You are here

BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİSİ PROJELERİNDE REEL OPSİYONLAR

REAL OPTIONS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Many sources such as the immaturity, complexity and unpredictable evolution of the technologies themselves, and the difficulty of predicting the market demand generally cause uncertainty in the Information Technology (IT) projects. Managerial flexibility has value in the context of uncertain IT projects, as management can continuously gather information about uncertain project and market characteristics and, based on this information, change its course of action. As traditional capital budgeting (or project appraisal) approaches fail to consider embedded managerial flexibility in projects, the new investment evaluation approach called “real options” has come on the scene recently. “Options thinking,” an emerging investment management philosophy based on the theory of financial options can provide a promising foundation for hedging the risks under uncertainty. This paper aims at analyzing a real IT investment having growth opportunities by using real options approach. Specifically, the value of investing in a software project as well as embedded flexibility in this opportunity is modeled as an option contract. The expected costs required for completing the project and thereafter the resulting asset value are considered as the base-case parameters of this contract. Option values derived from Binomial method are used for evaluating the project and the optimal investment policy is determined based on these values. As a result, it is shown that the value of an IT project having flexibility can differ from one obtained with traditional capital budgeting methods and a rejected project which was seen as unprofitable before can turn a profitable one through embedded flexibilities
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çoğu zaman teknolojilerin olgunlaşmamış olması, karmaşıklığı, bu teknolojilerin kendilerinin tahmin edilemez gelişimi ve pazar talebini önceden tahmin etmenin zorluğu gibi nedenler Bilişim Teknolojisi (BT) projelerinde belirsizliğe neden olmaktadır. Belirsiz proje ve pazar karakteristikleri hakkında sürekli bilgi toplayabilen ve bu bilgiye dayalı olarak kararlarını ve aksiyonlarını revize edebilen bir yönetim söz konusu ise, yönetsel esneklik, belirsiz BT projeleri bağlamında bir değere sahiptir. Geleneksel sermaye bütçeleme (ya da proje değerleme) yöntemleri, projelerde gizli olan bu yönetsel esnekliği doğru değerleyemediğinden, son zamanlarda “reel opsiyonlar” olarak adlandırılan yeni bir değerleme yaklaşımı ortaya çıkmıştır. Finansal opsiyon teorisine dayanan bir yatırım yönetimi yaklaşımı olarak “opsiyonlarla düşünme”, projelerdeki belirsizlik durumlarında risklerden korunmayı sağlayabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, büyüme esnekliğine sahip gerçek bir BT yatırımını reel opsiyonlar yaklaşımı ile analiz etmektir. Spesifik olarak, bir yazılım projesine yatırım yapmanın ve bu fırsatın barındırdığı esnekliklerin değeri, bir opsiyon sözleşmesi olarak modellenmiştir. Bu sözleşmede, temel alınan durum değişkenleri olarak, projenin tamamlanması ile elde edilen varlığın değeri ve projeyi tamamlamanın beklenen maliyeti söz konusudur. Binom yaklaşımına dayalı olarak elde edilen opsiyon değerleri, projenin değerlendirilmesinde dikkate alınmış ve bu değerlere bağlı olarak optimal yatırım politikası belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, bir BT projesinin barındırdığı esnekliklere bağlı olarak değerinin, geleneksel sermaye bütçeleme yöntemleri ile elde edilen değerden daha farklı olabileceği ve kazançsız görülüp reddedilen bir projenin bu esnekliklerle daha karlı bir projeye dönüşebileceği gösterilmiştir.
17-51

REFERENCES

References: 

