You are here

Home » Content

DİABETİK HASTALARDA FEMOROPOPLİTEAL VEYA FEMOROTİBİAL BYPASS: ORTA DÖNEM TAKİP SONUÇLARI

Journal Name:

  • Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1999

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Thirty-five patients with diabetes mellitus underwent 30 femoropopliteal and 5 femorotibial bypass procedure. This group was matched with 35 cohort of patients without diabetes mellitus which were selected from the vascular database. Results.- Cumulative patency in diabetics for 1 and 3 years were 88.6% and 77.1% respectively. The results in non-diabetics were 91.4% and 84.4%, respectively (p>0.05). Six minor and 3 major amputations had to be performed on diabetics contrary to the 2 minor and 1 major amputations in non-diabetics (p<0.05). Conclusion.- Results achieved in diabetic group were not statistically significant than the non-diabetic group although amputation rate was found higher in the former.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Otuzbeş diyabetik hastada 30 femoropopliteal ve 5 femorotibial bypass yapıldı. Bir ve 3 yıllık takip sonuçları bilgisayar kaynaklarından seçilen benzer özellikli 35 nondiyabetik hasta ile karşılaştırıldı. Greft açıklığı diyabetik grupta 1 ve 3 yıl için %88.6 ve %77.1 bulundu. Bu oranlar nondiyabetikler için %91.4 ve % 84.4 idi (p>0.05). Diyabetik grupta 6 minor, 3 major ve nondiyabetik grupta 2 minör, 1 majör amputasyon yapıldı (p<0.05). Diyabetik hastalarda greft açık kalma oranları nondiyabetiklerden istatistiksel olarak farklı bulunmadı ancak amputasyon oranı yüksek idi.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-diabetik-hastalarda-femoropopliteal-femorotibial-bypass-orta-donem-takip-sonuclari.pdf
  • 3
203-206
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Towne JB. Management of foot lesions in the diabetic patient. Vascular Surgery'de. Ed. RB Rutherford. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company,1995; 895-903.
2. Gibbons GW, Freeman D. Vascular evaluation and treatment of the diabetic. Clin Pediatr Med Surg 1987;4: 377-381.
3. Foster DW. Diabetes mellitus. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine'de. Ed. McGraw-Hill. 10th edition. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company, 1986; 661-673.
4. Moore WS, Malone JM. Vascular reconstruction in the diabetic patient. Angiology 1978;29: 741-748.
5. Isaksson L, Lundgren F. Vein bypass surgery to the foot in patients with diabetes and critical ischemia. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 517-520.
6. Bandyk DF, Kaebnick HW, Stewart GW. Durability of the in situ saphenous vein bypass: A comparison of primary and secondary patency. J Vasc Surg 1987; 5: 256-263.
7. Tannenbaum GA, Pomposelli FB, Marcaccio EJ. Safety of vein bypass grafting to the dorsal pedal artery in diabetic patients with foot. J Vasc Surg 1992; 15: 982-988.
8. Irwin ST, Gilmore J, McGrann S, Hood J, Allen JA. Blood flow in diabetics with foot lesions due to small vessel disease. Br J Surg 1998; 75: 1201-1206.
9. Hurley JJ, Auer AL, Hershey FB. Distal arterial reconstruction: patency and limb salvage rates in diabetics. J Vasc Surg 1987; 5: 796-802.
10. Menzoian JO, Lamorte WW, Paniszyn CC, LeoGerfo FW, Doyle JE. Symptomatology and anatomic patterns of peripheral vascular disease: differing impact of smoking and diabetes. Ann Vasc Surg 1989; 3: 224-228.
11. Darling Rc, Chang BB, Paty PS, Lloyd WE, Leather RP, Shah DM. Coice of peroneal or dorsalis pedis artery bypass for limb salvage. Am J Surg 1995; 170: 109-112.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com