You are here

Home » Content

175 YÜZ KIRIKLI HASTANIN RETROSPEKTİF İNCELENMESİ

Journal Name:

  • Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Face is commonly injured part of the body which is cosmetically important. The purpose of this study was to analyze etiology of facial fractures, age groups of patients, time of injury, locations of facial fractures, method of treatment. Results.- Total of 175 patients with facial fractures treated between January 1997 and December 2001 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were between 4 and 78 years of age. The male: female ratio was 4:1. The most common cause of injury was traffic accidents (79 patients). The largest number of fractures was found in mandibula. The number of patients suffering facial trauma was increasing in the summer months, on holidays and at night. Conclusion.- Face is a cosmetically important anatomic region of the body. For this reason, facial fractures must be restored. Prevention of etiologies of facial fractures is also important.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yüz, vücudun travmalara açık kozmetik açıdan en önemli bölgesidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; kliniğimizde tedavi edilen yüz kırıklarının etyolojilerini, hastaların yaş gruplarını, mevsimsel oluş zamanlarını, fraktür lokalizasyonlarını, uygulanan tedavi yöntemlerini analiz etmek ve sonuçlarını sunmaktır. Kliniğimize Ocak 1997 ile Aralık 2001 tarihleri arasında başvuran toplam 175 yüz kırıklı hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi. Sunduğumuz seride en genç hasta 4 yaşında, en yaşlı hasta 78 yaşında idi. Erkek: kadın oranı 4:1 olarak tespit edildi. Hastaların 79’unda etyoloji trafik kazalarıydı. En çok kırılan kemik mandibula idi. Yaz aylarında, tatil günlerinde ve geceleri yüz kırıklarında artış olduğu gözlendi. Yüz kozmetik açıdan önemli bir anatomik vücut bölgesidir. Fasiyal kırıkların tanı ve tedavisinin yanısıra neden olan etyolojilerin önlenmeside önemlidir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-175-yuz-kirikli-hastanin-retrospektif-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
8-13
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Hogg NJ, Stewart TC, Jerrold Armstrong EA, et al. Epidemiology of
maxillofacial injuries at trauma hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between 1992 and
1997. J Trauma 2000; 49: 425-432.
1. Afzelius LE, Rosen C. Facial fractures. A review of 368 cases. Int J Oral Surg 1980; 9: 25-32.
2. O’Sullivan ST, Snyder BJ, Moore MH, et al. Outcome measurement of the treatment of maxillary fractures: a prospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Plast Surg 1999, 52, 519-523.
3. Akbas H, Uysal A. 156 mandibula fraktürlü olgunun retrospektif analizi. Turk Plast Cer Derg 2001; 2: 116-119.
8
4. Sojot AJ, Meisami T, Sandor GKB,et al. The epidemiology of mandibular fractures treated at the Toronto general hospital: A review of 246 cases. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001; 67: 640-644.
5. Iida S, Kogo M, Sugiura T, et al. Retrospective analiysis of 1502 patients with facial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2001; 30: 286-290.
6. Gassner R, Tuli T, Hachl O, et al. Cranio-maxillofacial trauma: a 10 year review of 9,543 cases with 21,067 injuries. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003; 31: 51-61.
7. Alvi A, Doherty T, Lewen G. Facial fractures and concomitant injuries in trauma patients. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 102-106.
8. Scherer M, Sullivan WG, Smith DJ Jr, et al. An analysis of 1,423 facial fractures in 788 patients at an urban trauma center. J Trauma. 1989; 29(3): 388-390.
9. Tanaka N, Tomitsuka K, Shionoya K, et al. Aetiology of maxillofacial fracture. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 32: 19-23.
10. Iida S, Hassfeld S, Reuther T, et al. Maxillofacial fractures resulting from falls. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003; 31: 278-283.
11. Hill CM, Crosher RF, Carroll MJ, et al. Facial fractures--the results of a prospective four-year-study. J Maxillofac Surg 1984; 12: 267-270.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com