You are here

Home » Content

GELİR EŞİTSİZLİĞİ ÖLÇÜMÜNDE KULLANILAN YÖNTEMLER

The Methods of Income Inequality Measurement

Journal Name:

  • Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2001

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Inequality is undoubtly a mathmetical fact. First of all, some social facts need to be be formulized when we transform this fact to the social area. Inequality implies the poverty and the prosperity whose meanings are opposite to each other. Many economists have dealt on this concept and tried to develope various methods related with inequality measurement.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Eşitsizlik şüphesiz matematiksel bir olgudur. Bu olguyu toplumsal alana taşıdığımızda öncelikle bazı sosyal olguları formülleştirmek gerekebilir. Eşitsizlik sosyal anlamda birbiriyle zıt iki anlam ifade eden yoksulluk ve gönenç kavramlarını içine alır. Pek çok iktisatçı bu kavram üzerinde durmuş ve eşitsizlik ölçümlerine ilişkin farklı yöntemler geliştirmeye çalışmışlardır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-gelir-esitsizligi-olcumunde-kullanilan-yontemler.pdf
  • 1
47-65
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Amiel, Y., 1998, “The Subjective Approach to the Measuremenet of Income Inequality”, in
Silber, J.,(ed) Income Inequality Measurement: From Theory to Practice,
Kluwer, Dewenter.
Amiel, Y., and F.A. Cowell, 1998, “Distributional Ordering and The Transfer Principle: A
Re-examination”, Research on Economic Inequality, 8: 195-215.
Atkinson, A.B., 1983, The Economics of Inequality 2nd Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Cowell, F.A., 1980, “ On the Structure of Additive Inequalty Measures” Review of
Economic Studies, 47:52131
Cowell, F.A., 1985, “Measures of Distributional Change: An Axiomatic Approach”
Review of Economic Studies, 52:135-51.
Cowell, F.A., and S.P. Jenkins, 1995, “How Much Inequality can we Explain? A
Methodology and an Application to the USA” Economic Journal, 105: 421-30.
Fields, G.S., 1997, Poverty, Inequality and development, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
Foster, J., J. Greer and E. Thorbecke, 1984, “A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures”
Econometrica, 52: 761-5.
Harrison, E., and C. Seidl, 1994, “Acceptance of Distributional Axioms: Experimental
Findings”, Public Choice, 19:61-81.
Jenkins, S.P., 1995, “Accounting for Inequality Trends: Decomoposition Analysis of Rural
China”, PhD, Dissertation, London School of Economics.
Mookerjee, D., and A. Shorrocks, 1982, “A Decomposition Analysis of the Trend in UK
Income Inequality”, Economic Journal, 92:886-902.
Pen, J., 1974, Income Distribution, 2nd Edition, Penguin, Harmondsworth..
Sen, A.K., 1973 On Economic Inequality, Oxford Universty Press, London.
Sen, A.K.,(1976) “Poverty: an Ordinal Approach to Measurement” Econometrica, 44.
Theil, H., 1979, “The Measurement of Inequality by Components of Income”, Economics
Letters, 2: 197-9.
Türkiye Sanayi ve İşadamları Derneği, Türkiye’de Bireysel Gelir Dağılımı ve Yoksulluk,
Taslak, Yayın No: TÜSİAD-T/2000-12/..)
Ufuk Başoğlu, N. Ölmezoğulları, İ. Parasız, 1999, Gelir Bölüşümü (Teori ve Politika) Ekin
Yayınları, Bursa.
Zellner, A., 1962 “An efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and
Tests for Aggregation Bias”, Journal of the American Statistical Association,
57:346-368.
1994 Hanehalkı Gelir Dağılımı Sonuçları, DİE, Ankara, 1994.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com