You are here

Home » Content

ÇİN: WASHİNGTON UZLAŞMASINDAN BEİJİNG UZLAŞMASINA

China: From Washington Consensus to Beijing Consensus

Journal Name:

  • Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
There has been an international discussion about Beijing Consensus and Chinese economic model since the beginning of new century. The well-known phrase “Washington Consensus” is combination of ideas gathered from International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, and the U.S. Treasury and the purpose of this collaboration is to bring development to the emerging countries. On the other hand, China has refused to apply these economic regulations set by Washington Consensus instead applied its own system and regulations and this is called as Beijing Consensus. China’s new economic model has been very successful with a small number of problems. China’s success trend could be used for many developing countries.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yeni yüzyılın başlangıcında, Beijing Uzlaşması ve Çin Modeli konusunda uluslararası bir tartışma ortaya çıkmıştır. Neo-liberalizmin gerçek kabul edilebilirliği temeline dayanan Washington Uzlaşması ABD Hükümeti ve uluslararası finansal kurumlar tarafından temel rehber prensipler olarak kabul edilen ve şok terapiye dayanan bir politikalar setidir. Çin, bu politikalar setini uygulamayı reddetmiş ve kendi geliştirdiği, Beijing Uzlaşması olarak adlandırılan yeni bir politik modeli uygulamıştır. Bu politikalar bazı aksaklıklarına rağmen oldukça başarılı bir performans sergilemiştir. Çin’in yakalamış olduğu bu başarılı çizgi, kalkınma yolunda olan birçok ülkeye günümüzde de yol gösterir niteliktedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cin-washington-uzlasmasindan-beijing-uzlasmasina.pdf
  • 1
61-73
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Bernstam Michael S, and Alvin Rabushka, (2002), “Beijing Consensus for
Russia?”, www.Russianeconomy.org. 2002.
Buira, Ariel (2004), “The Dogmatizm of the Washington Consensus”, FONDAD,
The Hague, December. www.fondad.org.
Cox, M. W. and J Koo (2003), “China : Awakening Giant”, Federal Reserve Bank
of Dallas, www.dallasfed.org.,September 2003.
CPD-Dialogue Report 12 (2003), “Beyond the Washington Consensus: Lessons
From China’s Development Experience”, www.cpd-bangladesh.org,
16.05.2003.
Deik (2003), “Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti Ekonomisi ve Türkiye İlişkileri” .
Economist (2004), “Economic Structure”, www.economist.com, 08.03.2005.
Fan Chengze Simon (1999), “Çin Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarını
Çekmede Neden Başarılıdır: İşlem Maliyetleri Yaklaşımı” (Çev. Bekir
Gövdere), DTM, Dış Ticaret Dergisi, S.13.
IMF (2005), World Economic Outlook, September 2005.
Galbraith, James K (2000), “Sustainable Development and the Open-Door Policy
in China”, UTIP Working Paper, No.16, www.utexas.edu.
Herr, Hansjörg and Jan Priewe (2005), “Beyond the »Washington Consensus«:
Macroeconomic Policies for Development” IPG 2.
Naim, Moises (1999), “Fads and Fashion in Economic Reforms: Washington
Consensus or Washington Confusion?”, Foreign Policy Magazine.,
www.imf.org., October 26, 1999.
Ning, Su (2004), “At the Conference of Montreal”, Canada, June 9,
www.pbc.gov.cn, 17.09.2004.
Ortiz, Guillermo (2003), “Overcoming Reform Fatigue”, Finance and
Development, www.imf.org., 30.09.2003.
Parasız, İlker (2003), Büyüme Teorileri, Ezgi yay., Bursa.
Parasız, İlker (2003), İkinci Kuşak Kalkınma Politikaları ve Reformlar, Ezgi yay.,
Bursa.
Perkins, Dwight (1994), “Completing China’s Move to the Market”, The Journal
of Economic Perspectives, Volume 8, Issue 2.
Ramo, Jash (2004), “Beijing Consensus Replace Washington Consensus as Model
in Developing World”, Trade Foreign Policy Press Release, 10.05.2004.
Ramo, Jashua Cooper (2004), “China Has Discovered İts Own Economic
Consensus”, The Foreing Policy Center, Financial Times, 08.05.2004.
Singh, Kavaljit (2002), “From Beijing Consensus to Washington Consensus:
Chinas’s Journey to Liberalization are Globalization”, Asia-Pasific
Research Network, www.aprnet.org., 2002.
UNCTAD (2004) , World Invetsment Report 2004, UN, New York and Cenova.
UNCTAD (2005), World Invetsment Report 2005, UN, New York and Cenova.
Williamson, John (2000), “What Should the World Bank Think About the
Washington Consensus?”, The World Bank Research Observer, Vol.15,
No.2.
Williamson, John (2003), “From Reform Agenda”, Finance and Development,
www.imf.org., 30.09.2003.
Williamson, John (2004), The Washington Consensus as Policy Prescription for
Development, Delivered at the World Bank on January 13, 2004.
Williamson, John (2005), “A Short History of the Washington Consensus”,
www.iie.com/publication,. 2005.
Wolfensohn, James D (2004), “Development and Poverty Reduction Looking Back
Looking Ahead”, Annual Meetings of the World Bank and IMF,
www.worldbank.org., 10.11. 2005
WTO, (2005) World Trade in 2004–2005, Erişim: www.wto.org, 7 Şubat 2006.
Zeng, Douglas Zhihua (2005), “China’s Employment Challenges and Startegies
After the WTO Accession”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper
No:3522.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com