You are here

Home » Content

Merkez-Dışı Ülkelerdeki Ulusötesi Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları (STK): Dış Politika, Finansman ve Meşruiyet

Transnational Nongovernmental Organizations in Peripheral State: Foreign Politics, Funding and Legitimacy

Journal Name:

  • Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Transnational nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are more and more becoming more important in the globalized world. These influencial NGOs in various platforms such as the United Nations can easily organize around the world and become effective in local politics. However, this is not a flawless situation. This study elaborates why the NGOs cannot be immune from some of the main problems that hinder their effectiveness, particularly NGOs in peripheral countries are taken into account. First, the NGOs operating in peripheral countries are under the influence of official or unofficial institutions that provide funding for their cause. Donors expectations do not always overlap with those of receivers, limiting their effectiveness. Second, dependence on foreign donations and the lack of transparency in their sources also negatively affect the place in local politics. Third, related to the previous two and combined with local cultural values, NGOs experience the problem of legitimacy in peripheral countries.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Soğuk savas sonrası ortaya çıkan küresellesmis dünyada ulus-ötesi sivil toplum kuruluslarının (STK) önemi giderek daha da artmaktadır. Birlesmis Milletler dahil bir çok platformda etkin olabilen bu STKlar, gelisen iletisim teknolojisi sayesinde dünyanın her yanında kolaylıkla örgütlenebilmekte ve yerel siyasetlerde etkili olmaktadırlar. Ancak bu sorunsuz bir durum değildir, özellike merkez-dısı ülkelerdeki STK’lar dikkate alındığında. Bu çalısmada, bu tür STKların daha etkin olmalarını engelleyen bazı temel sorunlardan kurtulamadıkları tartısılmaktadır. Birincisi, merkez-dısı ülkelerde faaliyet gösteren STKlar, doğal olarak kaynak sağlayan merkez ülkelerdeki sivil veya resmi kurulusların etkisi altında kalmaktadırlar. Bağısta bulunanların beklentileri yerel ihtiyaç öncelikleriyle her zaman çakısmaması nedeniyle etkileri sınırlı kalabilmektedir. Đkincisi, dıs bağıslara bağımlılık ve onların kaynağının seffaf olmaması da yine STKların yerel siyasetteki yerini olumsuz etkilemektedir. Üçüncüsü, diğer ikisiyle de bağlantılı olarak ve yerel kültürel değerlerle de birleserek STKlar, merkez-dısı ülkelerde mesruiyet sorunu yasamaktadırlar.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-merkez-disi-ulkelerdeki-ulusotesi-sivil-toplum-kuruluslari-stk-dis-politika-finansman-mesruiyet.pdf
  • 16
63-86
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahrne, Göran. 1998. ‘‘Civil Society and Uncivil Organizations’’, Real
Civil Societies içinde, derleyen Jeffrey C. Alexander, London: Sage
Publication.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (der.) 1998. Real Civil Societies. London: Sage
Publication.
Awad, Ibrahim. 1997. “The External Relations of the Arab Human Rights
Movement.” Arab Studies Quarterly 19(1): 59-75.
Ayse Kadioglu. 2005. “Civil Society, Islam and Democracy in Turkey: A
Study of Three Islamic Non-Governmental Organizations.” The
Muslim World 95(1):23-41.
Bach, Jonathan & David Stark. 2002. “Innovative Ambiguities: NGOs’
Use of Interactive Technology in Eastern Europe.” Studies in
Comparative International Development 37(2): 3-23.
Baskaya, Fikret. 2005 ‘‘Sivil Toplum ve Sivil Toplum Kurulusları
Söylemi’’, http://www.stgp.org/makaleler/sivil_toplum.pdf (Makaleye
01/07/2005 tarihinde ulasılmıstır.)
Batliwala, Srilatha. 2002. “Grassroots Movements as Transnational Actors:
Implications for Global Civil Society.” Voluntas 13(4): 393-409.
Bell, Daniel A & Joseph H Carens. 2004. “The Ethical Dilemmas of
International Human Rights and Humanitarian NGOs: Reflections on a
Dialogue Between Practitioners and Theorists.” Human Rights
Quarterly 26(2): 300-329.
Chandhoke, Neera. 1995. State and Civil Society : Explanation in Political
Theory, London: Sage Publications.
Clark, Ann Marie. 1995. “Non-Governmental Organizations and their
Influence on International Society.” Journal of International Affairs
48(2): 507-525.
Colas, Alexandro. 2002. International Civil Society, Malden: Polity Press,
DeBardeleben, Joan & John Hannigan (eds.) 1995. Environmental Security
and Quality after Communism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Mary Keegan Eamon. 2004. “Digital Divide in Computer Access and Use
between Poor and Non-Poor Youth.” Journal of Sociology and Social
Welfare.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0CYZ/is_2_31/ai_n61568
