You are here

NTRODUCTORY COMMENTS “TRADE AND GLOBAL ECONOMY: EU AND TURKEY” “EUROPEANISATION AND THE ROLE OF ECONOMIC ELITES IN ROMANIA, HUNGARY AND TURKEY”

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This special issue of the journal is composed of the contributions from two conferences organized by the Department of European Studies, Graduate School of Social Sciences at Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir. The conferences were supported under the JM Chair in European Economic Integration (07/0013), and were concluded in cooperation with national NGOs. The conference titled “Trade and Global Economy: EU and Turkey” on 21 st April 2010 was in cooperation with Economic Development Foundation (IKV). Prof. Dr. Haluk Kabaalioğlu, President of Economic Development Foundation (IKV) and JM Chair in European Law at Yeditepe University, Prof. Dr. Michael Smith from Loughborough University, UK, Dr. M. Sait Akman from Marmara University and Turkish Economic Policy Research Foundation (TEPAV), and Mr. Şahin Yaman, Deputy Director General for Economic Research and Evaluation, Undersecreteriat of Foreign Trade of Turkey were the contributors of this conference. Dr.Nevzat Şimsek, Dr.Dilek Seymen and Prof.Dr. Utku Utkulu were the main contributors from the Department of Economics at Dokuz Eylul University. The discussion centred on the role of EU as a global actor, European trade strategy and its impact on Turkish trade policy under the framework of the Customs Union and the assessment of Turkey’s Competitiveness in the EU market and the Turkish and EU negotiation positions in the Doha Round. The conference on “Europeanisation and the Role of Economic Elites in Romania, Hungary and Turkey” which took place on 27 th April 2010 was in cooperation with Aegean Young Businessmen Association (EGIAD). Prof. Dr. Nicolae Paun from Babes-Bolyai University and Prof. Dr. Tibor Palankai from Corvinus University of Budapest, both Jean Monnet professors, contributed to the conference by sharing the experience of the transition periods of the two EU members, which were previously under the communist regime. This special issue includes seven papers. The first five papers mainly discuss the global trade agenda, the transformation of European trade policy from multilateralism to bilateralism and its impact on Turkey’s trade policy under the obligations of the Customs Union. The next two papers cover issues related to Europeanisation and the role of elites in the process, with specific case studies of Hungary and Romania. Each paper provides significant insight and suggestions for academics, researchers and policymakers.
7-16

REFERENCES

References: 

Balkır, C. and Soyaltın, D. (2009) The Limits to Europeanisation:
Analyzing Domestic Change in Turkey presented at the Workshop Organized by
Marmara University, Re-Conceptualizing Turkey-EU Relations, and Istanbul 9-10
October.
Bellmann, C., Biswas, T. and Chamay M. (2010) Recent Trends in World
Trade and International Negotiations, Revue Internationale de politique de
développement [Online], Vol.1: 161-187, http://poldev.revues.org/143
(05.07.2010)
Commission of the EC (2009) Commission Staff Working Document
Turkey 2009 Progress Report, 14 Oct. 2009, COM (2009) 533, SEC (2009)1334/3,
Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2009/tr_rapport_
2009_en.pdf (06.03.2010)
Commission of the EC (2006) Global Europe Competing in the World: A
Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Security, by E. Commission External
Trade, COM (2006) 567, Brussels, http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/
site/en/com/2006/com2006_0567en01.pdf (04.09.2010)
ECIPE (2009), Book presentation by Razeen Sally “Trade Policy, New
Century: The WTO, FTAs and Asia Rising”, http://www.ecipe.org/people/razeen-sally/speechesandpresentations/Trade%...
%20WTO,%20FTAs%20and%20Asia%20Rising%20By%20Razeen%20Sally.pdf
(04.09.2010)
ECIPE (2010), A Modern Trade Policy for then EU: A Report to the New
European Commission and Parliament from the EU Trade Policy Study Group.
ECIPE Publication, http://www.ecipe.org/tpsg/A%20Modern%20Trade%20
Policy%20 for%20The%20European%20Union.pdf (04.07.2010)
European Commission (2010) Europe 2020 A strategy for smart,
sustainable and inclusive growth COM (2010) 2020, Brussels,
http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%2000
7%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf (04.07.2010)
Grossman, E. (2004) Bringing politics back in: rethinking the role of
economic interest groups in European integration, Journal of European Public
Policy 11:4 August: 637–654.
Moravcsik, A. (1993) Preferences and power in the European Community:
a Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies,
31(4): 473–524.
Moravcsik, A. (1998) The choice for Europe. Social purpose and state
power from Messina to Maastricht, Itaca: Cornell University Press.
Balkır, C.
Radaelli, C. “Whither Europeanisation? Concept Stretching and
Substantive Change”, European Integration Online Papers, 4(8), http://eiop.or.at/
eiop/texte/2000-008a.htm (06.04.2010)
Woolcock, S. ed (2006), Trade and investment rule-making: the role of
regional and bilateral agreements. Tokyo: UN University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com