Adner, R. ve Levinthal, D.A. (2004). What is Not a Real Option:
Considering Boundaries for the Application of Real Options to Business Strategy.
Academy of Management Review, 29 (1): 74-85.
Akın, A. (2006), Opsiyon Teorisi Kullanılarak Yatırım Projelerinin
Değerlendirilmesi: Reel Opsiyonlar Yaklaşımı, Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi,
Vol. 8, No. 31, ss. 1-14.
Amram, M. ve Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real Options: Managing Strategic
Investment in an Uncertain World, Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
Bakos, J.Y. ve Kemerer, C.F. Recent applications of economic theory in
information technology research. Decision Support Systems, 8 (3) : 365-386.
Benaroch, M. ve Kaufmann, R. J. (1999). A Case for Using Real Options
Pricing Analysis to Evaluate Information Technology Project Investments.
Information Systems Research, 10 (1): 70-86.
Black, F., ve Scholes, M. (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate
Liabilities, Journal of Political Economy, 81(3): 637-654.
Bowman, E. H. ve Moskowitz, G. T. (2001). Real Options Analysis and
Strategic Decision Making, Organization Science, 12 (6) : 772-777.
Brach, M.A. (2003). Real Options in Practice. New Jersey: John Wiley &
Sons.
Brealey, R.A., Myers, S.C. ve Marcus, A.J. (2001), İşletme Finansının
Temelleri, 3. Baskı, İstanbul: McGraw-Hill – Literatür Yayıncılık.
Civelek, M. A. ve Durukan, M.B. (1998). Investments. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül
Yayınları.
Copeland, T. E. ve Keenan, P. T. (1998). How Much is Flexibility Worth?,
The McKinsey Quarterly, 2 : 38-49.
Copeland, T. and Antikarov, V. (2001) Real Options -- a practitioner's
guide, Texere, New York, NY.
Cox, J., Ross, S. ve Rubinsteinn, M. (1979). Option Pricing: A Simplified
Approach. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3) : 229-263.
Damodaran, A. (2003). The Premise of Real Options. The Revolution in
Corporate Finance (ss. 89-105). 4. Baskı. Derleyen Joel M. Stern ve Donald H.
Chew. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Dixit, A. K. ve Pindyck, R. S. (1994) Investment under Uncertainty,
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bilişim Teknolojisi Projelerinde Reel… DEÜ SBE Dergisi Cilt11, Sayı:4
49
Dixit, A. K. ve Pindyck, R. S. (2000). Expandability, Reversibility, and
Optimal Capacity Choice. Project Flexibility, Agency, and Competition: New
Developments in the Theory and Application of Real Options (ss.50-70). Derleyen
Michael J. Brennan ve Lenos Trigeorgis. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dogbe, G. K. (2006). Continuous-time Stochastic Process
Characterization and Valuation of Mineral Investments and Software Interface,
PhD Dissertation, Canada: University of Alberta.
Dos Santos, B.L. (1991), Justifiying Investments in New Information
Technologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7 (4):71-90.
Harmantzis, F. C.ve Tanguturi, V. P. (2007). Investment Decisions in the
Wireless Industry Applying Real Options. Telecommunications Policy, 31: 107–
123.
Howell, S., Stark, A., Newton, D., Paxson, D., Çavuş, M. ve Pereira, J.
(2001). Real Options: Evaluating Corporate Investment Opportunities in a
Dynamic World, GB: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Huchzermeier, A. ve Loch, C. (2001). Project Management Under Risk:
Using the Real Options Approach to Evaluate Flexibility in R&D. Management
Science, ABI/INFORM Global 47 (1): 85 – 101.
Hull, C. J. (2003). Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kaplan, R.S. (1986). Must CIM be justified by faith alone? Harward
Business Review, 64 (2) : 87-97.
Kenç, T. (2003). Reel Opsiyonlar Yöntemi ile Yatırım Projeleri
Değerlemesi, Active Bankacılık ve Finans Dergisi, 30: 79-83.
Kogut, B. ve Kulatilaka, N. (2001). Capabilities as Real Options,
Organization Science, 12(6): 744-758.
Kumar, R. L. (1996). A Note on Project Risk and Option Values of
Investments in Information Technologies. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 13 (1): 187-193.
Kumar, R.L. (2002), Managing Risks in IT Projects: An Options
Perspective, Information&Management, Vol.40, pp. 63-74.
Lander, D. M. ve Pinches, G. E. (1998). Challenges to the Practical
Implementation of Modeling and Valuing Real Options, The Quarterly Review of
