You are here

Türkiye’de Perakende Sektöründe Analitik Hiyerarşik Süreç Yaklaşımıyla Tedarikçi Performans Değerlendirmesi

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In increasing competitive conditions, supplier evaluation and selection methodologies which constitute most important part of the supply chain of the corporations gained big importance. While solving supplier selection problem which is multi objective by its nature, methodologies which allow “multi-criteria” evaluation are powerful. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) which is developed by Saaty(1980), proposes an efficient, systematic and simply applicable solution methodology. In this study, the performance evaluation and selection methodology of a nation-wide retail company are designed with AHP. First of all, retail specific performancecriteria and the importance of these criteria are determined. AHP methodology applied with these criteria and supplier evalutaion and rating are made. After rating, optimum criteria which are suitable for supplier evaluation and assesment table for suppliers discussed are provided given.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Artan rekabet koşullarında, işletmelerin tedarik zincirlerinin en önemli halkalarından biri olan tedarikçilerini değerlendirme ve seçme yöntemleri büyük önem kazanmıştır. Doğası gereği “çok amaçlı” bir karar verme problemi olan tedarikçi seçiminde çözüme giderken, “çoklu kritere” göre değerlendirme yapabilen yöntemler öne çıkmaktadır. Saaty (1980) tarafından geliştirilen Analitik Hiyerarşik Süreç (AHS), sistematik ve kolay uygulanabilir yapısıyla bu problem için etkinbir çözüm yöntemi önermektedir. Bu çalışmada, ulusal bir perakende zincirinin tedarikçi performans değerlendirme ve seçim sistemi AHS yöntemiyle tasarlanmıştır. Đlk olarak firma yöneticileriyle, perakende sektörüne özgü performans kriterleri ve bu kriterlerin önem dereceleri belirlenmiştir. Belirlenen kriterlere, AHS yöntemi uygulanaraktedarikçi değerlendirme ve puanlaması yapılmıştır. Yapılan puanlamalar sonucunda tedarikçi değerlendirmede kullanılabilecek optimum kriterler ve ele alınan tedarikçilere ilişkin değerlendirme tablosu ortaya konmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
1-17

REFERENCES

References: 

Banker, R. D. ve Khosla I. S., (1995), “Economics of Operations Management: A
Research Perspective.”, Journal of Operations Management, (12), 423-425.
Burt, D. N., (1984), “Proactive Procurement.”, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Chan F. T. S. ve Chan H. K., (2004), “Development of the supplier selection model- a
case study in advanced technology industry.”, Proc.Instn. Mech. Engrs., (218 ), Kısım
B, 1807-1824
16
Dağdeviren, M., Dönmez, N., Kurt, M.,(2006), “Bir Đşletme Đçin Tedarikçi
Değerlendirme Süreci Đçin Yeni Bir Model Tasarımı ve Uygulanması”, Gazi Üniv.
Müh. Mim. Fak. Der., Cilt 21, No:2, 247-255
Dağdeviren, M., Eren, T., (2001), “Tedarikçi Firma Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi
Prosesi ve 0-1 Hedef Programlama Yötenmlerinin Kullanılması”, Gazi Üniv. Müh.
Mim. Fak. Der., (16), 2, 41-52
Dickson. G., (1966), “An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decisions.”,
Journal of Purchasing, (2), 28-41
Forman, E.H., Gass, S.I., (2001), “The Analytic Hierarcy Process: An Exposition”,
Operations Research, (49), 4, 469-486
Gregory, R.E., (1968), “Source selection: A matric aproach”, Journal of Purchasing
and Materials Management, Yaz, 24-29
Humphreys, P., Huang, G., Cadden T., (2005), “A web-based supplier evaluation tool
for product development process”, Industrial Managment & Data Systems, (105), 2,
147-163
Liu, J, Ding F. Y., Lall V., (2000), “Supply Chain Management An International
Journal”, (5), 3, 143-150
Kannan, R. V., Tan C. K.,(2002), “The Journal of Supply Chain Managment: A
Global Review of Purchasing and Supply”, November
Mandal, A., Deshmukh, S.G., (1993), “Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural
Modelling (ISM)”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, (14),
6, 52-59
Narashiman, R., 1983, “An analytical aproach to supplier seleciton”, Journal of
Purchasing and Material Management, 27-32
Narashiman, R., & Talluri, S., & Mendez, D. (2001). Supplier evaluation and
rationalization via data envelopment analysis: an emprical examination. Journal of
Supply Chain Managment, 37, no3.
Paksoy, T., GüleşK. H.,2006, “Analytic Hierarchy Process For Supplier Selection
Problem In Supply Chain Management: Case Study Of ATextile Manufacturer Fırm,
Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 2006/4
Ronen, B., Trietsch, D., (1988), “A decision support system for purchasing
Management of large projects”, Operations Research,(36), 6,882-890
Saaty, T. L., (1980), “The Analytic Hierarcy Process.” , McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty, T.L., (1994), “Funamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory”, RWS,
Pittsburgh, 95
Sarıçiçek., Đ., Dağdeviren, M., Yüzügüllü, N., (2001), “Bir Đşletmede Tedarikçi
Seçimine Yönelik Bir Model Uygulanması”, Osmangazi Üniversitesi Müh. Mim Fak
Derg. C.xıv, s.1, 2001
Talluri, S., & Narasimhan, R., & , Nair, A. (2005). Vendor Performance with Supply
Risk: A chance-constrained DEA Approach. International Journal of Production, 100,
212-222.
Timmerman, E., 1986, “An approach to vendor performance evaluation”, Journal of
Purchasing and Materials Management,Kış, 2-8
Tully, S., (1995), “Purchasing’s New Muscle.”, Fortune, (20), 76
Wagner J., Ettenson R., Parrish J., (1989), “Vendor Selection Among Retail Buyers:
An Analysis by Merchandise Division.”, Journal Of Retailing, (65), 1, 58-79
17
Weber, C. A., (1996), “Data Envelopment Analysis Approach To Measuring Vendor
Performance.”, Supply Chain Management, (1), 1, 28-39
Weber, C. A., Current J. R., 1993, “A multi-objective aproach to vendor selection”,
European Journal of Operational Research, (68), 173-184
Weber, C. A., Current J. R., Benton W. C., “Vendor selection criteria and methods”,
European Journal of Operational Research, (50), North-Holland , 2-18
Wind, Y., Robinson P.J., (1968), “The determinants of vendor selection: The
evaluation function aproach”, Journal of Purchasingand Materials Management,
Ağustos, 29-41
Yahya, S., & Kingsman, S. (1999). Vendor Rating for an Enterpreneur Development
Programme: A Case Study Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method. The Journal
of Operational Research Society, Vol 50, No 9. 916-930.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com