You are here

GEÇMİŞİN ZAMAN VE KENDİLİK ALGISI ÜZERİNDEKİ BİÇİMLENDİRİCİ ETKİSİ

THE FORMATIVE EFFECT OF PAST ON THE PERCEPTION OF TIME AND SELFHOOD

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Psikanalitik alanda hangi ekol dikkate alınırsa alınsın zaman ve kendilik arasındaki ilişki her zaman temel sorunsallardan biri olmuştur. Zaman algısının bireyin geçmişini, bugününü ve dolayısıyla geleceğini belirlemesi, zaman olgusunun kendilik üzerindeki biçimlendirici etkisini arttırmaktadır. Psikanalitik alanda son derece dikkat çeken bu sorunsalın yazınsal yapıtlarda yansımalarını görmek ise kaçınılmaz olmuş ve pek çok yazar bireyin kendilik ve zaman algısı arasındaki çatışma üzerinde odaklanmıştır. Bu çalışmada, Amerikan oyun yazarı Eugene O’Neill’in Mourning Becomes Electra üçlemesinde zamanın bireylerin bugününü ve geleceklerini biçimlendirici etkisi nesne ilişkileri ekolü çerçevesinde tartışılmakta; zaman ve nesne algısının kişilik oluşumundaki en önemli unsurlar olduğu ileri sürülmektedir.
Abstract (Original Language): 
No matter which school is taken into consideration, the relation between time and selfhood has always been one of the major problematic issues in the psychoanalytic field. That the perception of time shapes the individual’s present and, therefore, future increases the formative effect of time on selfhood. It has become inevitable to see the reflections of this problematic taking considerable attention in the psychoanalytic field on literary works and many authors have focused on the conflict between self and time. In this study, the formative effect of time on the present and future of the individuals is discussed within the perspective of object relations school by focusing on Eugene O’Neill’s trilogy, Mourning Becomes Electra, and it is argued that the perception of time and objects is the most significant factors in the formation of self.
1
11

REFERENCES

References: 

Alexander, D. M. (1953). Psychological Fate in Mourning Becomes Electra. PMLA. 68(5). 923-934
Alfrod, C. F. (1993). Greek Tragedy, Confusion, and Melanie Klein: or, Is There an Oresteia Complex?
American Imago. 50(1). 1-27.
Clark, B. H. (Ed.). (1947). European Theories of the Drama: With a Supplement on the American Drama. New
York: Crown Publishers.
Gatta Jr., J. (1979). American Subject: Moral History as Tragedy in the Plays of Eugene O’Neill. 6(2). 227-239.
Jacobs, Amber. (2007). The Potential Theory: Melanie Klein, Luce Irigaray, and the Mother-Daughter
Relationship. Hypatia. 22(3). 175-193.
Kavaler-Adler, S. (1993). The Conflict and Process Theory of Melanie Klein. American Journal of
Psychoanalysis. 53(3). 187-204.
Kenny, Robert Walde (2006). The Phenomenology of the disaster. Philosophy and Rhetoric. 39(2). 97-124.
Kernberg, Otto. (2004). Object-Relations Theory and Psychoanalysis. New York: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers.
Klein, M. (1928). Early Stages of the Oedipus Conflict. New York: The Free Press. 186-198.
---. (1937). Love, Guilt and Reparation. Love, Guilt and Reparation. New York: The Free Press. 306-343.
Manheim, Michael. (2000). O’Neill Faces His Ghosts. Resources for American Literary Study. 26(1). 90-95.
Moorton Jr., Richard F. (1989). The Author as Oedipus in Mourning Becomes Electra and Long Day’s Journey
into Night. Papers on Language and Literature. 25(3).304-325.
O’Neill, E. (1959). Three Plays: Desire Under the Elms; Strange Interlude; Mourning Becomes Electra. USA:
Vintage Books. (The trilogy “Mourning Becomes Electra” is dated 1931)
O’Neill, S.J, J. (1963). The Tragic Theory of Eugene O’Neill. Texas Studies in Literature and Language. 4(4).
481-496.
Perlow, Meir. (1995). Understanding Mental Objects. New York: Routledge.
Smith, Henry F. (2009). The Past is Present, isn’t it?. Leticia Glocer Fiorini and Jorge, Canestri (Eds). The
Experience of Time: Psychoanalytic Perspectives. (xv-xxii). London: Karnac Books.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com