You are here

Home » Content

ÇOCUĞUN YAŞ, CİNSİYET, BİLİŞSEL YETENEK VE ANAOKULUNA GİTMESİNİN ANNENİN EV KADINLIĞI TUTUMUNA ETKİSİ

Journal Name:

  • Cerrahpaşa Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The influence on maternal housekeeping of age, gender, cognitive efficiency and playschool attendance of the child was investigated from a survey of mothers and their 90 preschoolers of high-middle-class whose mean age was 69.2 SD3,5 mo. and of whom 56 (62%) were boys and 34 (38%) were girls. The cognitive ability of the children was assessed with Stanford Binet-12- oral questions and “Draw me a child picture” Goodenough criteria. The Protective attitude showed a positive correlation both with a democratic and oppressive approach. Indeed, mothers of boys were more protective (-0.13 versus -6.06), democratic (0.18 versus -3.03), oppressive (1.79 versus -6.06), but at the same time repining more about spouse disharmony (0.25 versus -9.09). Moreover, mothers of home-staying children were more democratic (0.85 versus -2.33, p=0.03**, for boys; 0.11 versus -8.33, for girls) than those of playschool attendees. In fact, mothers of home-staying boys were less protective (-7.69 versus -0.14) but at the same time more repulsive to house-work (-7.69 versus 0.16). Spouse disharmony increased maternal protection for all children (0.465***), especially for girl attendees (0.556***). On the other hand, disharmonious mothers of home-staying boys showed a repulsion to house-work (0.270*) inversely correlated with age (-0.268*) or cognitive development (-0.272*) of the child.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Toplumun orta-üst ekonomik statüdeki aile-lerinden örneklenen ve yaş ortalaması 69,2 SS3,5 ay olan 34’ü (%38) kız ve 56’sı (%62) erkek, toplam 90 çocuğun; yaş, cinsiyet, biliş-sel yetenek ve anaokuluna gidiyor olmasının, annenin ev kadınlığı tutumuna etkileri araştı-rıldı. Demokrat annenin bir o kadar baskıcı ol-duğu ve bu iki tutumun anne koruyuculuğu ile pozitif korelasyon gösterdiği anlaşıldı. Örneğin anne; erkeklere, kız çocuğuna olduğundan da-ha koruyucu (-0,13’a karşın -6,06), demokrat (0,18’a karşın -3,03) ve baskıcı (1,79’a karşın -6,06) idi. Öte yandan, anaokuluna gitmeyen (annenin yakın koruma alanı içinde olan) erke-ğin annesi (-7,69’a karşın -0,14) daha az koru-yucu idi ve ev kadınlığını daha fazla (-7,69’a karşın 0,16) benimsiyordu. Erkek anneleri eş-ler arası uyumsuzluktan daha fazla (0,25’a kar-şın -9,09) yakındı ve çocuğun yaşı (-0,268*) ve başarısı (-0,272*) ile ters orantılı olarak ev ka-dınlığını reddettiler (0.270*). Öte yandan, eşler arası uyumsuzluk, annenin (kızlarda daha be-lirgin olmak üzere, 0,556***). koruyucu ve baskıcı tutumunu arttırırken (0,465 ***), de-mokrat tutumunu azalttı ve ev kadınlığını red-detmesini kolaylaştırdı. Erkek annesi, eşler arası uyumsuzluktan daha çok yakınıyor (0.270*) ve çocuğun yaşı (-0,268*) ve başarısı (-0,272*) ile ters orantılı olarak ev kadınlığını reddediyordu. Sonuçlar, bağlanma teorisi ve davranış bi-lim kuramları ile açıklanmaya çalışıldı. Anne koruyuculuğunun “annenin kaybetme kaygısı” başlığı altında, diğer anne davranışlarından farklı, genetik materyali korumaya yönelik fi-lojenik bir davranış olarak değerlendirilmesi gerektiği üzerinde duruldu.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cocugun-yas-cinsiyet-bilissel-yetenek-anaokuluna-gitmesinin-annenin-ev-kadinligi-tutumuna-etkisi.pdf
  • 4
181-187
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Holland JG, Skinner BF. The Analysis of Behavior. NY:Mc-Graw Hill, 1961.
2. Vaughan ME. Rule-governed behavior and higher mental processes. In: S Modgil & C Modgil (eds). BF Skinner: Consensus and Controversy. Barcombe, England: Falmer Press. 257-64, 1987.
3. Michael J. Supplements to Accompany Concepts and principles of Behavior Analysis. 2nd ed 1-54, 2000.
4. Maughan A, Cicchetti D. Impact of child maltreatment and interadult violence on children's emotion regulation abilities and socioemotional adjustment. Child Dev. 2002; 73: 1525-42.
5. El-Sheikh M. Children's emotional and physiological responses to interadult angry behavior: The role of history of interparental hostility. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1994; 22: 661-78.
6. Miller PH. Children's reasoning about the causes of human behavior. J Exp Child Psychol. 1985; 39: 343-62.
7. White C, Barrowclough C. Depressed and non-depressed mothers with problematic preschoolers: Attributions for child behaviors. Br J Clin Psychol. 1998; 37: 385-98.
