You are here

Home » Content

TAKIMLAŞTIRMA SÜRECİ OLARAK SINIF DÜZENİ: OKUL ÖNCESİ BİR SINIFTA KARŞILIKLI ETKİLEŞİMSEL KAZANIM

CLASSROOM ORDER AS COHORTING PRACTICES: A MUTUAL INTERACTIONAL ACHIEVEMENT IN A KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOM

Journal Name:

  • Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
As the part of a larger project aiming at unearthing the role of classroom interaction in the construction of classroom order, this study presented a sample of order mechanism in the classroom environment. Rooted in the theoretical and methodological principles of conversation analysis, it investigated the mechanism of how the order in the classroom was established, organized and sustained mutually by the teacher and students. The classroom talk of 20 children aging from 3 to 5 in a laboratory kindergarten located at a Midwestern university in the United States was recorded for one week. The analysis focused on the scenes of trouble that revealed the interactional organization of order with particular reference to the participants’ demonstrable actions. The closer look at the order mechanism suggested that the order in the classroom was a mutual achievement constructed in the details of classroom interactions.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Sınıf içindeki etkilesimin, sınıf düzenini yapılandırmadaki rolünü ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlayan, genis kapsamlı arastırmanın bir parçası olan bu çalısma, temel olarak sınıf düzenini saglayan bir düzenek örnegi sunmustur. Kökleri konusma çözümlemesinin kurumsal ve yöntemsel ilkelerine dayanan bu çalısma, sınıf düzeninin nasıl kuruldugunu, örgütlendigini ve devam ettirildigini ortaya koymaya çalısmıstır. Amerika Birlesik Devletleri’nin ortabatısında yer alan bir üniversitede okul öncesi sınıfa devam eden, yasları 3 ile 5 arasında degisen 20 çocugun sınıf içindeki konusmaları bir hafta boyunca kaydedilmistir. Arastırma, katılımcıların gözlemlenebilir davranıslarını temel alarak sınıf düzenin yeniden olusturuldugu anlara odaklanmıstır. Düzeni olusturan düzeneklerin ayrıntılı incelenmesi sonucunda sınıf içindeki düzenin, sınıftaki etkilesimin ayrıntılarında olusmus karsılıklı bir kazanım oldugunu gösterilmistir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon 98-357-1-pb.pdf
  • 1
50-67
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Bremme, D. W., & Erickson, F. (1977). Relationships among verbal and
nonverbal classroom behaviors. Theory into Practice, 5(3), 153-161.
Bloome, D., Puro, P., & Theodorou, E. (1989). Procedural display and classroom
lessons. Curriculum Inquiry, 19(3), 265-291.
Brophy, J. (2006). History of research on classroom management. In C. M.
Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management:
Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 3-15). Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock
(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 392-431). New York:
Macmillan.
Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Classroom management as a field of
inquiry. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of
classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp.
3-15). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Heap, J. L. (1982) Understanding classroom events: A critique of Durkin, with an
alternative. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14(4), 391-411.
Icbay, M. A. (2008). The role of classroom interaction in the construction of
classroom order: A conversation analytic study. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation. Middle East Technical University.
Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent
acceptance/declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in
ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington.
Macbeth, D. (1987). Management’s work: The social organization of order and
troubles in secondary classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
University of California, Berkeley.
Macbeth, D. (1992). Classroom “floors”: Material organizations as a course of
affairs. Qualitative Sociology, 15(2), 123-150.
Macbeth, D. (2003). Hugh Mehan’s Learning Lessons reconsidered: On the
differences between the naturalistic and critical analysis of classroom
discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 239-280.
Macbeth, D. (2004). The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language
in Society, 33, 703-736.
McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom.
Language and Society, 7, 183-213.
Mehan, H. (1982). Children in and out of school. In P. Gilmore & A. Glatthorn
(Eds.), Ethnography and education. Washington, DC: Center for Applied
Linguistics.
Payne, G., & Hustler, D. (1980). Teaching the class: The practical management of
a cohort. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1(1), 49-66.
Sacks, H. (1984a). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.),
Structures of social actions: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1984b). On doing “being ordinary”. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage
(Eds.), Structures of social actions: Studies in conversation analysis.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1-2, G. Jefferson, Ed.). Oxford:
Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematic for the
organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
Shultz, J., & Florio, S. (1979). Stop and freeze: The negotiation of social and
physical space in a kindergarten/first grade classroom. Anthropology &
Education Quarterly, 10(3), 166-181.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com