You are here

ANCIENT AND MODERN HYPOSTASES OF ELECTRA MYTH

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The present study proposes to investigate the system of the thematic elements of Electra myth from the diachronic perspective of its beginnings, development and consolidation. Under the form of literary myth, that is being an independent literary system expressing its own fundamental situation, Electra myth develops and establishes itself as literary typology and dramatic tradition in Electra by Sophocles, Electra by Euripides, Mourning Becomes Electra by O’Neill and Electra by Giraudoux; under the form of literalised myth, that is being placed as literary system within the larger system of a different and ampler fundamental situation expressed by the myth of the Atreus family (as an ethno-religious myth rendered literary in dramatic texts), Electra myth reveals itself in Oresteia by Aeschylus, The Flies by Sartre and The Family Reunion by Eliot, all these texts, of both types, representing the actual object of our research.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma Electra mitinin içerdiği tematik elemanlar sisteminin başlangıç, gelişim ve sonuç açısından artsüremli bir bakış açısından incelenmesini önermektedir. Kendi temel durumunu ifade eden bağımsız bir edebi sistem olan edebi mit formatında Electra miti, kendisini edebi bir tipoloji ve dramatik bir gelenek olarak Sophocles’in Electra, Euripides’in Electra, O’Neill’in Mourning Becomes Electra (Matem Elektra’ya Yakışır) ve Giraudoux’un Electra adlı eserlerinde geliştirir ve tesis eder. Edebileştirilmiş mit şeklinde, Atreus ailesi mitiyle (dramatik metinlerde edebi olarak sunulan dini-etnik bir mit) ifade edilen daha farklı ve daha geniş bir temel durum sistemi dahilindeki bir edebi sistem olarak, kendisini Aeschylus’un Oresteia, Sartre’ın The Flies ve Eliot’un The Family Reunion adlı her iki türe ait ve bu araştırmanın asıl hedefini teşkil eden eserlerinde gösterir.
41-53

REFERENCES

References: 

BARRANGER, M. S., Theatre. A Way of Seeing, Belmont, Wadsworth
Publishing Company, 1991;
BARRETT, W., Irrational Man. A Study in Existential Philosophy, Anchor
Books, New York, 1962;
BOURDIEU P., Regulile artei, Bucureşti, Univers, 1998;
CAUFMAN-BLUMENFELD O., Teatrul european – teatrul american:
influenţe, Iaşi, Editura Universităţii „Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, 1998;
CIORĂNESCU A., Principii de literatură comparată, Bucureşti, Cartea
Românească, 1997;
DRIMBA O., Istoria teatrului universal, Bucureşti, Saeculum I. O., 2000;
FRYE N., Anatomy of Criticism, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1957;
GOULD E., Mythical Intentions in Modern Literature, Princeton, Princeton
University Press, 1981;
HIGHET G., The Classical Tradition. Greek and Roman Influences on
Western Literature, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1976;
JUMP J. J. (ed.), The Critical Idiom. Tragedy, New York, 1970;
ROSS S. D. (ed.), Art and Its Significance. An Anthology of Aesthetic
Theory, New York, State University of New York Press, 1987;
UBERSFELD A., Termenii cheie ai analizei teatrului, Iaşi, Institutul
European, 1999.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com