You are here

Home » Content

MR. "PRINCE'S JESTER" AND MS. "DISDAIN": THE MALE POWER AND WOMAN'S RESPONSE TO IT IN MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING

Journal Name:

  • Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Shakespeare’s play Much Ado About Nothing demonstrates how male power is limited through association of love in marriage. This paper will discuss marriage as an equal balance of power between the genders rather than an experience that makes women silent victims in a male-dominated society. Love and commitment will also be focused on in terms of the social duties of both sexes in a romantic marriage
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Shakespeare’in oyunu Much Ado About Nothing erkek gücünün evlilikte aşkın olmasıyla nasıl sınırlandığını gösterir. Bu makale evliliğin kadınları erkek-egemen bir toplumda sessiz kurbanlar haline getiren bir deneyim olmaktansa, cinsiyetler arasında eşit bir denge olduğunu anlatmaktadır. Ayrıca, romantik bir evlilikte aşk ve bağlılık (sadakat) her iki cinsiyetin sosyal görevleri olaması açısından da vurgulanmaktadır
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-mr.princes-jester-and-ms.disdain-male-power-and-womans-response-it-much-ado-about-nothing.pdf
  • 12
113-124
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Chambers, E. K. (1930) “Plays of the First Folio.” In Chambers, William
Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cook, Carol. (1986). "'The Sign and Semblance of Her Honor': Reading
Gender Difference in Much Ado About Nothing" Publications of the Modern
Language Association of America. New York 101:2 186-202.
Crick John. (1965). Much Ado About Nothing University of Illinois Press.
Devereaux, Mary. (1990). “Opressive Texts, Resisting Readers and the
Gendered Spectator: The New Aesthetics.” The Journal of Aesthetics and
Criticism. Fall.
Dusinberre, Juliet. (1975). Shakespeare and The Nature of Women.
MacMillan Press. London.
French, Marilyn. (1991). “Shakespeare ‘From Women’s Eyes’” Ms.
Magazine 68-70.
Friedman, Michael D. (1990). "'Hush'd on Purpose to Grace Harmony':
Wives in Silence in Much Ado About Nothing" Theatre Journal. Baltimore.
(42:3) 350-63.
Gardner, C. O., (October 1977)"Beatrice and Benedick." Theoria 49: 1-17.
Reprinted in Shakespearean Criticism, Vol. 78.
Hartley, Lodwick, (May 1965) "Claudio and the Unmerry War." College
English 26, no. 8: 609-14. Reprinted in Shakespearean Criticism, Vol. 78.
Horowitz, David. (May 1965):609-14. “Imagining the Real.” In Twentieth
Century Interpretations of MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. Ed. Walter R
.Davis. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall, 1969
Lodwick Hartley, "Claudio and the Unmerry War." College English 26, no.8
Park, Clara Claiborne. (1980). "As We Like It: How a Girl Can Be Smart
and Still Be Popular" The Woman's Part ed. Lenz, C. , Greene, G. And
Neely C.T. University of Illinois Press. London.
Shakespeare, W. Kuru Gürültü 1967 [Çeviren: Hamit Dereli], (2. Baskı),
110 s., 4 TL, MEB Dünya Edebiyatından Tercümeler, İngiliz Klasikleri: 13.
Storey, Graham. (1969) “The Success of Much Ado About Nothing.” In
Twentieth Century Interpretations of MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. Ed.
Walter R. Davis. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall,.
Taylor, Markland, (2002) "Much Ado About Nothing." Variety 388, no. 7 :
36. Reprinted in Shakespearean Criticism, Vol. 78.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com