You are here

Home » Content

Türk Deniz Ticaret Filosunda Yabancı Bayrağa Kaçışın Temel Nedenleri

Basic Motives For Escapes From Turkish Merchant Fleet to Foreign Flags

Journal Name:

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
It is observed that most of the ships owned by Turkish shipping companies have escaped from Turkish merchant fleet to foreign flags. Such escapes seem to have increased even more particularly in the recentdecade. In order to prevent the escapes, the Turkish International Ship Registry (TISR) was established in 1999, but even so the wants to escape kept going on. An overall picture of Turkish merchant fleet taken in 2007 reveals that most of the fleet have been flying foreign flags or registered with the TISR, and also that most of those in Turkish National Registry have been operated on thecabotage lines. The purpose of this research is to examine the actual reasons that force the Turkish shipowners to prefer foreign flags. To reach this aim, a questionnaire is conducted through the leading Turkish shipowners. The results of the questionnaire reveal that the very first and predominant motive attracting the shipowners is the easiness and the second one is certain financial facilities provided by foreign flags. The results of the relevant literature review also reveal that the basic factors that cause the ownersin many other countries to prefer foreign flags are similar to those attracting the Turkish shipowners to foreign flags.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Özellikle son on yılda sahibi Türk olan gemilerin yabancı bayrak altında çalıştırılmaları giderek artmıştır. 1999 yılında Türk Uluslararası Gemi Sicili’nin oluşturulması bu kaçışı durduramamıştır. 2007 yılı başlarında Türk Deniz Ticaret Filosu’nun durumuna bakıldığında gemilerin büyük bir kısmının yabancı bayrak altında çalıştırıldıkları veya Türk uluslararası gemi siciline kayıtlı oldukları görülmektedir. Türk ulusal siciline kayıtlı gemilerin büyük çoğunluğu kabotaj hattında çalışmaktadır. Araştırmanın amacı Türk armatörlerinin yabancı bayrağa kaçışnedenlerini sorgulamaktır. Bu amaçla yabancı bayrak altında gemi çalıştıran belli başlı armatörlere yönelik anket çalışması gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma sonunda Türk armatörlerinin yabancı bayrak altında gemi çalıştırmalarının birinci nedeninin yabancı bayrağın sağladığı kolaylıklar, ikinci nedeninin ise yabancı bayrağın sağladığı finansal avantajlar olduğu görülmüştür. Literatür taraması sonucunda elde edilen bulgular da diğer ülke armatörlerinin yabancı bayrak tercih nedenleriyle, Türk armatörlerinin yabancı bayrak tercih nedenleri arasında paralelik olduğunu göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_591_9_pp_40-61.pdf
  • 2
40-61
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Francisco, J. M. 2003, Open registers: past, present and future. Marine
Policy, 27,513-523.
2. Alderton,T. Winchester, N., 2002, Globalisation and de-regulation in
the maritime industry. Marine Policy, 26, 35-43.
3. Desombre, E.R. 2003, Globalization and environmental protection on the
high seas, Prepared for delivery at the 2003 annual meeting ofthe
American political science association, Philadelphia, USA, August,
pp.5-6,http://www.ceu.hu/polsci/Illicit_Trade-CEU/Week5-
DeSombre.doc, 26.12.2006.
4. International Transport Woorker’s Federation,
http://www.itfglobal.org/flags-convenience/sub-page.cfm, 02.01.2007.
5. United Nations Information Centre, 2001, Ankara,p.30.
6. Stopford, M.2002, Maritime Economics, London, U.K, Taylor and
Francis Group), p.436.
7. Ibid. [3]. pp.22-23.
60
8. International Transport Woorker’s Federation,
http://www.itfglobal.org/flags-convenience/flags-convenien-183.cfm,
02.01.2007.
9. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of
Maritime Transport, 2006, pp.34-36.
10. Danish Shipowners’ Association, 2006, Danish Shipping Figures.pp.6-7,
http://www.danmarksrederiforening.com/pdf/nov_2006_UK.pdf,
15.02.2007.
11. Institude of Shipping Economics and Logistic, 2006, Ownership pattern
of the world Merchant fleet,p.7.
http://www.isl.org/products_services/publications/pdf/COMM_4-2006-short.pdf, 10.02.2007.
12. Paris Port State Control Organisation, black-grey-white List, updated
October 2006,
http://www.parismou.org/upload/anrep/BlackGreyWhitelist%202005%20
.pdf, 30.01.2007.
13. Ibid[9]
14. ICS/ISF, 2006, Annual Review 2006, London, pp.21-22.
15. Official Journal C 013, 17/01/2004, Commission communication
C(2004) 43 — Community guidelines on State aid to maritime transport,
pp.3-12.
16. Kumar.S, Hoffmann.J, 2002, Globalisation: The Maritime Nexus, The
handbook of Maritime Economics and Business, London, MPG Books
Ltd.pp.51-52.
17. K.S. Gunnar, 2002, The Rise and Fall of National Shipping Policies, The
handbook of Maritime Economics and Business, London, MPG Books
Ltd.pp.485-487.
18. Ibit[16], pp.487-488.
19. Turkish Grand National Assembly, 2003, Notice of meeting, 22. term, 1.
year, 91. session.
http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/tutanak_b_sd.birlesim_baslangic_y
azici?P4=9745&P5=B&page1=33&page2=33, 15.01.2007.
20. Ibit, [10].
21. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of
Maritime Transport, 1997- 2006.
22. Turkish Chamber of Shipping, 1990, Ship Bulding Sector Report, II.
National Maritime Congress. Đstanbul, p.222.
23. Republic of Turkey Official Gazette, 1982, Act on improving Turkish
merchant fleet and promoting shipyards,no 17581.
24. Turkish Chamber of Shipping, 1992, Sector Report 1991, p.144.
25. Republic of Turkey Official Gazette, 2006, Decision on state subsidies
for investments, no 26311.
61
26. Republic of Turkey Official Gazette, 1999, The act on the Turkish
International Ship Registry, no 29913.
27. Republic of Turkey Official Gazette, 2006, Corporate income tax act, no
25205.
28. Ibid[6], p.175.
29. Ibid [12].
30. Deloitte, 2006, New corporate income tax act and its contributions, p.12.
http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/article/0,1002,sid%253D8403%2526cid%25
3D122284,00.html, 21.01.2007.
31. Republic of Turkey Official Gazette, 2004, Law on amending some of
the provisions of Turkish Commercial Code, no 25446.
32. Ibid[29].
33. Turkish Grand National Assembly, 2004, Notice of meeting,22.term, 3.
year, 33. meeting.
www.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanak/donem22/yil3/bas/b033m.htm, 15.01.2007.
34. Kinnear. C.T, Taylor.R.J, Marketing Research: An Applied Approach,
1996, 5th. Ed.USA, McGraw-Hill,Inc.pp.409-412.
35. Ibid[9]
36. Paris MOU,2006,Three-year detention rate per recognized
organization,
www.parismou.org/upload/anrep/RO%20performance%20list%202005a.
Pdf, 30.01.2007.
37. Ibid[6], p.160.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com