15/print
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of the History and the Last Man, New
York: Macmillan.
Gamson, William A. 1990. The Strategy of Social Protest, Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
Gellner, Ernest. 1994. Conditions of Civil Liberty: Civil Society and Its
Rivals, New York: The Penguin Pres.
Gomez, James. 2005. “International NGOs: Filling the ‘Gap’ in
Singapore’s Civil Society.” Sojourn 20(2): 177-207. Đndirilme Tarihi: 7
Subat 2006.
Hemment, Julie. 2004. “The Riddle of the Third Sector.” Anthropological
Quarterly 77(2): 215-41.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking
of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Đnsel, Ahmet. 2004. ‘‘Sivil Toplum, STK’lar ve Gönüllülük’’ (Söylesi)
http://stk.bilgi.edu.tr/docs/a_insel_st_stk.pdf.
Janoski, Thomas. 1998.Citizenship and Civil Society, New York:
Cambridge University Pres.
Keyman, Fuat. 2004. ‘‘Türkiye’de ve Avrupa’da Sivil Toplum’’, Söylesi,
http://stk.bilgi.edu.tr/docs/F_Keyman_tr-avrupa.pdf.
Krafchik, Warren. ‘‘Can Civil Socity Add Value to Budget Decision-
Making? A Description of Civil Society Budget Work.”
http://www.internationalbudget.org/resources/library/civilsociety.pdf.
Đndirilme Tarihi: 7 Subat 2006.
Lam, Janice H. 2006. “The Rise Of The Ngo In Bangladesh: Lessons On
Improving Access To Justice For Women And Religious Minorities.”
The George Washington International Law Review 38(1): 101-130.
Madison, G.B. 1998. The Political Economy of Civil Society and Human
Rights, London: Routledge.
Martens, Kertsin. 2002. “Mission Impossible? Defining Nongovernmental
Organizations.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and
Nonprofit Organizations 13(3): 271-85.
Mason, Michael. 2004. “Representing Transnational Environmental
Interests:New Opportunities for Non-Governmental Organisation
Access within the World Trade Organisation?” Environmental Politics
13(3):566-589.
McAdam, Doug & David Snow. 1997. “Social Movements: Conceptual
and Theoretical Issues.” Ss. xviii-xxvi. Social Movements: Readins on
Their Emergence, Mobilization and Dinamics. Los Angeles: Roxbury
Publishing.
Mertig, Angela G. & Dunlap, Riley E. 2001 “Environmentalism, New
Social Movements, and the New Class: A Cross-national
Investigation.” Rural Sociology 66(1): 113-36.
Orjuela, Camilla. 2005. ‘‘Dilemmas of Civil Society Aid: Donors, NGOs
and the Quest for Peace in Sri Lanka’’, Peace and Democracy in
South Asia , Vol.1, No.1.
Pfeiffer, James. 2004. “Civil Society, NGOs, and the Holy Spirit in
Mozambique.” Human Organization Washington 63(3): 359-72.
Pichardo, Nelson. A. 1997. “New Social Movements: A Critical
Review.” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 411-30.
Raniger, Luis. 1998. ‘‘Civil Society, Patronage and Democracy’’, Real
Civil Societies içinde, derleyen Jeffrey C. Alexander, London: Sage
Publication.
Rohrschneider, Robert & Dalton, Russell J. 2002. “A Global Network?
Transnational Cooperation among Environmental Groups.” Journal
of Politics 64(2): 510-33.
Schecter, Darrow. 2000. Sovereign States or Political Communities?
Civil Society and Comtemporary Politics, MManchester: Manchester
University Pres.
Seligman, Adam B. 1992. The Idea of Civil Society. New York: The Free
Press.
Smith, Jackie. 1998. “Global Civil Society?” American Behavioral
Scientist 42(1): 93-107.
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements,
Collective Action, and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Teegen, Hildy, Jonathan P Doh, Sushil Vachani. 2004. “The Importance
of Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) in Global Governance
and Value Creation: an Đnternational Business Research Agenda.”
Journal of International Business Studies 35(6): 463-83.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1966 (ilk basım 1835). Democracy in America.
Eds. by J.P. Mayer and M. Lerner. New York: Harper & Row. (1999
Amerika’da Demokrasi, Yetkin Yayınları).
Townsend, J.G. & A.R. Townsend. 2004. “Accountability, motivation
and practice: NGOs North and South.” Social & Cultural Geography
5(2): 271-284.
Trentmann, Frank (Der.). 2000. ‘‘Introduction’’, Pardoxes of Civil
Society içinde, New York: Berghahn Boks.
UNCTAD. 2004.Development and Globalization : Facts and Figures.
Warkentin, Craig & Mingst, Karen. 2000. “International Institutions, the
State, and Global Civil Society in the Age of the World Wide Web.”
Global Governance 6(2): 237-55.
Webster, Paul. 2003. “Global Fund Approves Grants to Fight HIV/AIDS
in Russia.” The Lancet 362(9397): 1729-31.
Zaidi, S.A. 1999. “NGO Failure and the Need to Bring Back the State.”
Journal of International Development 11:259-271.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com