karatekin University
İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Journal of The Faculty of Economics
Fakültesi Dergisi and Administrative Sciences
334
Rhodes, M.L., Biondi, L., Gomes, R., Melo, A.I., Ohemeng, F., Perez-Lopez, G. vd. (2012). Current State of Public Sector Performance Management in Seven Selected Countries. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(3), 235-271.
Rouban, L. (2002). L’inspection générale des finances 1958-2000 Quarante ans de pantouflage. Paris: Cahier du CEVIPOF.
Sotiropoulos, D.A. (2004), Southern European Public Bureaucracies in Comparative Perspective. West European Politics, 27(3), 405-422.
Spanou, C. ve Sotiropoulos, D.A. (2011), The Odyssey of Administrative Reforms in Greece, 1981-2009: A Tale of Two Reforms of Paths. Public Administration, 89(3), 723-737.
Spanou, C. (2008), State Reform in Greece: Responding to Old and New Challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 150-173.
Tavares, L.V. ve Alves, A.A. (2006), The Future of Portuguese Public Administration and a New Agenda for Public Administration Sciences in the 21st Century. Public Administration, 84(2), 389-406.
Torres, L. ve Vicente, P. (2004). Reshaping Public Administration: The Spanish Experience Compared to the UK. Public Administration, 82(2), 445-464.
Torres, L. (2004), Trajectoires in Public Administration Reforms in European Continental Countries, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(3), 99-112.
Vallemont, S. (1996). Responsabilisation et Amélioration des Performances: L’Expérience Française, Audit des Performances et Modernisation de l’Administration içinde (303-317). Paris: OCDE.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com