You are here

OBSTRÜKTİF UYKU APNE SENDROMU’NDA NCPAP TEDAVİSİNE UYUMA GÖRSEL AĞIRLIKLI EĞİTİMİN KATKISI

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Nasally applied continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is a highly effective, nonsurgical form of treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. The NCPAP apparatus is bulky, cosmetically unappealing and associated with a number of adverse reactions. Several factors such as severity of sleep apnea, excessive daytime sleepiness, previous surgery as well as NCPAP apparatus may have a role in acceptance and compliance of NCPAP therapy. Various desensitization techniques have been devised to help patients better tolerate and accept treatment. In an attempt to identify effect of video assisted education on NCPAP acceptance, we evaluated 196 patients with obstructive sleep apnea referred to our laboratory for NCPAP trials. Patients were divided into two groups. Before undergoing first night NCPAP trial, the first group (n=84, male: 73%, female: 27%) was informed about their diagnosis, complications of the disease and mechanism of NCPAP treatment by an interview. The second group (n=112, male: 72%, female: 28%) was informed in the same manner and they watched video film to visualize sleep apnea and its consequences and reversal of symptoms by NCPAP therapy. Subjects who accepted and started NCPAP therapy compared with the subjects who did not accept NCPAP in both groups. A probability value less than 0,05 was considered statistically significant. Results.- In the first group (mean age ± SD = 51±10), 15 of the 84 subjects rejected NCPAP treatment. Acceptance rate of NCPAP in the first group was 82%. In the second group (mean age±SD= 52 ± 9), only 7 of the 112 subjects refused NCPAP treatment. Acceptance rate was 93% for this group. There was no difference between two groups in terms of age, sex and RDI. Conclusion.- The findings indicate that the patients who undergo video assisted education about their diagnosis and treatment accept NCPAP therapy more easily.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Obstrüktif uyku apne sendromu tedavisinde cerrahi tedavi ile birlikte en sık kullan ılan yöntem sürekli pozitif havayolu basıncı (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: CPAP) ile yapılan tedavidir. CPAP cihazının tedavi seçeneği olarak hasta tarafından kabul edilmesi, gündüz aşırı uyku hali, hastalığın şiddeti, daha önce geçirilmiş cerrahi operasyon gibi bir- çok farklı nedene bağlıdır. Çalışmamızda, tedavinin kabulünü arttırmak açısından görsel ağırlıklı eğitimin etkileri 196 hasta üzerinde araştırıldı. Hastalar iki gruba ayrılarak bir gruba (n=84) standart muayene ve tetkik yöntemleri uygulandı; diğer gruba ise (n=112), ilk gruptan farklı olarak video film desteği ile birlikte OSAS hastalığı ve sonuçları hakkında görsel ağ ırlıklı bir eğitim de verildi. Eğitim alan hasta grubunda CPAP tedavisini kabul etme oranının (%93), eğitim almayan hasta grubuna göre (%82) anlamlı derecede yüksek olduğu (p<0,05) gözlendi.
226-230

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Strohl KP, Redline S. Recognition of obstructive
sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;
154: 279-289.
2. Partinen M, Jamieson A, Guilleminault C.
Long-term outcome for obstructive sleep apnea
syndrome patients: mortality. Chest 1988; 94:
1200-1204.
3. Zaninelli A, Fariello R, Boni E, Corda L. Snoring
and risk of cardiovascular disease. Int J Cardiol
1991; 32: 347-351.
4. Dyken ME, Somers VK, Yamada T, Ren ZY,
Zimmerman MB. Investigating the relationship
between stroke and obstructive sleep apnea.
Stroke 1996; 27: 401-407.
5. Sanders MH, Constantino JP, Strollo PJ, Studnicki
K, Atwood CW. The impact of split-night
polysomnography for diagnosis and positive
pressure therapy titration on treatment acceptance
and adherence in sleep apnea/hypopnea.
Sleep 2000; 23: 17-24.
6. Kaynak H. Uyku: uyuyamamak mı, uyanamamak
mı? Milliyet Yayınları, İstanbul, AD Kitap
çılık A.Ş, 1998.
7. Philip P, Mitler M. Sleepiness at the wheel:
Symptom or Behavior? Sleep 2000; 23: 119-121.
8. Findley LJ, Unverzagt ME, Suratt PM. Automobile
accidents involving patients with obstructive
sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988; 138:
337-340.
9. Dickins QS, Jenkins NA, Mrad R, Schweitzer
PK, Walsh JK. Nasal continuous positive airway
pressure in the treatment of obstructive sleep
apnea. Oper Tech in Otolaryngol-Head and
Neck Surg 1991; 2: 91-95.
10.American Thoracic Society Board. Indications
and standarts for use of nasal continuous positive
airway pressure (CPAP) in sleep apnea syndromes.
Am J Respis Crit Care Med 1994; 150:
1738-1745.
11. Sullivan CE, Berthon-Jones M, Issa FG, Eves L.
Reversal of obstructive sleep apnea by continuous
positive airway pressure applied through
the nares. Lancet 1981; 1: 862-865.
12.Waldhorn RE, Herrick TW, Nguyen MC, O’Donnell
AE, Sodero J, Potolicchio SJ. Long-term
compliance with nasal continuous positive airway
pressure therapy of obstructive sleep apnea.
Chest 1990; 97: 33-38.
13. Weaver TE, Kribbs NB, Pack AI, Kline LR,
Chugh DK, Maislin G, Smith PL, Schwartz AR,
Schubert NM, Gillen KA, Dinges DF. Night-tonight
variability in CPAP use over the first
three months of treatment. Sleep 1997; 20: 278-
283.
14. Chervin RD, Theut S, Basetti C, Aldrich MS.
Compliance with nasal CPAP can be improved
by simple interventions. Sleep 1997; 20: 284-
289.
16.Delguste P, Rodenstein DO. Compliance, education,
monitoring in the treatment of obstructive
sleep apnea by nasal continuous positive airway
pressure. Sleep 2000; 23: 158-160.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com