You are here

Home » Content

ACİL TIP SİSTEMLERİ

Journal Name:

  • Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The modern era of EMS was created in the last decades with coordinated transport and prehospital interventions, to provide earlier, more intensive care to the community. Successful EMS systems are designed to meet the needs of the communities they serve. The state provides laws that broadly outline what is prudent, safe, and acceptable. To be effective, EMS systems must be planned and operated at the local level. Communities need to identify their individual needs and resources, develop funding mechanisms, and become involved on all levels in structuring the system. The EMS system must provide equal access to all and remain protected from forces that serve the interests of only one group. Medical direction is characterized as either immediate (on-line), or organizational (off-line). The EMS system should train physician surrogates (ie, paramedics) to deliver prehospital care. Physicians providing on-line direction should be appropriately trained and familiar with the operations and limitations of the system. Physician input, leadership, and oversight are essential in ensuring that the medical care provided is safe, effective, and in accordance with accepted standards. Physicians must be empowered and involved in planning, implementing, overseeing, and evaluating all components of the system. The objective of this paper is to outline the field and general features of an EMS system.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Acil Tıp Sistemi (ATS), acil bir yaralanma veya hastalığın bildirilmesinden kesin tedavinin verilmesine dek geçen sürede acil bakımı sağlayan sistemdir. ATS ülkede hükümet, tıbbi direktörler, hastane yönetimi, acil tıbbi teknikerler (ATT), doktorlar ve yardımcı sağlık personelinin ortak çalışmasıyla oluşturulur. Güçlü ve etkili bir ATS, en iyi hizmeti sağlamak için hekim kontrolünü ve çok sayıda hekimin katılmas ını gerektirir. ATS’nin kurulması için tıbbi kontrol ve ekonomik kaynak gereklidir. ATS’ni tasarlayan her ülke, kendine özgü kaynakları ve ihtiya çları belirlemek zorundadır. Ocak-Mart 2003 ACİL TIP SİSTEMLERİ; SOYSAL VE ARK. 57 ATS içeriğindeki temel konular; eğitim, haberleşme ve taşımadır. Eğiticiler, halk ve acil tıbbi teknikerler eğitimi gereklidir. İletişim araçları; acil uygun araç ve personelin sağlanmas ı, zamanında hastanenin bilgilendirilmesi ve uygun tıbbi kontrol için halka yol gösterilmesinde önemli rol oynar. Halk tarafından en fazla kullanılan haberleşme aracı 112 telefonudur. Hastane öncesi acil bakım hizmeti tıbbi direktör denetiminde ATT tarafından yapılmal ıdır. ATT eğitimi 3 düzeyde tanınmaktadır; Temel ATT, orta ATT ve ileri ATT. Ambulanslar tıbbi donanım açısından iki sınıfa ayrı- lır. Temel yaşam desteği ambulanslar temel ATT eğitimi görmüş kişilere uygun ekipman taşır. İleri yaşam desteği ambulanslar paramedik yada ileri tıbbi müdahaleleri yapabilecek daha profesyonel sağlık personeli için uygun ekipman taşır. Bu yazının amacı, ATS’nin sınırlarını belirlemek ve genel tablosunu yansıtmaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-acil-tip-sistemleri.pdf
  • 1
51-57
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Lilja GP, Swor RA. Emergency medical services. In
Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski SJ. Emergency
Medicine A Comprehensive Study Guide 5th ed. New
York, NY: McGraw&Hill 1999; 1-6.
2. Heckman JD, Rosenthal RE, Worsing RA. Orientation. In
Emergency care and transportation of the sick and
õnjured. 3th ed. Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons,
Illinois USA. 2-11.
3. Mustalish AC, Post C. History, In Kuehl AE (ed):
Prehospital Systems and Medical Oversight. St. Louis,
National Association of EMS Physicians, Mosby Lifeline
1994; 3-27.
4. Emergency Medical Servise Systems. In Bryan E,
Bledsoe RS, Porter BR, Bruce RS. Paramedic Emergency
Care. 2nd New York 1994; 16-38.
5. National Association of EMS Physicians, National
association of state EMS directors: position paper: Use of
warning lights and siren in emergency medical vehicle
response and patient transport. Prehosp and Disas Med
1994; 9: 133-136.
6. Callaham M. Quantifying the scanty science of
prehospital emergency care. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 30:
785-790.
7. Parrillo S. www.emedicine.com.emerg.topic812, EMS
and Mass Gathering from Emergency Medicine Systems;
2000.
8. Sofuoğlu MT, Vatansever K, Gezgin Y, et al. Hastane
Öncesi Acil bakõm Hizmetleri In Uçan ES, Çelikli S,
Baruş NÜ: Paramedik. İzmir. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
Rektörlük Matbaasõ 2000; 139-162.
9. Auble TE, Menegazzi JJ, Paris PM. Effect of out of
hospital defibrillation by basic life support providers on
cardiac arrest mortality: A metaanalysis. Ann Emerg Med
1995; 25: 642 -648.
10. Spaite D, Benoit R, Brown D, et al. Uniform prehospital
data elements and definitions: A report from the uniform
prehospital emergency medical services data conference.
Ann Emerg Med 1995; 25: 525-534.
11. Alonso-Serra H, Blanton D, O’Connor RE. Physician
medical direction in EMS. J Prehosp Care 1998; 2: 153-
157.
12. Eisenberg MS, Horwood BT, Cummins RO, et al.
Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: A tale of 29 cities. Ann
Emerg Med 1990; 19: 179-186.
13. Eisenberg MS, Pantridge JF, Cobb LA, Geddes JS. The
revolution and evolution of prehospital cardiac care. Arch
Intern Med 1996; 156: 1611-1615.
14. Becker LB, Pepe PE. Ensuring the effectiveness of
community-wide emergency cardiac care. Ann Emerg
Med 1993; 22: 354-365.
15. Weaver DW, Cerqueira M, Hallstrom AP, et al.
Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic
therapy: The MITI trial. JAMA 1993; 270: 1211-1216.
16. Smith JS, Martin LF, Young WW, Macioce DP. Do
trauma centers improve outcome over non-trauma
centers?: The evaluation of regional trauma care using
discharge abstract data and patient management
categories. J Trauma 1990; 30: 1533-1537.
17. Sampalis JS, Lavoie A, Williams JI, et al. Impact of onsite
care, prehospital time, and level of in-hospital care on
survival in severely injured patients. J Trauma 1993; 34:
252-255.
18. Cayten CG, Murphy JG, Stahl WM. Basic life support
versus advanced life support for injured patients with an
injury severity score of 10 or more. J Trauma 1993; 35:
460.
19. Bickell WH, Wall MJ, Pepe PE, et al. Immediate vs
delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with
penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1105-
1108.
20. Shuster M, Shannon HS. Differential prehospital benefit
from paramedic care. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 23: 1014-
1021.
21. Pediatric Education Task Force, Gaushe M, Henderson
DP, et al. Education of out-of hospital emergency
medical personnel in pediatrics: Report of a national task
force. Ann Emerg Med 1998; 31: 58-64.
22. Joyce SM, Brown DE, Nelson EA. Epidemiology of
pediatric EMS practice: A multistate analysis. Prehosp
and Disas Med 1996; 11: 180-184.
23. Gausche M, Lewis RJ, Stratton SJ, et al. A prospective,
randomized study of the effect of out-of-hospital
pediatric intubation on patient outcome. Acad Emerg
Med 1998; 5: 428.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com