You are here

Bilişim Teknolojileri Uygulamalarında Kullanım Niyetine Etki Eden Davranışsal Faktörleri Belirlemeye Yönelik Bütünleşik Bir Model Önerisi

An Integrative Model Proposition On Behavioural Factors Affecting Intention of Use In Information Technologies Implications

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
Information systems are established to increase firm performance however they have very high investment costs and they are also time taking projects. Unless appropriate components are supplied they may not achieve expected results and fail. One of the fundamental problems in the information systems practices is the fragility of the users in the acceptance of the system. Although Technology Acceptance Model is highly preferred model concerning the acceptance of information technologies as well as usage, researches prove that there is still a need for the improvement of the model. In this study technology readiness is their reintroduced usage to the model as an antecedent of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, whereas satisfaction is considered as a mediator between technology readiness and intention. This model is tested with Structural Equation Modeling.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bilişim sistemleri işletme performansını artırmaya yönelik olarak kurulan ancak aynı zamanda maliyetli ve zaman alıcı projelerdir. Bu projeler uygun bileşenler sağlanmadığında beklenilen yararlara ulaşamayarak başarısızlıkla sonuçlanabilmektedir. Bilişim teknolojisi uygulamalarında temel sorunlardan biri kullanıcıların sistemi kabulündeki zayıflıklarıdır. Teknoloji Kabul Modeli, bilişim teknolojilerinin kabulü ve kullanımı ile ilgili en çok benimsenen model olmakla birlikte, modele ilişkin yapılan araştırmalar modelin geliştirilme gereksinimini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bu çalışmada kurumsal kaynak planlama sistemlerinin kullanımında, algılanan kullanım kolaylığı ve yararının öncülü olarak teknolojiye hazırlık araştırma modeline dahil edilmiş, kullanım memnuniyeti ise kolaylık ve yarar algıları ile niyet arasında düzenleyici olarak ele alınmıştır. Çözümleme Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile test edilmiştir.

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Bandalos, D.L. (2002). The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit
and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling, Structural
Equation Modeling, 9(1):78-102.
Baron, R.M. ve Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable
Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and
Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
51(6):1173-1182.
Cattell, R.B. ve Bursdal, C.A. (1975). The Radial Parcel Double Factoring
Design: A Solution to the Item-vs-Parcel Controversy, Multivariate Behavioral,
10(2):165-179.
Cheng, E.W.L. (2001). SEM Being More Effective than Multiple
Regression in Parsimonious Model Testing for Management Development
Research, Journal of Management Development, 20(7):650-667.
Chou, S.W. ve Chang, Y.C. 2008. The implementation factors that
influence the ERP benefits, Decision Support Systems, 46(1):149-157.
Cronin, J.J., Brady, M.K. ve Hult, G.T.M. 2000. Assessing the effects of
quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in
service environments, Journal of Retailing, 76(2):193-218.
Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user
acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3):319-340.
Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. ve Warshaw, P.R. 1989. User acceptance of
computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management
Science, 35(8):982-1003.
Forslund, H. 2010. ERP Systems’ Capabilities for supply chain
performance management, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110
(3):351-367.
Fusilier ve Durlabhji, 2005. An exploration of student internet use in India:
the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior, Campus
Wide Information Systems, 22(4):233-246.
Hau, K. ve Marsh, H.W. (2004). The Use of Item Parcels in Structural
Equation Modeling: Non-normal Data and Small Sample Sizes, British Journal
of Mathematical Statistical Psychological Society, 57:327-351.
Özer-Eriş-Özmen/Bilişim Teknolojileri Uygulamalarında…
112
Hodgkinson, G.P. ve Sadler-Smith, E. (2003). Complex or Unitary? A
Critique and Empirical Re-assessment of the Allinson Hayes Cognitive Style
Index, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(2):243–
268.
Holt, J.K. (2004). Item Parceling in Structural Equation Models for
Optimum Solutions, Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research
Association, Oct 13-16, 2004. Colombus OH, Proceedings:2-7.
Judd, C.M., Kenny, D.A. ve McClelland, G.H. (2001). Estimating and
Testing Mediation in Within-Subject Designs, Psychological Methods,
6(2):115-134.
Kale, P.T, Banwait, S.S. ve Laroiya, S.C. 2010. Performance evaluation of
ERP implementation in India SMEs, Journal of Manufacturing Technology
Management, 21(6):758-780.
Kenny, D.A., Korchmaros, J.D. ve Bolger N. (2003). Lower Level
Mediation in Multilevel Models, Psychological Methods, 8(2):115-128.
Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation
Modeling. USA:The Guilford Press.
Lam, S.Y., Chiang, J. ve Parasuraman, A. 2008. The effects of the
dimensions of technology readiness on technology acceptance: an empirical
analyses, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(4):19-39.
Legris, P., Ingham, J. ve Collerette, P. 2003. Why people use information
technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model, Information
& Management, 40:191-204.
Lin, J.S.C. ve Hsieh, P.L. 2006. The role of technology readiness in
customers’ perception and adoption of self-service technologies, International
Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(5):497-517.
Lin, J.S.C. ve Hsieh, P.L. 2007. The influence of technology readiness on
satisfaction and behavioral intentions toward self-service technologies,
Computers in Human Behavior, 23:1597-1615.
Lin, C.H., Shih, H.Y ve Sher. P.J. 2007. Integrating Technology Readiness
into Technology acceptance: The TRAM Model, Psychology & Marketing,
24(7):641-657.
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi,
Cilt:27, Sayı:2, Yıl:2012, ss.93-114.
113
Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G. ve Widaman, K.F. (2002). To
Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Metris,
Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2):151-173.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K., Balla, J.R. ve Grayson, D. (1998). Is More Ever Too
Much? The Number of Indicators Per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis,
Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(2):181-220.
Moore, G.C. ve Benbasat, I. 1991. Development of an Instrument to
measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation,
Information Systems Research, 2(3):192-222.
Nicolaou, A. ve Bchattacharya, S. 2006. Organizational performance effects
of ERP systems usage: The impact of post implementation change, International
Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7:18-35.
Parasuraman, A. 2000. Technology readiness index (TRI) a multiple-item
scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies, Journal of Service
Research, 2(4):307-320.
Park, J.H, Suh, H.J. ve Yang, H.D. 2007. Perceived absorptive capacity of
individual users of performance of enterprise resource planning (ERP) usage:
The case for Korean Firms, Information & Management, 44(3):300-312.
Preacher, K.J. ve Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS Procedures for
Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models, Behavior Research
Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(4):717-731.
Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş Temel İlkeler ve
LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara:Ekinoks Yayınevi.
Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating
control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into technology acceptance model,
Information Systems Research, 11(4):342-365.
Venkatesh, V. ve Davis, F.D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the
technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Management
Science, 46(2):186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. ve Davis, F.D. 2003. User
acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly,
27(3):425-478.
Özer-Eriş-Özmen/Bilişim Teknolojileri Uygulamalarında…
114
Wang, E., Chou, H-W ve Jiang, J. 2005, The impacts of charismatic
leadership style on team cohesiveness and overall performance during ERP
implementation, International Journal of Project Management, 2:173-180.
Bandoyopadhyay, K. 2010. User acceptance of ERP systems in the United
States,http://www.swdsi.org/swdsi2010/SW2010_Preceedings/papers/PA139.pd
f, (Erişim: 03.01.2011)

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com