Economics and Finance, 38 (Özel Sayı): 537-567.
Li, X. ve Johnson, J. D. (2002). Evaluate IT Investment Opportunities
Using Real Options Theory. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(3):
32-47.
Margrabe, W. (1978). The Value of an Option to Exchange One Asset for
Another. The Journal of Finance, 33 (1): 177-186.
İkiz, A.K., Kocakoç, İ.D., DEÜ SBE Dergisi Cilt11, Sayı:4
50
McDonald, R. ve Siegel, D. (1986). The Value of Waiting to Invest.
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101: 177–186.
McGrath, R.G. (1997). Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology
Positioning Investments. Academy of Management Review, 22: 974 -985.
Merrill, H.M. ve Wood, A.J. (1991). Risk and Uncertainty in Power
System Planning, Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 13 (2): 81-90.
Merton, R. (1973). The theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of
Economics and Management Science, 4 (1) : 141–183.
Merton , R.C. (1998). Applications of Option Pricing Theory: Twentyfive
Years Later. American Economic Review. 88: 323- 349.
Miller, L. T. ve Park, C. S. (2002). Decision Making Under Uncertainty –
Real Options to the Rescue?, The Engineering Economist, 47 (2): 105- 150.
Miller, L., Choi, S. H. ve Park, C. S. (2004). Using an Options Approach to
Evaluate Korean Information Technology Infrastructure. The Engineering
Economist, 49: 199–219.
Mun, J. (2002). Real Options Analysis: Tools and Techniques for Valuing
Strategic Investments and Decisions, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Munoz, C. (2006). A Real Option Strategic Scorecard Decision
Framework for IT Project Selectıon, Doktora Tezi, University of Central Florida.
Myers, S.C. (1977). Determinants of Corporate Borrowing, Journal of
Financial Economics, 5: 147–175.
Myers, S.C. (1987). Finance Theory and Financial Strategy, Midland
Corporate Finance Journal, 5: 6 - 13.
Powell, P. (1992). Information Technology Evaluation: Is It Different?
Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43 (1): 29-43.
Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R.W. ve Jordan, B. (2003). Fundamentals of
Corporate Finance, 6. Edition, New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin.
Ryan, S., Harrison, D. ve Schkade, L. (2002). Information Technology
Investment Decisions: When Do Costs and Benefits in the Social Subsystem
Matter. Journal of Management of Information Systems, 19 (2): 85-127.
Scheider, M., Tejeda, M., Dondi, G., Herzog, F., Keel, S. ve Geering, H.
(2008). Making Real Options Work for Practitioners: A Generic Model for Valuing
R&D Projects. R&D Management, 38 (1): 85-106.
Smit, H.T.J. ve Trigeorgis, L. (2006). Strategic Planning: Valuing and
Managing Portfolios of Real Options, R&D Management, 36(4): 403-419.
Soro, A. (2006). Evaluating IT investments within corporations – real
options Approach. Independent Research Project, http://www.sal.tkk.fi/
Opinnot/Mat-2.108/pdf-files/esor06.pdf (Erişim: 01.05.2009).
Bilişim Teknolojisi Projelerinde Reel… DEÜ SBE Dergisi Cilt11, Sayı:4
51
Sullivan, K., Chalasani, P., Jha, S. ve Sazawal, V., Software Design as an
Investment Activity:A Real Options Perspective, www.cs.virginia.edu/papers/
RiskBooksChapter.pdf, (Erişim: 01.05.2007).
Tong, W. T. ve Reuer, J. J. (2007). Real Options in Strategic Management.
Real Options Theory: Advances in Strategic Managament (ss. 3-28). Cilt 24.
Derleyen Jeffrey J. Reuer ve Tony W. Tong. Oxford: Elsevier JAI Press.
Triantis, A. J. ve Hodder, J. E. (1990). Valuing Flexibility as a Complex
Option, The Journal of Finance, 45 (2) : 549-565.
Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in
Resource Allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pre ss.
Trigeorgis, L. (2005). Making Use of Real Options Simple: An Overview
and Applications in Flexible/Modular Decision Making, The Engineering
Economist, 50: 25–53.
VOB (2004), Temel Düzeyde Türev Araçlar, Türev Araçlar Eğitim Seti,
Vadeli İşlemler Borsası Yayını, İzmir.
Wallace, L., Keil, M. (2004), Software Project Risks and Their Effect on
Outcomes, Communications of the ACM, Vol.47, No.4, pp.68-93.
Wang, T. ve Neufville, R. (2005), Real Options “in” Projects, 9th Real Options
Annual International Conference in Paris, France.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com