8. Boyatzis CJ, Chazan E, Ting CZ. Preschool children's decoding of facial emotions. J Genet Psychol. 1993; 154: 375-82.
9. Shih AR, von Baeyer CL. Preschool children's seriation of pain faces and happy faces in the Affective Facial Scale. Psychol Rep. 1994; 74: 659-65.
10. Alessandri SM, Lewis M. Differences in pride and shame in maltreated and nonmaltreated preschoolers. Child Dev. 1996; 67: 1857-69.
11. Hart CH, DeWolf DM, Wozniak P, Burts DC. Maternal and paternal disciplinary styles: Relations with preschoolers' playground behavioral orientations and peer status. Child Dev. 1992; 63: 879-92.
12. Denham SA, Blair KA, DeMulder E, Levitas J, Sawyer K, Auerbach-Major S, Queenan P. Preschool emotional competence: pathway to social competence? Child Dev. 2003; 74: 238-56.
Ekim-Aralık 2004 ÇOCUK İLE ANNENİN EV KADINLIĞI TUTUMU; KESKİN
187
13. Denham SA, Caverly S, Schmidt M, Blair K, DeMulder E, Caal S, Hamada H, Mason T. Preschool understanding of emotions: Contributions to classroom anger & aggression. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002; 43: 901-16.
14. Arend R, Gove FL, Sroufe LA Continuity of individual adaptation from infancy to kindergarten: A predictive study of ego-resiliency and curiosity in preschoolers. Child Dev. 1979; 50: 950-9.
15. Mauro CF, Harris YR. The influence of maternal child-rearing attitudes and teaching behaviors on preschoolers' delay of gratification. J Genet Psychol. 2000; 161: 292-306.
16. Hastings PD, Coplan R. Conceptual and empirical links between children's social spheres: Relating maternal beliefs and preschoolers' behaviors with peers. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 1999; 86: 43-59.
17. Strand PS. Coordination of maternal directives with preschoolers' behavior: Influence of maternal coordination training on dyadic activity and child compliance. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002; 31: 6-15.
18. Gardner FE. The quality of joint activity between mothers and their children with behavior problems J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1994; 35: 935-48.
19. Arnold EH, O'Leary SG. The effect of child negative affect on maternal discipline behavior. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1995; 23: 585-95.
20. Stipek DJ, Ryan RH. Economically disadvantaged preschoolers: ready to learn but further to go. Dev Psychol. 1997; 33: 711-23.
21. Van Asperen de Boer S. [The Stanford-Binet test in the determination of high intellectual level.] Ned Tijdschr Psychol. 1960; 15: 47-82.
22. Ansbacher HL. The Goodenough draw a-man test and primary mental abilities. J Consult Psychol. 1952; 16: 176-80.
23. Zuckerman M, Bibback BB, Monashkin I, Norton JA Jr. Normative data and factor analysis on the Parental Attitude Research Instrument.J Consult Psychol. 1958; 22: 165-71.
24. Strand PS. Coordination of maternal directives with preschoolers' behavior: Influence of maternal coordination training on dyadic activity and child compliance. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002; 31: 6-15.
25. Collins WA, Maccoby EE, Steinberg L, Hetherington EM, Bornstein MH. Contemporary research on parenting. The case for nature and nurture. Am Psychol. 2000; 55: 218-32.
26. Bowlby J.Children generate "internal working models of attachment" that influence the organization of their attachment-seeking behaviors. Psychiatry. 1996; 59: 20-33.
27. Bretherton I. Bowlby's legacy to developmental psychology. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1997; 28: 33-43.
28. Ainsworth MS. The personal origins of attachment theory. An interview with Mary Salter Ainsworth. Interview by PeterL. Rudnytsky. Psychoanal Study Child. 1997;52:386-405.
29. Broberg AG. A review of interventions in the parent-child relationship informed by attachment theory. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2000; 89: 37-42
30. Blum HP. Separation-individuation theory and attachment theory. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2004; 52: 535-53.
Teşekkür: Yazar bu çalışmanın gerçekleşmesine olanak yaratan İstanbul Bakırköy Eğitimciler Koleji yönetici öğ-retmenlerine ve rehberlik birimine, ayrıca istatistik değer-lendirmelerini gerçekleştiren Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Halk Sağlığı Anabilim Dalı, Öğretim Üyesi Yrd. Doç. Dr. Günay Can’a teşekkürlerini sunar

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com