You are here

Home » Content

İşitme Engelli Yetişkinlerin Türkçe Biçimbilimi Farkındalığı

Turkish Morphology Awareness of Deaf Adults

Journal Name:

  • Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The poor performance of literacy skills of deaf adults compared to their age group and the difficulties they experience in understanding what they read draw attention to their awareness of spoken language. This study examines Turkish morphology awareness of primary and high school graduated deaf adults and factors which might be effective on morphology awareness. Grammaticality Judgement Test being developed by this researcher was applied to deaf adults participants via SuperLab 4.0 program and their answers and answering time was examined. 30 deaf participants consisting from primary school graduated (15) and high school graduated (15) took part in the study. According to the findings of the research, both primary and high school graduated deaf adults have more false answers and their answering times are longer compared to their hearing age group. Furthermore, both primary and high school graduated deaf adults have same false rates without noticing educational background. Findings of this research show that Turkish morphology awareness of the deaf adults were insufficient to some extend.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
İşitme engelli yetişkinlerin okuma ve yazma becerilerinin işiten akranlarından geri olması ve okuduğunu anlama sürecinde karşılaştıkları güçlükler dikkatleri konuşma dili farkındalık düzeylerine çekmektedir. Bu çalışmada, ilkokul (5 yıl) ve lise mezunu işitme engelli yetişkin bireylerin Türkçe biçimbilimsel farkındalık düzeyi ile bu düzey üzerinde etkisi olabileceği düşünülen nedenler araştırılmıştır. Araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilen Dilbilgisi Yargı Testi, SuperLab 4.0 programı ile katılımcılara uygulan mış ve doğru/yanlış oranı ile cevaplama süreleri incelenmiştir. Çalışmaya ilkokul mezunu 15 ve lise mezunu 15 olmak üzere toplam 30 işitme engelli birey katılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, hem ilkokul hem de lise mezunu işitme engelli bireylerin işiten akranlarından daha fazla yanlış yaptığı, cevaplama hızları açısından bakıldığında ise işitme engelli bireylerin daha uzun sürede cevapladıkları görülmüştür. Bununla birlikte, öğrenim düzeyi fark etmeksizin hem ilkokul hem de lise mezunu işitme engelli yetişkin bireylerin benzer oranda yanlış yaptıkları saptanmıştır. Araştırmanın bulguları, işitme engelli yetişkinlerin Türkçe biçimbilimi farkındalığında, zayıf yönleri olduğunu göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-isitme-engelli-yetiskinlerin-turkce-bicimbilimi-farkindaligi.pdf
  • 3
53-63
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Breadmore, H. L. (2007). Inflectional morphology in the literacy of deaf children. Unpublished PhD Thesis.
The University of Birmingham.
Bryant, P. & Nunes, T. (2006). Morphemes and literacy: a starting point. In Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Pretzlik, U. &
Hurry, J. (Eds.), Improving literacy by teaching morphemes (pp. 3-35). Routledge: Taylor and Francis
Group, London and Newyork.
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. B. Feldman, (Eds.),
Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hilsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on
reading. Reading and writing, 12, 169-190.
Deacon, S. H. & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just "more phonological?" the roles of
morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied psycholinguistics, 25,
223-238.
Deacon, S. H. & Bryant, P. (2006). This turnip's not for turning: children's morphological awareness and their
use of root morphemes in spelling. British journal of developmental psychology, 24, 567-575.
Fabbretti, D., Volterra, V. & Pontecorvo, C. (1998). Written language abilities in deaf Italians. Journal of Deaf
Studies and Deaf Education, 3, 231-244.
Fowler, A. E. & Liberman, I. Y. (1995). The Role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In
B. Feldman, (Eds.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gaustad, M. G. (2000). Morphological analysis as a word identification strategy for deaf readers. Journal of deaf
studies and deaf education, 5, 60-80.
Gaustad, M. G., Kelly, R. R., Payne, J. A. & Lylak, E. (2002). Deaf and hearing students' morphological
knowledge applied to printed English. American annuals of the deaf, 147, 5-21.
Gaustad, M. G. & Kelly, R. R. (2004). The Relationship between reading achievement and morphological word
analysis in deaf and hearing students matched for reading level. journal of deaf studies and deaf
education, 9, 269-285.
Makaroğlu, B. (2012). İşitme engelli yetişkinlerin Türkçe biçimbilimi farkındalığı. Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(3), 53-63.
63
Kelly, R. R. & Gaustad, M. G. (2007). Deaf college students' mathematical skills relative to morphological
knowledge, reading level, and language proficiency. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 12,
25-37.
Mahony, D., Singson, M. & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations.
Reading and writing, 12, 191-218.
Maria, S., Mahony, D. & Mann, V. (2000). The Relation between reading and morphological skills: Evidence
from derivational suffixes. Reading and writing, 12, 219-252.
Mussellam, C. (2000). How do children who can’t hear learn to read an alphabetic script? a review of the
literature on reading and deafness. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 5 (1), 9-30.
Quigley, S. P. & King, C. M. (1980). Syntactic performance of hearing ımpaired and normal hearing individuals.
Applied psycholinguistics, 1, 329-356.
Robbins, N.L. & Hatcher, C. W. (1981). The Effect of syntax on the reading comprehension of hearing-impaired
children. Volta review, 83, 105-115.
Volterra, V. & Bates, E. (1989). Selective impairment of Italian grammatical morphology in congenitally deaf: a
case study. Cognitive neuropsychology, 6, 273-308.
Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Snyder, L. S. & Mayberry, R. I. (1996). How deaf and normally hearing students convey
meaning within and between written sentences. Volta review, 98, 9-38.
Waters, G. S. & Doehring, D. G. (1990). Reading acquisition in congenitally deaf children who communicate
orally: insights from an analysis of component reading, language, and memory skills. In T. Carr & B.
Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development. New York: Academic Press

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com