You are here

Home » Content

İLKÖĞRETİM OKULU MÜDÜRLERİNİN ALGILARINA GÖRE DÖRT LİDERLİK ÇERÇEVESİ MODELİ KULLANIMI

USAGE OF FOUR LEADERSHIP FRAME MODEL ACCORDING TO PRIMARY SCHOOL MANAGERS PERCEPTION

Journal Name:

  • Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this research is to investigate the four leadership frames of primary school managers by their perception and whether there is any significance differences between perceptions with teachers who are working with those managers. The sample of this research which used survey model and quantitative techniques composed of 618 teachers working for central Denizli primary schools and their 26 managers.These subjects were selected by proportional cluster sampling. The data of this research was collected by administaring one instrument: “Leadership Orientation Questionnaire (LOQ)” developed by Bolman and Deal (1991). The data collected was analized by employing several statistical techniques including mean, standart deviation and Mann-Whitney U. Findings are: according to managers’ perceptions they display human resource leadership, structural leadership, political leadership and symbolic leadership respectively. A significant difference has been calculated between teacher and administrator perceptions towards human resources leadership behaviors of school administrators.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı ilköğretim okulu müdürlerinin algılarına göre kendi liderlik çerçevesi kullanımlarını belirlemek ve ilköğretim okulu müdürlerinin çerçeve kullanımına ilişkin algıları ile kendi okullarındaki öğretmenlerin onların çerçeve kullanımına ilişkin algıları arasında fark olup olmadığını incelemektir. Bu amaçla iki soruya yanıt aranmıştır: 1) İlköğretim Okulu Müdürlerinin liderlik tarzlarına ilişkin algıları nedir? 2)İlköğretim Okulu müdürlerinin liderlik tarzlarına ilişkin algıları örgütsel rollere göre farklılık göstermekte midir? Tarama modeli ve nicel yöntemlerin kullanıldığı araştırmanın örneklemi, Denizli il merkezindeki ilköğretim okullarında çalışan ve oranlı küme örneklemi yoluyla seçilen 618 öğretmen ve onların 26 okul müdüründen oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri, Bolman ve Deal (1991) tarafından geliştirilen “Leadership Orientation Questionaire (LOQ)” aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın alt problemlerinin çözümlenmesinde aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma ve non-parametrik testlerden Mann – Whitney U testi kullanılmıştır. İlköğretim okulu müdürlerinin kendi algılarına göre liderlik çerçeveleri sırasıyla insan kaynaklı, yapısal, politik ve sembolik liderlik olmuştur. Örgütsel rollere göre insan kaynaklı liderlik boyutuna ilişkin öğretmen ve müdürlerin algıları arasında anlamlı bir fark çıkmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ilkogretim-okulu-mudurlerinin-algilarina-gore-dort-liderlik-cercevesi-modeli-kullanimi.pdf
  • 1
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Aydın, M. (1991). Eğitim Yönetimi, Hatiboğlu Yayınevi, Ankara.
Baker, B. (2008) . Leadership Orientation and Effectiveness of Chief Student Affairs Officers on Coalition of Christian Colleges and Universities Campuses. Unpublished Doctoral Disertation, The School of Graduate Studies Department of Educational Leadership, Administration & Foundations, Indiana State University Terre Haute, Indiana.
Barnard, C. I.(1938). The Functions of the Executive. Harward University Pres,Cambridge, Massachusetts,and London,England.
Başaran, İ. E. (1992). Örgütsel Davranış, Gül Yayınevi, Ankara.
Bennett, V. J. S. (2006). A Study of The Effectiveness of a Diverse Workforce Within Nonprofit Organizations Serving Older Adults: An Analysis of The Impact of Leadership Styles and Organizational Culture. Unpublished Doctoral Disertation, Capella University.
Bolman, L., Deal, T. E. (1991). Images of leadership. NCEL Occasional Paper No. 7, January, Nashville, TN: National Center for Educational Leadership.
Bolman, L., Deal, T. (2003). Reframing organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bolman, L., Deal, T. (2008). Organizasyonları Yeniden Yapılandırmak (Çev. A. Aypay, A. Tanrıöğen). Seçkin Yayıncılık. Ankara (Eserin orijinali 2003’te yayınlandı).
Cochran, W. (1962). Sampling Techniques. Newyork: John Wiley Sons Inc.
Dereli, M. (2003). A Survey Research of Leadership Styles of Elementary School Principals. Middle East Technical University, Master of Science in Educational Sciences, unpublished master thesis.
Dias, M. H. (2009). The Leadership Perspectives of Former Student Government Presidents and the Post-College Impact of the Presidency. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation ). The Faculty of The Graduate School of Education and Human Development of The George Washington University.
Groopman, J. (2007). How Doctors Think. Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Journal of Research in Education and Teaching
Şubat 2014 Cilt:3 Sayı:1 Makale No: 33 ISSN: 2146-9199
358
Hall, R. A. (2010). A Quantitative Study of Differences in Leadership Frames of Community College Presidents of the Babby Boomer and Generation X Generations. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation) , Capella University.
Harrell, A. P. (2006). An analysis of the perceived leadership orientation of senior student affairs officers and the work satisfaction of their professional staff subordinates in the North Carolina Community College System. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), East Carolina University.
Higgins, B. C.(2008). An Evaluation of the Relationship of Nursing School Administrators’ Leadership Frame Orientation to Faculty Perceptions of Job Satisfaction and Leadership Effectiveness. University of Missouri-Columbia, unpublished doctoral thesis.
Law, S., Glower, D. (2000). Educational Leadership and Learning: Practice, Policy and Research., Philadelphia.
Lipham, J.(1963). Learned and Administration., Chicago.
Lunenburg F.C., Ornstein A.C. (1996). Educational Administration Concepts and Practice., Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Mann Gagliardo, J. C. (2006). Temperament types and perceived leadership styles of North Carolina community college Chief Academic Officers. Unpublished Ed.D., EastCarolina University, United States, North Carolina.
Messer, J. E. (2002). Elementary Principal Leadership Orientations and Selected Professional and School Variables. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Department of Instructional Programs and Educational Leadership in the College of Education , University of Central Florida,Orlando.
Robbins, S. (1998). Organizational Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies, Applications. Upper saddle, NJ: Allyn and Bacon.
Redman, T., Wilkinson, A. (2006). Contemporary Human Resources Management., 2’nd Ed., Prentice Hall, Essex.
Şimşek, H. (2007). Toplam Kalite Yönetimi: Kuram, İlkeler, Uygulamalar. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Tedesco, P. T. (2004). Leadership style comparison: Iowa community college presidents and superintendents and the ideal leadership style perceived by the board of presidents of these organizations. Unpublished Ph.D., Colorado State University, United States, Colorado.
Torres, G. K. (2009). Perceptions of Michigan Middle School Principals Regarding Leadership Styles, Communication, and School Climate. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Tripuraneni, V. L. (2010). Leader or Manager: Academic Library Leader’s Leadership Orientation Considered Ideal by Faculty, Administrators and Librarians at Private, Nonprofit, Doctoral Universities in Southern California. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). School of Education and Organizational Leadership, Organizational Leadership Department, University of La Verne, California.
Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z. Reading, MA. Addison-Wesley.
Zel, U. (2001). Kisilik ve Liderlik: Evrensel Boyutlarıyla Yönetsel Açıdan Arastırmalar, Teoriler ve Yorumlar. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com