You are here

Home » Content

ARDIŞIK KESİKLİ REAKTÖR İLE NUTRİENT GİDERİMİNDE FARKLI KARBON KAYNAKLARININ ETKİLERİ

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT CARBON SOURCES ON NUTRIENT REMOVAL BY USING SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Journal Name:

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Sequencing batch operation was used for nutrient (COD, NH4-N, NO3-N, and PO4-P) removal from synthetic wastewater by using different carbon sources. Operation consisted of anaerobic, anoxic, oxic, anoxic and oxic ( An/ Ax/ Ox/ Ax/ Ox) phases with durations of 2/ 1/ 4.5 / 1.5/ 1.5 hours. Glucose, acetate and a mixture of glucose/acetate were used as carbon source to yield COD/N/P ratio of 100/5/1.5 in the feed. Sludge age was kept constant at 10 days. COD, NH4-N, NO3-N and PO4-P removal efficiencies were maximum at the levels of 96%, 87%, 81% and 90 %, respectively when a mixture (50/50, in terms of COD) of glucose and acetate was used.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, ardışık kesikli işletme ile farklı karbon kaynakları kullanılarak sentetik atıksudan nutrient (KOİ, NH4-N, NO3-N, PO4-P) gideriminde karbon bileşiklerinin etkilerini incelemektir. Ardışık kesikli işletme anaerobik, anoksik, oksik, anoksik ve oksik olmak üzere beş basamaktan oluşmaktadır. Bu basamakların hidrolik alıkonma süreleri sırasıyla 2 / 1/ 4.5/ 1.5/ 1.5 saat olarak sabit tutulmuştur. Giriş atıksuyunda KOİ/N/P oranı 100 / 5/ 1.5 olup, karbon kaynağı olarak glikoz, sodyum asetat ve glikoz/sodyum asetat karışımı kullanılmıştır. Çamur yaşı 10 günde sabit tutulmuştur. Glikoz/sodyum asetat (KOİ olarak 50/50) karışımı kullanıldığında maksimum KOİ, NH4−N, NO3-N ve PO4-P giderme verimleri sırasıyla %96, %87, %81 ve %90 bulunmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 13-2.pdf
  • 1
9-16
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

APHA (1989): “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”, 17th edn.,
Washington, DC.
Andreottola G., Bortone G., Tilche A. (1997): “Experimental Validation of a Simulation and
Design Model for Nitrogen Removal in SBRs.” Wat. Sci. Tech., 35 (1), 113-120.
Arora M. L., Barth E.F, Umphres M. B. (1985): “Technology Evaluation of Sequencing Batch
Reactors”, J. Water Poll. Cont. Fed., 57(8), 867-875.
Carucci A., Majone M., Ramadori R., Rosetti S. (1997): “Biological Phosphorus Removal
with Different Organic Substrates in an Anaerobic/Aerobic Sequencing Batch Reactor”,
Wat. Sci. Tech., 35(1), 161-187.
Chang C. H., Hao O. J. (1996): “Sequencing Batch Reactor System for Nutrient Removal:
ORP and pH Profiles.”, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 67(1), 27-38.
Ho N. C., Ra K. M., Byung G. P., Seong-Jin L., Dong W. C., Woo G. L., Seok L. S., Yong H.
A. (2000): “Simulation of Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR) Operation for Simultaneous
Removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus”, Bioprocess Eng. 23, 513-521.
Metcalf Eddy (1991): “Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal, Reuse”, Third edition,
McGraw Hill, USA.
Sang-Ill L., Jong-Ho P., Kwang-Baik K., Ben K. (1997): “Effect of Fermented Swine Wastes
on Biological Nutrient Removal in SBRs”, Wat. Res., 31(7), 1807-1812.
Tasli R., Artan N., Orhon D. (1997): “The Influence of Different Substrates on Enhanced
Biological Phosphorus Removal in a SBR”, Wat. Sci. Tech., 35(1), 75-80.
Umble A. K., Ketchum, A. L. (1997): “A Strategy for Coupling Municipal Wastewater
Treatment using the Sequencing Batch Reactor with Effluent Nutrient Recovery through
Aquaculture”, Wat. Sci. Tech., 35(1), 177-184.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com