You are here

Home » Content

KOZMOPOLİTAN-TOPLULUKÇU AYRIMI: ÜÇÜNCÜ BİR YAKLAŞIM OLABİLİR Mİ?

COSMOPOLITAN-COMMUNITARIAN DICHOTOMY: TOWARDS A THIRD WAY?

Journal Name:

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplinindeki başlıca güncel çalışma alanlarından bir tanesi de farklı yaklaşımlar barındıran normatif kuramdır. İki tane başlıca yaklaşım vardır: 1980’lerdeki felsefi tartışmalara dayanan Kozmopolitan yaklaşım ve Toplulukçu yaklaşım. Üçüncü bir grup 1990’lı yılların başından beri bu ayrımı sorgulamaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı, Kozmopolitan-Toplulukçu ikilem hakkındaki son otuz yıldır devam etmekte olan kuramsal literatürü eleştirel olarak incelemektir. Bu makalede, zor olduğu kabul edilmekle birlikte üçüncü bir yaklaşımın olabileceği iddia edilmektedir. Özellikle Kozmopolitan yaklaşımdaki ahlaksal ve siyasal olmak üzere ikili ayrıma odaklanılarak, üçüncü bir yaklaşımın olabilirliği ve bununla beraber evrensel ahlak olasılığı araştırılmaktadır.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
One of the current challenging study areas in International Relations discipline is normative theory which involves variety of approaches. There are two main groups: cosmopolitan and communitarian based on the philosophical concerns of the 1980s. A third group began to question this dichotomy since the 1990s. The aim of this article is to present a critical review of the theoretical literature about cosmopolitan-communitarian dichotomy over the past three decades. It is argued that though it is difficult there can be a middle ground. By particularly focusing on two of the dominant articulations of cosmopolitanism, that are moral and political cosmopolitan approaches, this article attempts to analyze the possibilities and limitations inherent in the search for ethical universalism through a third way.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kozmopolitan-toplulukcu-ayrimi-ucuncu-bir-yaklasim-olabilir-mi.pdf
  • 2
21
48
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Beitz, C. R. (1975). Justice and International Relations. Philosophy and
Public Affairs, 4 (4), 360-389.
Beitz, C. R. (1979). Political Theory and International Relations.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beitz, C. R. (2000). Rawls’s Law of Peoples. Ethics, 110(4), 669-696.
Cosmopolitan-Communitarian Dichotomy: Towards A Third Way?
45
Beitz, C. R. (2005). Cosmopolitanism and Global Justice. The Journal of
Ethics, 9(1-2), 11-27.
Bray, D. (2009). Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism: A Deweyan Approach to
Democracy beyond the Nation-State. Millennium: Journal of
International Studies, 37(3), 683-719.
Bray, D. (2013). Pragmatic Ethics and the Will to Believe in
Cosmopolitanism. International Theory, 5(3), 446-476.
Brock, G. and Brighouse, H. (Eds.) (2005). The Political Philosophy of
Cosmopolitanism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Brown, C. (1992). International Relations Theory: New Normative
Approaches. London: Harvester.
Brown, C. (2001). Ethics, Interest and Foreign policy. K. E. Smith and M.
Light (Eds.), Ethics and Foreign Policy (pp. 15-32). Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
Brown, C. (2010a). Practical Judgement in International Political Theory.
New York: Routledge.
Brown, C. (2010b). International Political Theory Then and Now: The
Fate of the Ethical Middle Ground? Paper presented in ECPR –SGIR
7th Pan‐European IR Conference, Stockholm, September 9‐11.
Accessed March 2015, http://www.eisanet.
org/bebruga/eisa/files/events/stockholm/ECPR%20Middle%20
Ground%20Ethics.pdf
Buchanan, A. (2000). Rawls’s Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished
Westphalian World. Ethics, 110(4), 697-721.
Bulley, D. (2004). Foreign policy as Ethics: Toward a Re-Evaluation of
Values. Foreign Policy Analysis, 10(2), 165-180.
Caney, S. (2005). Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, X. (2012). Introduction: the boundary of our nation can only be
measured by the sun: cosmopolitanism and humanity. Journal of
East-West Thought, 4(2), 1-8.
Cochran, M. (1999). Normative Theory in International Relations: A
Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cochran, M. (2001). A Pragmatist Perspective on Ethical Foreign Policy.
K. E. Smith and M. Light (Eds.), Ethics and Foreign Policy (pp. 55-
74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cochran, M. (2009). Charting the Ethics of the English School: What
‘Good’ is there in a Middle-ground ethics? International Studies
Quarterly, 53(1), 203-225.
Nilüfer Karacasulu and İrem Aşkar Karakır
46
Donaldson, T. (2002). Kant’s Global Rationalism. T. Nardin and D. R.
Mapel (Eds.), Traditions of International Ethics (pp. 136-157).
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Dufek, P. (2013). Why strong moral cosmopolitanism requires a worldstate.
International Theory, 5(2), 177-212.
Ellis, A. (2002). Utilitarianism and International Ethics. T. Nardin and D.
R. Mapel (Eds.), Traditions of International Ethics (pp.158-179).
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Erskine, T. (2001). Assigning Responsibilities to Institutional Moral
Agents: The Case of States and Quasi-States. Ethics and
International Affairs, 15(2), 67-85.
Erskine, T. (2008). Locating Responsibility: The Problem of Moral Agency
in International Relations. C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (Eds.), The
