You are here

Home » Content

ÖRGÜT KURAMININ TEMELLERİ

Foundations of Organizational Theory

Journal Name:

  • Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study seek for answers to questions of how organizational theory emerge, which foundations are basis for it, and completeness of these foundations. On this context, different organizational studies and perspectives developed are discussed, and divergent and convergent points are tried to be presented. A common definition for the concept of organization is searched with regard to different perspectives. The study argues deficiencies of the perspectives and thus suggests that organization theory is not based on a complete set of perspectives or thoughts. The study finally offers new researches for new perspectives.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma örgüt kuramının nasıl ortaya çıktığı, hangi temeller üzerinde durduğu ve bu temellerin ne kadar tamamlanmış olduğu sorularına cevap aramaktadır. Bu çerçevede farklı örgüt çalışmaları ve geliştirilen perspektifler incelenmekte, örgütlerin ayrışan ve birleşen yönleri ortaya koyulmaya çalışılmaktadır. Örgüt kuramındaki farklı perspektifler tartışılmakta, örgüt kuramının nesnesi olan örgütlere ilişkin ortak bir tanım aranmaktadır. Çalışma farklı perspektiflerin eksikliklerini ortaya koymakta ve örgüt kuramının her yönüyle tamamlanmış temeller üzerinde durmadığı sonucuna varılmaktadır. Çalışma örgüt kuramının farklı perspektiflere ihtiyaç duyduğu sonucunu da çıkarmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-orgut-kuraminin-temelleri.pdf
  • 1
111-129
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Astley, W. Graham ve Andrew H. Van de Ven. (1983), “Central Perspectives and
Debates in Organizational Theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly,
(28)2: 245-273.
2. Barnard, Chester I. (1938), Functions of Executives, Cambridge: Harvard University
Press.
3. Blau, Peter M. (1955), The Dynamics of Bureaucracy, Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
4. Blau, Peter M. ve W. Richard Scott. (1962), Formal Organizations, San Francisco:
Chandler.
5. Braverman, Harry. (1974), Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of
Work in the Twentieth Century, New York: Monthly Review Press
Cyert, Richard M. ve James G. March. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm,
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
6. Davis, Kingsley. (1949), Human Society, New York: Macmillan
DiMaggio, Paul J. ve Walter W. Powell. (1983), “The Iron Cage Revisited:
Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”,
American Sociological Review, Vo.: 48, No: 2, s.147-160.
7. Edwards, Richard. (1979), Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the
Workplace in the Twentieth Century, New York: Basic Books.
8. Etzioni, Amitai. (1964), Modern Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-
Hall.
9. Fayol, Henri. (1949), General and Industrial Management, London: Pitman
Publishing Company.
10. Gans, John M. (1936), “A Theory of Organization in Public Administration”, The
Frontiers of Public Administration, (Editors: J. Gans, L.D. White, W.
Dimock) Chicago: University of Chicago Press, s.66
11. Gouldner, Alvin W. (1959), “Organizational Analysis”, Sociology Today, (Editors:
Robert K. Merton, Leonard Broom ve Leonard S. Cottrell, Jr.), New York:
Basic Books, s. 400-428.
12. Gulick, Luther ve L. Urwick. (1937), Papers on the Science of Administration, New
York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University.
13. Hannan, Michael T. ve John H. Freeman. (1977), “The Population Ecology of
Organizations” American Journal of Sociology, Vo.: 82, No: 5, s. 929-964
14. Katz, Daniel ve Robert L. Khan. (1952), “Some Recent Findings in Human Relations
Research in Industry”, Readings in Social Psychology (2nd Ed.) (Editors: Gay
E. Swanson, Theodor M. Newcomb ve Eugene L. Hartley), New York: Holt,
s.650-665.
15. Leavitt, Harold J. (1965), “Applied Organizational Change in Industry: Structural,
Technological and Humanistic Approaches”, Handbook of Organizations,
(Editor: James G. March), Chicago: Rand McNally s.1144-1170.
16. Lipset, S. Martin, Martin A. Trow ve James S. Colman. (1956), Union Democracy,
Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press
March, James G. ve Herbert A. Simon. (1958), Organizations, New York: John
Wiley.
17. Mayo, Elton. (1945), The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilization, Boston:
Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
18. Merton, Robert K., Ailsa P. Gray, Barbara Hockey ve Hanan C. Selvin, (1952),
Reader in Bureaucracy, Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press
Meyer, John W. ve Brain Rowan. (1977), “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal
Structure as Myth and Ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, Vo.: 83,
No: 2, s.340-363.
19. Mintzberg, Henry. (1979), The Structure of Organizations, Englewood Cliff’s, N.J.:
Prentice-Hall.
20. Pfeffer, Jeffrey ve Gerald R. Salanzic. (1978), The External Control of
Organizations, New York: Harper & Row, Pub.
21. Porter, Lyman W., Edward E. Lawler, III ve J. Richard Hackman. (1975), Behavior in
Organizations, New York: McGraw Hill.
22. Scott, W. Richard. (1992), Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems
(3rd Ed.) New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
23. Selznick, Philip. (1948), “Foundations of the Theory of Organization”, American
Sociological Review, Vo.:13, No: 1, s. 25-35.
24. Selznick, Philip. (1949), TVA and the Grass Roots, Berkeley: University of
California Press
25. Simon, Herbert A. (1965), Administrative Behavior, (2nd Ed.) New York: Free Press.
Thompson, James D. (1956), “On Building an Administrative Science”,
Administrative Science Quarterly, Vo.:1, No: 1, s.102-111.
26. Üstüner, Yılmaz (2006) “Örgüt Bilimi Üzerine”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt 30, Sayı
3: s. 1-21.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com