You are here

Home » Content

DURGUN DURUM BÜYÜMEDEN İÇSEL BÜYÜMEYE

From Steady State Growth to Endogenous Growth

Journal Name:

  • Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2002

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study the neoclassical steady-state (Solowian) growth model has been compared with the endogenous growth models proposed by Lucas’s human capital model and Rivera-Batiz and Romer’s R&D model. In the neoclassical growth model that is based on the diminishing returns, the rich countries falling into a steady state by the time and the poor countries that follow their growth path catch up them. Whereas, in the endogenous growth model, diminishing returns do not come out in the rich countries and they do not fall into a steady state, due to the specific knowledge made use of in many different production areas at the same time and the brain drain flows to rich countries from poor countries. Integration of countries similarly developed is considered as useful since they benefit from each others’ knowledge stock. The state regains the strategic importance by adding positive contributions to knowledge, human capital and technological change in endogenous growth models.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada neoklasik durgun durum (Solowyan) büyüme modeli ile içsel büyüme modelleri (Lucas’ın beşeri sermaye, Rivera-Batiz ve Romer’in Ar-Ge modeli) karşılaştırılmaktadır. Azalan verimlere dayalı neoklasik büyüme modelinde zengin ülkeler zamanla durgun duruma girmekte ve onların gelişme yolunu takip eden yoksul ülkeler onları yakalamaktadır. Oysa içsel büyüme modelinde aynı bilgi aynı anda birden çok üretim alanında kullanılabildiği ve yoksul ülkelerden zengin ülkelere doğru beyin göçü olduğu için, zengin ülkelerde azalan verimler ortaya çıkmamakta ve bu ülkeler durgun duruma girmemektedir. Birbirlerinin bilgi stokundan yararlanacakları için benzer gelişmişlik düzeyine sahip ülkeler arasındaki entegrasyon yararlı görülmektedir. Bu modelde devlet bilgi, beşeri sermaye ve teknolojik gelişmeye yapacağı olumlu katkılar yüzünden yeniden stratejik bir önem kazanmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-durgun-durum-buyumeden-icsel-buyumeye.pdf
  • 1
1-15
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory, second
printing, the MIT press, Cambridge, London, England.
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1994), “The Production and Distribution of Knowledge”, in
The Economics of Growth and Technical Change, Gerald Silverberg and Luc Soete
(ed), Edward Elgar Publishing, England; 9-20.
Domar, E. (1970), “Capital Expansion and Growth”, in Growth Economics, Amartya
Sen (ed), Penguin Modern Economics Selected Readings, Penguin Books,
Harmondsworth Middlesex, England, 1970; 65-77.
Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman (1994), “Endogenous Innovation in the
Theory of Growth”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 8, Number 1, Winter
1994; 23-44.
Harrod, R. F. (1970), “Dynamic Theory”, in Growth Economics, Amartya Sen (ed),
Penguin Modern Economics Selected Readings, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth
Middlesex, England, 1970; 43-64.
Lau, L. J. (1996), “The Sources of Long Term Economic Growth: Observations from
the Experience of Developed and Developing Countries” in The Mosaic of Economic
Growth, R. Landau, T. Taylor and G. Wrigths (eds), Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
Lucas, R. E. (1988), “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”, Journal of
Monetary Economics, 22, North-Holland; 3-42.
Mankiw, N. Gregory, David Romer and D. N. Weil (1992), “A Contribution to the
Empirics of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1992; 407-37.
Ochaa, Orlando O. (1996), Growth, Trade and Endogenous Technology: A Study of
OECD Manufacturing, New York , St. Martin Press.
OECD (1998), Economic Outlook, June 1998.
Rivera-Batiz, Luis A. and Paul M. Romer (1991a), “International Trade with
Endogenous Technological Change”, European Economic Review, North Holland,
35 (1991); 971-1004.
Rivera-Batiz, Luis A. and Paul M. Romer (1991b), “Economic Integration and
Endogenous Growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 1991; 531-55.
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres (1999), “Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse
Societies: Economic Performance in Europe”, Growth and Change, Vol. 30
(Winter 1999); 75-105.
Romer, David (1996), Advanced Macroeconomics, The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
Romer, Paul M. (1986), “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of
Political Economy, 94(5); 1002-37.
Romer, Paul M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political
Economy, 98-5, Sp. Issue; S71-S102.
Romer, Paul M. (1994), “The Origins of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Economic
Perspectives, vol: 8, num: 1; 3-22.
Sengupta, Jati K. (1999), New Growth Theory: An Applied Perspective, Edward Elgar,
Cheltanham.
Shaw, G. K. (1992), “Policy Implications of Endogenous Growth Theory”, The
Economic Journal, 102 (412); 611-21.
Solow, Robert M. (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”,
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70; 65-94.
Taymaz, Erol (1993), “Sanayi ve Teknoloji Politikaları: Amaçlar ve Araçlar”,
ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, Cilt 20; 549-580.
Temple, Jonathan (1999), “A Positive Effect of Human Capital on Growth”,
Economic Letters 65, Elsevier Science; 131034).
Wong, Kar-yiu and Chong Kee Yip (1999), “Education, Economic Growth, and
Brain Drain”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 23 (1999); 699-726.
World Bank (1998/1999), World Development Report: Knowledge for
Development.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com