You are here

A FOUCALDIAN READING OF HAROLD PINTER’S OLD TIMES

HAROLD PINTER’IN ESKİ ZAMANLAR ADLI OYUNUNUN FOUCAULTCU SÖYLEM BAĞLAMINDA İNCELENMESİ

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Bu çalışma Harold Pinter’in Eski Zamanlar adlı tiyatro eserinde karakterler Deeley, Kate ve Anna arasındaki sevgi ve mekana sahip olmak ve birbirleri üzerinde hakimiyet kurmak için yürütülen güç mücadelesini Foucault’nun söylem, güç, bilgi ve direnç üzerine olan teorisi ışığında ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Karakterlerin bu mücadeleyi söylem ve karşı söylem üreterek, bilgi ve gerçeklik imal ederek ve geçmiş hatıraları bozup yeniden inşa ederek nasıl sürdürdükleri tartışılacaktır. Karakterler boyun eğdirme, istismar ve mağdur etmenin de dahil olduğu çeşitli manevralara ve stratejilere başvurarak hem güç uygulamakta hem de güce karşı koymaktadırlar. Ancak yine de karakterler arasındaki bu savaş, kazananı ve kaybedeni olmayan bir mücadeledir çünkü güç, oyunun sonuna kadar sürekli olarak el değiştirmekte ve karakterlerin birbirine karşı kurdukları ittifaklar sürekli değişerek yeniden dizayn edilmektedir.
Abstract (Original Language): 
This paper aims to examine the power struggle initiated for dominance, the possession of territory and love between the characters Deeley, Kate and Anna in Harold Pinter`s play Old Times in the light of Foucault`s theory on discourse, power, knowledge and resistance. It explains how the on-going battle is carried out through the production of discourses and counter-discourses, the fabrication of truth and knowledge and the reconstruction and deconstruction of past memories. The characters exert and resist the power by employing various strategies and maneuvers including subjugation, victimization and exploitation. Nevertheless, this is a battle with no ultimate winner and loser since power rapidly keeps changing hand, and the alliances formed by the characters against each other are constantly altering and redesigned.
33
56

REFERENCES

References: 

Adler, Thomas P. “Notes Toward the Archetypal Woman.” Theatre Journal. 33. 3
(Oct., 1981): 377-385.
Bernauer, James and David Rasmussen, eds. The Final Foucault. Cambridge: MIT
Press, 1987.
Billington, Michael. Harold Pinter. London: Faber and Faber Limited, 2007.
Cahn, Victor L. Gender and Power in the Plays of Harold Pinter. New York: St.
Martin’s Press, 1993.
Foucault, Michel. “The Ethics of the Concern for the Self as a Practice of
Freedom.” The Essential Works of Foucault. Ed. Paul Rabinow. New York:
New Press, 1997, 2003.
--------------------- The History of Sexuality, vol. 3, The Care of the Self. Trans.
Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage, 1988.
--------------------- Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Eds.
Martin, L.H. et al. London: Tavistock, 1988.
--------------------- “The Subject and Power.” Beyond Structuralism and
Hermeneutics. Eds. Hubert Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1982, 1983.
--------------------- The History of Sexuality, vol 1. New York: Random House,
1980.
--------------------- Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings
1972-1977. Ed. Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon, 1980.
---------------------Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. A.
Sheridan. New York: Vintage, 1979.
---------------------The Archeology of Knowledge. Trans. A. Sheridan Smith.
London: Tavistock Publications, 1972.
Kreitzman, Lawrence, ed. Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture. New
York: Routledge, 1998.
Milne, Drew. “Pinter’s Sexual Politics.” The Cambridge Companion to Harold
Pinter. Ed. Peter Raby. Cambridge University Press, 2001. 199–211.
O’Grady, Helen. “An Ethics of the Self.” Feminism and the Final Foucault. Eds.
Dianna Taylor and Karen Vintges. Urbana, Chicago: University of Illinois,
2004.
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı: 32 Yıl:2012/1 (33-56 s.)
56

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com