You are here

Home » Content

A DECISION MAKER SYSTEM FOR ACADEMICIAN SELECTION WITH FUZZY WEIGHTING AND FUZZY RANKING

Journal Name:

  • Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study an academician selection system has been developed for universities using fuzzy weighting and fuzzy ranking. In the system, effects of many criteria and views of many experts are evaluated for selection. Number of criteria, number of linguistic variables of criteria, names of linguistic variables, membership functions of linguistic variables, number of experts and alternatives can be changed in our system. Experts can determine importances of criteria and performance of each alternative for each criter as linguistic or numerical. The system weights the alternatives using standard fuzzy arithmetic and ranks as fuzzy. In our system maximizing set and minimizing set method has been used for ranking alternatives.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-decision-maker-system-academician-selection-fuzzy-weighting-and-fuzzy-ranking.pdf
  • 25
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

CHEN, C. and C. M. KLEIN (1997), “An Efficient Approach to Solving Fuzzy
MADM Problems”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 88, pp. 51-67.
Constitution of Republic of Turkey (1982), Regulations of Graduate Education,
Law No. 2547, 130.
DUBOIS, D. and H. PRADE (1980), “Ranking of Fuzzy Numbers in The Setting
of Possibility Theory”, Information Science 30, pp. 183-224.
LEE, E.S. and R.L. LI (1988), “Comparison of Fuzzy Numbers Based on The
Probability Measure of Fuzzy Events”, Computers and Mathematics
with Applications, 15, pp. 887–896.
ZIMMERMANN, H.J. (1987), Fuzzy Set, Decision Making and Expert System,
Kluwer, Boston.
BUCKLEY, J.J. (1984), “The Multiple Judge, Multiple Criteria Ranking Problems
- A Fuzzy Set Approach” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 13, pp. 25-37.
BUCKLEY, J.J. (1985), “Ranking Alternatives Using Fuzzy Numbers”, Fuzzy
Sets and Systems, 15, pp. 21-31.
ZADEH, L.A. (1968), “Fuzzy Algorithms”, Info. & Ctl., 12, pp. 94-102.
ZADEH, L.A. (1984), “Making Computers Think Like People”, IEEE Spectrum,
8, pp. 26-32.
ZADEH, L.A. (1965), “Fuzzy Sets”, Information and Control, 2, pp. 338-353.
ZADEH, L.A. (1973), “Outline of A New Approach to The Analysis of Complex
Systems and Decision Processes”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man,
and Cybernetics, 3, pp. 28-44.
RAJ, P.A. and D.N. KUMAR (1999), “Ranking Alternatives With Fuzzy Weights
Using Maximizing Set and Minimizing Set”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems,
105, pp. 365-375.
RIBEIRO, R.A. (1996), “Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: A Review
and New Preference Elicitation Techniques”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78,
pp. 155-181.
CHEN, S.H. (1985), “Ranking Fuzzy Numbers With Maximizing Set and
Minimizing Set”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, pp. 113-129.
CHEN, S.H and C.L. HWANG, “Fuzzy Multiple attribute Decision Making
Methods and Applications”, in. Lecture Notes in Economics and
Mathematical Systems, Springer, Berlin, 1992.
SIMONOVIC, S.P. (2001), Fuzzy Set Ranking Methods and Multiple Expert
Decision Making, The University of Western Ontario, Ontario.
The MathWorks Inc. (1999), Fuzzy Logic Toolbox User’s Guide.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com