You are here

Suçun Ekonomik Analizi: Genel Bir Değerlendirme

Economic Analysis of Crime: A Review

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper purposes to analyze crime and its general components with basic equipments of economics. Crime’s economic models in crime literature guide to achieve this destination. Existing literature in this paper contains crime supply-demand, economic models of crime and costs of crime. Exiting models and working papers show that economic indicators adjust crime supply. Also, costs of crime adjust economy as well. There are five sections in working. First of all is introduction; second section contains crime supply, demand and equilibrium; next section is generated by analyzed models from economics tools of crime. Fourth section defines costs of crime. In the last section, a general evaluation is made in light of given literature.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalısma; suç ve suç bilesenlerinin, ekonomi biliminin temel araçlarıyla analizini amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaca ulasmada, suçun ekonomik modellerinden yararlanılmıstır. Mevcut literatür temelinde hazırlanan çalısmada suç arzına ve talebine, suçun ekonomik modellerine ve suçun maliyetlerine yer verilmistir. Suçun ekonomik modelleri, ekonomik göstergelerin suç arzını belirlediğine isaret etmektedir. Ayrıca bu modellerde suç maliyetlerinin de ekonomiyi etkilediğine vurgu yapılmaktadır. Genel bir literatür değerlendirilmesi niteliğindeki çalısma bes kısımdan olusmaktadır. Birinci kısımda girise; ikinci kısımda suç arzı, talebi ve dengesi kavramlarına; üçüncü kısımda suçu ekonomik modellerine, dördüncü kısımda ise literatür bağlamında suçun bireysel ve toplumsal maliyetlerine yer verilmistir. Son kısımda ise mevcut literatür ısığında genel bir değerlendirme yapılmıstır.
35-56

REFERENCES

References: 

