Investigating Student Use of Electronic Support Tools and Mathematical Reasoning

Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K.R. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a Cognitive Tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16, 101-128.
Anderson-Inman, L. & Horney, M. (1996). Computer-based concept mapping: Enhancing literacy tools for visual thinking. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40, 302-306.
Bernbaum Wilmont, D. (2012). Math reasoning inventory. (Technical Report) Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions, Scholastic.
Burns, M. (2012). Math reasoning inventory. Retrieved July 22, 2013 from www.mathreasoninginventory.com
Crawford, L., & Freeman, B. (2011). The Math Learning Companion: Initial research into two
curriculum components. Presentation at Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. Washington D.C., September 8-10, 2011.
19
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 7(1), 1-24
Crawford, L., Higgins, K., & Freeman. B. (2012). Exploring the use of computer based electronic
support tools by students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18(3), 135-144.
Crawford, L., Higgins, K., D'Angelo, J. & Hall, L. (2016). Use of active electronic support tools in mathematics. Manuscript under review.
D'Angelo, J., Higgins, K., & Crawford, L. (2016). Technology, affective characteristics and mathematics: A review of the literature from 1985-2013. Manuscript under review.
Digital Directions International (2005). HELPMath. Retrieved July 2, 2014 from http://www.helpprogram.net
Digital Directions International (2013). Math Learning Companion. Retrieved July 2, 2014 from www.mathlearningcompanion.net
Englert, C., Manalo, M., & Zhao, Y. (2004). I can do it better: The effects of technology enabled
scaffolding on young writers' composition. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(1), 5¬22.
Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2010). Teachers attending to students' mathematical reasoning: Lessons from an after-school research program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,
14(1), 49-66.
Hanushek, E.A., Peterson, P.E., & Woessman, L. (2012). Achievement growth: International and
U.S. state trends in student performance. Program on Education Policy & Governance report No: 12-03. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Kramarski, B., & Zeichner, O. (2001). Using technology to enhance mathematical reasoning: Effects of feedback and self-regulation learning. Educational Media International, 38(2/3), 77-82.
Mevarech, Z.R. & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching
mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms, American Educational Research Journal, 34,
365-394.
Miller, R.G. (1981). Simultaneous statistical inference. 2nd ed. (pp. 6-8), New York NY: Springer-Verlag.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School
Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.No Child Left Behind [NCLB] Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107¬110, 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2009). Guiding principles for mathematics curriculum and assessment. Retrieved on August 11, 2014 from http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=23273
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013a). Lessons from PISA 2012 for the United States, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. Retrieved on
20
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 7(1), 1-24
September 9, 2014 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264207585-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Makes Schools Successful? Resources, Policies and Practices (Volume IV). Retrieved on September 10, 2014 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201156-en
O'Donnell, A.M. (2006). Introduction: Learning with technology. In A.M. O'Donnell, C.E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.) Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology (pp. 1-14), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reasoning [Def. 1]. (2014) Merriam Webster Online. Retrieved July 7, 2014, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reasoning
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529-556.
Rosenstein, J.G., Caldwell, J.H., & Crown, W.D. (1996). New Jersey Mathematics Curriculum
Framework: A collaborative effort of the New Jersey Mathematics Coalition and the New Jersey Department of Education. New Brunswick, NJ: The New Jersey Mathematics Coalition, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Tran, Z. (2005). Help with English Language Proficiency "HELP" program evaluation of sheltered instruction multimedia lessons [White paper]. Retrieved from www.helpprogram.net
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2010). Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
Yian-Shu, C., Haw-Ching, Y., Shian-Shyong, T., & Che-Ching, Y. (2014). Implementation of a model-tracing-based learning diagnosis system to promote elementary students' learning in mathematics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 347-357.