You are here

Para Politikası Etkilerinin Ölçümü: Türkiye Örneği

Measurement of the Monetary Policy's Effects: The Case of Turkey

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study attemts to test real effects of monetary policies employing Cochrane (1998) method by using Turkish data for the period of January 1988-December 2003. The findings reveal that both unexpected and expected monetary policies have real effects. From the viewpoint of ecomic theories, the findings are in line with the Keynesian argument contrary to the Classiscal Theory. The results are not supportive to the Rational Expectation Theory, when the real effects of monetary policy are taken as both expected and unexpected. The study also indicate that both the expected and unexpected monetary shocks appears to have an effect on the real output. The size of the effect varies depending on the expectation of economic agents. As the degree of expectation increases (1), the size of the effect increases, correspondingly. The maximum effect of monetary policies appears when 1 =1.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, Türkiye ekonomisi için para politikasının reel etkileri, Ocak 1988-Aralık 2003 dönemi verileriyle VAR'ı temel alan Cochrane (1998) yöntemi kullanılarak sınanmıştır Elde edilen bulgulara göre, hem öngörülmeyen hem de öngörülen para politikasının reel etkileri olduğu görülmüştür. Bu sonuç iktisat kuramları açısından değerlendirildiğinde; Keynesgil geleneğin savlarının desteklendiğini, Klasik geleneğin savlarının ise destek bulmadığını göstermektedir. Para politikasının reel etkileri öngörülen ve öngörülmeyen ayrımına göre analiz edildiğinde ise, Rasyonel Beklentiler Kuramı'nın lehine kanıtların bulunmadığı sonucuna varılmaktadır. Çünkü, çalışmada hem öngörülen hem de öngörülmeyen para politikalarının reel çıktı üzerinde etkileri ortaya çıkmıştır. Etkinin büyüklüğü iktisadi aktörlerin, yani kamunun, uygulanan para politikalarını öngörmelerine bağlı olarak değişmiştir. Öngörü derecesi arttıkça, yani X parametresinin değeri büyüdükçe etkinin değeri de artmıştır. Para politikasının en büyük etkisi X=1 durumunda gerçekleşmiştir.
181
194

REFERENCES

References: 

ATTFIELD, C. L. F. vd. (1981), "A Quarterly Model of Unanticipated Monetary Growth,
Output and The Price Level In The U.K. 1963-1978", Journal of Monetary Economics, 8, 331-50.
BAGLİANO, F. C. ve C. A. FAVERO (1998), "Measuring Monetary Policy With VAR
Models: An Evaluation", European Economic Review, 42, 1069-112.
BARRO, R. J. (1976), "Rational Expectations and the Role of Monetary Policy", Journal
of Monetary Economics, 2, 1-32.
BARRO, R. J. (1977), "Unanticipated Money Growth and Unemployment in the United
States", The American Economic Review, 67 (2), pp. 101-15.
BARRO, R. J. (1978), "Unanticipated Money, Output, and The Price Level In The United
States" Journal of Political Economy, 86 (41), 549-80.
BLEJER, M. I . ve R. B. FERNANDEZ (1980), "The Effect of Unanticipated Money
Growth on Prices and on Output and Its Composition in A Fixed- Exchange-Rate Open Economy",
Canadian Journal of Economics, 13, 82-95.
CANARELLA G. ve S. K. POLLARD (1989), "Unanticipated Monetary Growth, Output,
And The Price Level In Latin America", Journal of Development Economics, 30, 345-58.
CHAREZMA, W. W. ve D. F. DEADMAN (1993), "New Directions in Econometric
Practic, USA: Edward Elgar.
CHU, J. ve A. R. RONALD (1997), "Effects of Unanticipated Monetary Policy on
Aggregate Japanese Output: The Role of Positive and Negative Shocks", Canadian Journal of
Economics, 3, 722-41.
COCHRANE, J. H. (1998), "What Do the VARs Mean? Measuring the Output Effects of
Monetary Policy", Journal of Monetary Economics, 41, 277-300.
COCHRANE, J. H. (1994), "Shocks", NBER Working Paper Series,
www. nber.org/papers/w4698: 1-58.
DAVİDSON, R. ve J .G. MACKINNON (1993), Estimation and Inference in
Econometrics, London: Oxford University Press.
ENDERS, W. (1995), Applied Econometric Time Series, John Wiley and Sons.
190
Yönetim
ve Ekonomi 14/1 (2007) 181-194
GUJARATI, D.
N
. (1995), Basic Econometrics, McGraw-Hill, 3 Baskı.
HOOVER, K. D. ve O. JORDA, (2001), "Measuring Systematic Monetary Policy", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, July/August, 113-137.
JOHANSEN, S. (1995), Likelihood Based Inference in Cointegrating Vector Autoregressive Models, NewYork: Oxford University Press.
KRETZMER, P. E. (1989), "The Cross-Industry Effects of Unanticipated Money In An Equilibrium Business Cycle Model", Journal of Monetary Economics. 23, 275-96.
LUCAS, R. E. (1972), "Expectations and Neutrality of Money", Journal of Economic
Theory, 4 (2), 103-24.
LUCAS, R. E. (1973), "Some International Evidence on Output-Inflation Tradeoffs", TheAmerican Economic Review, 63 (3), 326-34.
LUCAS, R. E. (1976), "Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique", Journal of Monetary Economics, 1(2), 19-46.
LUCAS, R. E. (1980), "Methods and Problems in Business Cycle Theory", Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking. 12, 696-715.
MARASHDEH, O. (1993), "Anticipated and Unanticipated Money: A Case Study of Malaysia", Applied Economics, 25, 919-25.
MERRİCK,
J
. (1983), "Financial Market Efficiency, the Decomposition of Anticipated Versus Unanticipated Money Growth, and Furter Tests of the Relation Between Money and Real Output", Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 15, 222-32.
MOHABBAT, K. ve A. K., Al-Saji (1991), "The Effects on Output of Anticipated and Unanticipated Money Growth: A Case Study of An Oil-Producing Country", Applied Economics,
23, 1493-97.
SHEEHEY, E. J. (1984), "The Neutrality of Money In the Short Run: Some Tests", Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 16, 237-41.
SIMS, C. A. (1980), "Macroeconomics and Reality", Econometrica, 48, 1-49.
SMALL, D. H. (1979), Unanticipated Money Growth and Unemployment in the United States: Comment, American Economic Review, 69, 996-1003.
WOGİN,
G
. (1980), "Unemployment and Monetary Policy Under Rational Expectations", Journal Of Monetary Economics, 6, 59-68.
191

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com