Oxford Handbook of International Relations (pp. 699-707). Oxford,
Oxford University Press.
Fine, R. (2007). Cosmopolitanism. London and New York: Routledge.
Forde, S. (2002). Classical Realism. T. Nardin and D. R. Mapel (Eds.),
Traditions of International Ethics (pp. 62-84). Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press.
Frost, M. (1986). Towards a Normative Theory of International Relations.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frost, M. (1996). Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frost, M. (1998). A turn not taken: Ethics in IR at the Millennium. Review
of International Studies, 24(5), 119-132.
Frost, M. (2001). The Ethics of Humanitarian Intervention: Protecting
Civilians to
Make Democratic Citizenship Possible. K. E. Smith and M. Light (Eds.),
Ethics and Foreign Policy (pp. 33-54). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Frost, M. (2009a). Ethical Competence in International Relations. Ethics
and International Affairs, 23(2), 91-100.
Frost, M. (2009b). Global Ethics: Anarchy, Freedom and International
Relations. London and New York: Routledge.
Griffiths M. and O’Callaghan, T. (2002). International Relations: The Key
Concepts. London and New York: Routledge.
Hayden, P. (2009a). Cosmopolitan Past and Present. P. Hayden (Ed.),
The Ashgate Research Companion to Ethics and International
Relations (pp. 43-62). Surrey, Ashgate Publishing.
Hayden, P. (2009b). Ethics and International Relations. Surrey, Ashgate
Cosmopolitan-Communitarian Dichotomy: Towards A Third Way?
47
Publishing.
Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern
State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity.
Held, D. (2005). Principles of Cosmopolitan Order. G. Brock and H.
Brighouse (Eds.) The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (pp.
10-27) Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Hollis M. and Smith, S. (2003). Explaining and Understanding
International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hurrell, A. (2002). Norms and Ethics in International Relations. W.
Carlsnaes, B.A. Simmons and T. Risse (Eds.), Handbook of
International Relations (pp.147-154). London, Sage Publications.
Hutchings, K. (1999). International Political Theory: Re-thinking Ethics in
a Global Era. London: Sage Publications.
Kleingeld, P. and Brown, E. (2013). Cosmopolitanism. E. N. Zalta (Ed.)
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed June, 2014,
http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/cosmopolitanis
m/.
Linklater, A. (1981). Men and Citizens in International Relations. Review
of International Studies, 7(1), 23-37.
Linklater, A. (1995). Neo-realism in Theory and Practice. S. Smith and K.
Booth (Eds.) International Relations Theory Today (pp. 241-262).
Oxford, Blackwell Publishers.
Nagel, T. (2005). The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy & Public
Affairs, 33(2), 113-147.
Nardin, T. (2008). International Ethics. C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (Eds.),
The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (pp. 594-612).
New York, Oxford University Press.
Odysseos, L. (2002). Dangerous Ontologies: the Ethos of Survival and
Ethical
Theorizing in International Relations. Review of International Studies,
28(2), 403- 418.
Pierik, R. and Werner, W. (Eds.) (2010). Cosmopolitanism in Context:
Perspectives from International Law and Political Theory,
Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Pogge, T. W. (1992). Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty. Ethics, 103(1),
48-75.
Pogge, T. W. (1994). An Egalitarian Law of Peoples. Philosophy & Public
Affairs, 23(3), 195-224.
Pogge, T. (2012). Cosmopolitanism: a Path to Peace and Justice. Journal
of East-West Thought, 4(2), 9-32.
Nilüfer Karacasulu and İrem Aşkar Karakır
48
Rawls, J. (1993). The Law of Peoples. Critical Inquiry, 20(1), 36-68.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The
Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Reus-Smit, C. (2009). On IR Cultures, Re-thinking IR and Bridging the
Normative-Empirical Divide. Theory Talk, No. 27. Accessed,
August, 2014,http://www.theory-talks.org/2009/03/theory-talk-
27.html.
Shorten, A. (2007). Borders and Belonging: Recent Work in Cosmopolitan
Philosophy. European Journal of Political Theory, 6(2), 227-238.
Smith, S. (1992). The Forty Years’ Detour: The Resurgence of Normative
Theory in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of
International Studies, 21(3), 489-506.
Smith, M. J. (2002). Liberalism and International Reform. T. Nardin and
D. R. Mapel (Eds.), Traditions of International Ethics (pp. 201-
224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed August, 2014,
http://plato.standford.edu/entries/communitarianism.
Thompson, J. (2002). Justice and World Order: A Philosophical Inquiry.
London: Routledge.
Walker, R.B.J. (1993). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political
Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walzer, M. (1977). Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books.
Walzer, M. (1990). The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism. Political
Theory, 18(1), 11-12.
Weber, E. T. (2013). On Pragmatism and International Relations. S. J.
Ralston (Ed.), Philosophical Pragmatism and International
Relations (pp. 25-41). Lanham MD, Lexington Books.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com