You are here

The Effect of Particle Size on The Migration Rate of Knickpoint Erosion at Different Hydraulic Conditions

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Knickpoint, gully or head cut is called the erosion that is formed because of the sudden change in water level or bed level in the river and after concentrating the flow lines the local shear stress increase, bring about the bed erosion rate be intensified in a location where sudden change bed takes place. This erosion causes the riverbed in the location of sudden slope change to migrate to the upstream and makes the width of the river change. This erosion creates irreparable damages. Destruction of upstream structures caused by the bed migration and also roads destruction, residential areas, tourism - recreational areas, farmlands and good vegetation cover can be mentioned. In this paper, we have studied the effect of particle size and various hydraulic conditions to the rate of Knickpoint erosion progression. In this paper to create the relations of migration rate to the upstream according to the hydraulic parameters a laboratory hydraulic flume with dimensions 3 meters in length, width 30cm and height 50 cm was used. The main purpose of the paper is to creating relations for predicting the rate of Knickpoint erosion rates increase in the non-cohesive soil.
200
213

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Admiraal, D. (2007).“Weir, Sluice Gate, and Culvert Literature Related to G304/G306 Control
Structures: A Literature Review.” Prepared for the Operations and Hydro Data Management
Division of The South Florida Water Management District.
[2] Adrian, R.J. (1991). “Particle-Imaging Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics.”
Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 23(2): 261-304
[3] Begin, Ze’ev B. Schumm, Stanley A. Meyer, David F. (1980). “Knickpoint Migration due to
Baselevel Lowering.” Journal of the Waterway Port and Ocean Division, 106 (3): 369-388.
[4] Brush, Lucien M. Jr. Wolman, M Gordon. (1960).“Knickpoint Behavior in Non-Cohesive
Material: A Laboratory Study.” The Geological Society of America Bulletin, 71(1): 59-74
[5] Chen, A.H., Rus, D.L., Stanton, C.P. (1999).“Trends in Channel Gradation in Nebraska
Streams, 1913-95” USGS, Water Resources Investigations Report 99-4103,
[6] Chow, Ven Te, Open Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, Daniels, R.B.(1960). Entrenchment
of the Willow Drainage Ditch, Harrison County, Iowa. American Journal of Science. 258:161-
76
[7] Daniels, R.B., and R.H. Jordan. (1966). Physiographic history and the soils, entrenched stream
systems and gullies, Harrison County, Iowa. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical
Bulletin.
[8] Frankel, Kurt L. Pazzaglia, Frank J. Vaughn, Jordan D.(2013) “Knickpoint evolution in a
vertically bedded substrate, upstream-dipping terraces, and Atlantic slope bedrock channel.”
The Geological Society of America Bulletin,119 (4): 476-486.
[9] Fujita, I., Muste, M., and Kruger, A. (1998).“Large-scale particle image velocimetry for flow
analysis in hydraulic engineering applications.” Journal of Hydraulic Research, 36( 3): 397-
414.
[10] Gardner, T.W.(1983). “Experimental study of knickpoint and longitudinal profile evolution in
cohesive, homogeneous material.” The Geological Society of America Bulletin, 94(5): 664-72
[11] Hanson, G.J. Robinson, K. M. Cook, K. R. (2001).“Prediction of Headcut Migration using a
Deterministic Approach.” Transactions of the ASAE, 44(3): 525-531.
[12] Holland, W. N. Pickup, G.(1976). “Flume Study of Knickpoint Development in Stratified
Sediment.” The Geological Society of America Bulletin, 87( 1): 76-82.
[13] Iowa Environmental Mesonet (2013) http://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu.
[14] Meselhe, E.A., Bradley, A.A., Kruger, A., Muste, M.V.I., (2002).“Low Flow Measurement in
Streams Using Video Imagery.” Water Resources Research, 38( 12):34-45
[15] Muste, M., Fujita, I., Hauet, A. (2008).“Large-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry for
Measurements in Riverine Enviroments.” Water Resources Research, 44(19):32-45
[16] Papanicolaou, T. (2008)“The Effects of Headcut and Knickpoint Propagation on Bridges in
Iowa” TR-541 Iowa Department of Transportation.
[17] Raffel, M. Willert, C. Kompenhans, J.(1998). Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide.
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,3(4):35-50
[18] Robinson, K. M. “Hydraulic Stresses on an Overfall Boundary.” Transactions of the ASAE,
Vol. 32, No. 4, 1989, pp. 1269-1274.
[19] Robinson, K. M. Hanson, G. J. “A deterministic headcut advance model.” Transactions of the
ASAE, Vol. 37, No. 5, 1994, pp. 1437-1443.
[20] Robinson, K.M. Cook, K. R. Hanson, G.J. “Velocity Field Measurements at an Overfall”
Transactions of the ASAE, Vol. 43, No. 3, May/June 2000, pp. 665-670.
[21] Rus, D.L. Dietsch, B.J. Simon, A. “Stream Adjustment and Channel Widening in Eastern
Nebraska” USGS, Water Resources Investigations Report 03-4003, 2003
[22] Simon, Andrew. Rinaldi, Massimo. “Channel instability in the loess area of the Midwestern
United States.” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2000.
pp. 133-150.
AGHAZADEGAN, BEJESTAN, SEDGHI, JAHROMI, KHOSROJERDI
213
[23] Simon, A. and R.E. Thomas, Processes and forms of an unstable alluvial system with resistant,
cohesive streambeds. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 27:699-718, 2002.
[24] Simon, A., R.E. Thomas, A.J.C. Collison, and W. Dickerson, Erodibility of cohesive
streambeds in the Yalobusha River system. Research Report No. 26. USDA-ARS National
Sedimentation Laboratory: Oxford, MS, 2002.
[25] Stein, O. R. Julien, P. Y. “Criterion delineating the mode of headcut migration.” ASCE Journal
of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 119, No. 37, 1993, pp. 37-50.
[26] Stein, Otto R. LaTray, Bean A. “Experiments and modeling of headcut migration in stratified
soils.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 38, No. 12, 11 December 2002.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com