Arvanites, Thomas M. ve Defina Robert H. (2006), “Business Cycles and
Street Crime”, Criminology, 44(1): 139-164.
Bayley, David H. (1978), “The Future of Social Control in Japan”, Pacific
Affairs, 51(1): 24-40.
Becker, Gary S. (1968), “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach”,
Journal of Political Economy, 73: 169-217.
Becsi, Zsolt (1994), “Economics and Crime in the States”, Economic
Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 84(1): 38-56.
Berk, Richard A.; Lenihan Kenneth J. ve Rossi, Peter H. (1980), ”Crime and
Poverty: Some Experimental Evidence from Ex-Offenders”, American
Sociological Review, 45(5): 766-786.
Carnis, Laurent (2005), “Coase and Economics of Crime”, New Perspectives
on Political Economy, 1(2):1-31.
Clotfelter, Charles T. (1977), “Public Services, Private Substitutes, and the
Demand for Protection against Crime”, The American Economic Review,
67(5): 867-877.
Cohen, Mark A. (2005), The Cost of Crime and Justice. New York:
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Cohen, Lawrence E.; Kluegel James R. ve Land, Kenneth C. (1981), “Social
Inequality and Predatory Criminal Victimization: An Exposition and
Test of a Formal Theory”, American Sociological Review, 46(5): 505-
524.
Cohen, Mark A., Ted R. Miller, ve Shelli B. Rossman. (1994). “The costs
and consequences of violent behavior in the United States”, In
Understanding and preventing violence, Volume 4: Consequences and
control, (Albert J. Reiss, Jr., and Jeffrey A. Roth tarafından
düzenlenmistir.) Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Cohen, Mark A. (2000), “Measuring the Costs and Benefits of Crime and
Justice”, Criminal Justice 2000, 4: 263-316.
www..ncjrs.org/criminal_justice2000/vol_4/04f.pdf.
Donohue, John J. (2007), “Economic Models of Crime and Punishment”,
Social Research, 74(2): 379-412.
Doyle, Joanne M.; Ahmet, Ehsan ve Horn Robert N. (1999), “The Effects of
Labor Markets and Income Inequality on Crime: Evidence from Panel
Data”, Southern Economic Journal, 65(4): 717-738.
Ehrlich, Isaac (1973), “Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theorical
and Emprical Investigation”, The Journal of Political Economy, 81(3):
521-565.
Ehrlich, Isaac (1981), “On the Usefulness of Controlling Individuals: An
Economic Analysis of Rehabilitation, Incapacitation and Deterrence”,
The American Economic Review, 71(3): 307-322.
Ehrlich, Isaac (1996), “Crime, Punishment, and the Market for Offenses”,
The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1): 43-67.
Evans, Robert (1977), “Changing Labor Markets and Criminal Behavior in
Japan”, The Journal of Asian Studies, 36(3): 477-489.
Fadaei-Tehrani, Reza ve Green, Thomas M. (2002), “Crime and Society”,
International Journal of Social Economics, 29(9/10): 781-795.
Fajnzylber, Pablo; Lederman, Daniel ve Loayza, Norman (2000), “Crime
and Victimization: An Economic Perspective”, Economia, 1(1): 219-
302.
Fleisher, Belton M. (1963), “The Effect of Unemployment on Juvenile
Delinquency”, The Journal of Political Economy, 71(6): 543-555.
Gibbons, Steve (2004), “The Costs of Urban Property Crime”, The
Economic Journal, 114: 441-463.
Glaeser, Edward L.; Sacerdote, Bruce ve Scheinkman, José A. (1996),
“Crime and Social Interactions”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
111(2): 507-548.
Greenberg, David F. (1985), “Age, Crime, and Social Explanation”, The
America Journal of Sociology, 91(1): 1-21.
Grogger, Jeff (1998), “Market Wages and Youth Crime”, Journal of Labor
Economics, 16(4): 756-791.
Hoffman, Joan (2003), “Legal Responsiveness: A Contribution to Structural
Theory of Economic Crime”, International Journal of Social Economics,
30(3): 255-274.
Lochner, Lance ve Moretti, Enrico (2004), “The Effect of Education on
Crime: Evidence from Prison Inmates, Arrests, and Self-Reports”, The
American Economic Review, 94(1): 155-189.
Öncü, Fatih ve diğerleri (2007), “Sosyoekonomik Etmenlerin ve
Sosyodemografik Özelliklerin Psikotik Olguların Suç Đslemesinde
Etkisi”, Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 18(1): 4-12.
Pazarlıoğlu, M. Vedat ve Turgutlu, Timur (2007), “Gelir, Đssizlik ve Suç:
Türkiye Üzerine Bir Đnceleme”, Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar,
44(513): 63-70.
Piliavin, Irving ve diğerleri (1986), “Crime, Deterrence and, Rational
Choice”, American Sociological Review, 51(1): 101-119.
Pudney, Stephen; Deadman, Derek ve Pyle, David (2000), “The Relationship
between Crime, Punishment and Economic Conditions: Is Reliable
Inference Possible When Crimes Are Under-Recorded?”, Journal of the
Royal Statistical Society, 163(1): 81-97.
Riemer, Svend (1942), “Theory and Quantitative Analysis in Criminological
Research”, The American Journal of Sociology, 48(2): 188-201.
Sah, Raaj K. (1991), “Social Osmosis and Patterns of Crime”, The Journal of
Political Economy, 99(6): 1272-1295.
Shavit, Yossi ve Rattner, Arye (1988), “Age, Crime, and Early Life Course”,
The American Journal of Sociology, 93(6): 1457-1470.
Sherman, Lawrance W.; Smith, Douglas A.; Schmidt Janell D. ve Rogan
Dennis P. (1992), “Crime, Punishment, and Stake in Conformity: Legal
and Informal Control of Domestic Violence”, American Sociological
Review, 57(5): 680-690.
Tella, Rafael Di; Schargrodsky, Ernesto, (2004), “Do Police Reduce Crime
Estimates Using The Allocation of Police ForcesAfter a Terrorist
Attack”, The American Economic Review, 94(1): 115-133.
Welsh, Brandon C. (2000), “Economic Analysis of Crime Prevention”,
International Centre for the Prevention of Crime and the National Crime
Prevention Centre’in düzenlediği Consultation on Cost-Benefit Analyses
of Crime Prevention Programs’da yayınlanan bildiri, Ottowa, Canada,
January 24-25.
Witte, Ann Dryden ve Witt, Robert (2000), “Crime Causation: Economic
Theories”, (Preprint, 2000-07-19, Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice).
htpp://www.econ.survey.ac.uk/WorkingPapers/econ300.pdf, 27/12/2007.
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/documents/offensedefinitions.pdf,
03/01/2008.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com