You are here

ULUSLARARASI HUKUKTA DEVLETLERİN EGEMEN EŞİTLİĞİ KAVRAMININ JUS COGENS NİTELİĞİ

JUS COGENS QUALIFICATION OF THE SOVEREIGN EQUALITY PRINCIPLE OF STATES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Some cases in international law is one of the exceptional cases where a partial transfer of state sovereignty. Jus cogens refers to the provisions of these exceptional cases in international law. Prohibition of slavery, prevention of human rights violations, sovereignty, sovereign equality, etc. shown as an example of jus cogens. In this point The importance of jus cogens are being sourced from the premise of the development of international humanitarian law needs. In this context jus cogens has great importance for the development of international law. However, exceptions and violations of jus cogens has also opened the door to corruption to essence of concept. In this aspect the concept of sovereignty equality of states is among the controversial issues of jus cogens. Violation of the principle of sovereign equality of states is overshadowed to jus cogens character of this concept. In this respect the evaluation of the concept of sovereign equality of states is important. The main objective of the study; to discover the jus cogens nature of concept of sovereign equality of states and to highlight the violations. So jus cogens nature of the concept of sovereign equality will be analyzed. Almost none of the state's in the international system, is not equal on issues such as geography, population, military and economic power, social structure. But it is accepted that all states have a universally accepted absolute sovereignty over their territory over. At this point if states reveals UN conditions such as country, population and independent constituion, states is accepted as equal and sovereign. Some cases in international law is one of the exceptional cases where a partial transfer of state sovereignty. Jus cogens refers to the provisions of these exceptional cases in international law. Prohibition of slavery, prevention of human rights violations, sovereignty, sovereign equality, etc. shown as an example of jus cogens. In this point The importance of jus cogens are being sourced from the premise of the development of international humanitarian law needs. The concept of jus cogens which is used first time in Vienna Convention is created with the aim to highlight the rights and obligations of states under international law. The French representative worked to increase the efficiency of France's congress by competing with smaller states and restricting their sovereignty. After this initiative, the Great Powers of of the period, Great Britain, Russia, Prussia and Austria signed a protocol and other countries were considered equal and sovereign in the international system, although all other factors were not important. Thus, the principle of the sovereign equality has been laid to be the norm of jus cogens. In this congress, the concept of the primitive norm used for the first time is generally used to express certain rules without exception. In this context, the jus cogens concept of international law has been accepted as part of the doctrine of natural law and has foreseen that states must comply with certain rules of international law. At this point, jus cogens rules are important in terms of being hierarchically superior to other legal rules. However, there is a dilemma about the imperative norms, as there is no sanction mechanism, which is the most fundamental problem of international law, and states pursue more political goals in bilateral relations. For example, while the sovereign equality of states is regarded as a jus cogens rule, the existence of the United Nations Security Council emerges as a dilemma. This situation directly contradicts the principle that jus cogens rules can not be breached. In this respect, examination of the matter is important. In this study, firstly a conceptual framework will be formed by focusing on the concepts of state, sovereignty and equality of states. Then, in context of concept such us sovereignty and sovereign equality, the relation with the jus cogens principle of the sovereign equality of states will be dealt with. Finally, the debate over whether or not the concept of sovereign equality of states will be jus cogens will be discussed, and the approaches put forward in this issue will be discussed and a conclusion will be reached.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Uluslararası hukukta bazı meseleler devletlerin kısmi olarak egemenliklerini devrettikleri istisnai durumlardandır. Jus cogens kurallar bu istisnai durumların uluslararası hukuktaki karşılığını ifade etmektedir. Jus cogense örnek olarak köleliğin yasaklanması, insan hakları ihlallerinin önlenmesi, egemenlik, egemen eşitlik vs. gösterilebilir. Bu açıdan jus cogensin önemi insancıl bir uluslararası hukuk ihtiyacının gelişmesinin öncülü olmasından kaynaklıdır. Bu bağlamda jus cogens uluslararası hukukun gelişimi açısından büyük önem arz etmektedir. Ancak jus cogensin istisnaları ve ihlalleri kavramın özünün bozulmasına da kapı açmıştır. Devletlerin egemen eşitliği kavramı da bu yönüyle jus cogensin tartışmalı konuları arasında yer almaktadır. Devletlerin egemen eşitliği ilkesinin ihlal edilmesi bu kavramın jus cogens niteliğine gölge düşürmektedir. Bu açıdan devletlerin egemen eşitliği kavramının değerlendirilmesi önemlidir. Çalışmanın temel amacı ise; devletlerin egemen eşitliği kavramının jus cogens niteliğinin ortaya çıkarılması ve ihlallerinin ortaya konulmasıdır. Böylece egemen eşitlik kavramının jus cogens niteliği vurgulanmış olacaktıra
37
53

REFERENCES

References: 

Anand, R.P., Sovering Equality of States and International Law, Hope India Publications,
2008.
| 49 |
Uluslararası Hukukta Devletlerin Egemen Eşitliği Kavramının Jus Cogens Niteliği
ERÜSOSBİLDER
XLII, 2017/1
CC: BY-NC-ND 4.0
Beckman, Robert, Butte, Dagmar, “Introduction to International Law”,
https://www.ilsa.org/jessup/intlawintro.pdf (E.T. 06.06.2014)
Beriş, H. Emrah,” Egemenlik Kavramının Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Geleceği Üzerine Bir
Değerlendirme”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, S.63, C.1. 2007.
Birleşmiş Milletler Sözleşmesi, http://www.ombudsman.gov.tr/contents/files/35501-
Birlesmis-Milletler-Antlasmasi.pdf
Criddle, Evan J., Decent, Evan Fox., “A Fiduciary Theory of Jus Cogens”, The Yale
Journal of International Law, C.34, S.33. 2009.
Çapar, Selim, Şükrü Yıldırım, “Hobbes ve Locke’un Devlet Düşüncesine Katkıları”,
http://www.arem.gov.tr/ortak_icerik/arem/Makale/Hobbes&Locke%28Capar-
Yildirim%29.pdf (E.T. 11.06.2014)
Denk, Erdem, Uluslararası Antlaşmalar Hukukunda Jus Cogens Kurallar, Ankara
Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, C. 56, S. 2. 2001.
“Doctrine Of Equality of States”, http://legaldictionary.
thefreedictionary.com/Doctrine+of+Equality+of+States (E.T.
16.06.2014)
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., Sovereign Equality Obsolete? Understanding Twenty-First Century
International Organizations, J. E. Nijman and W. G. Werner (ed.), Netherlands
Yearbook of International Law 2012.
Dickinson, Edwin Dewitt., The Equality of States in International Law, Cambridge
Harvard University Press, London, 1920, ss.280. (e-book:
https://archive.org/stream/cu31924007494820#page/n7/mode/2up)
Evans, Gareth, Sahnoun, Mohamed ve Diğerleri, The Responsibilty to Protect Report of
the International Commission on Interventionand State Sovereignty, International
Development Research Center, Canada, 2001.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor, “Democratic States and the Sovereign Equality Norm”,
http://kktg.net/kurt/publications/pubs/Sovereign%20Equality.pdf (E.T.
15.06.2014)
Gün, Ö. Rengin., “Örgütlenme İlkeleri Ve Örgüt Yönetimi Perspektifinden Birleşmiş
Milletler’in Analizi”, Avrasya Dosyası, BM Özel, C. 8, S.1, 2002.
Güneş, Şule Anlar., “Uluslararası Toplumun Ortak Değerleri Sorunu, Çevrenin
Korunması ve Jus Cogens Doktrini”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, C. 59, S. 4.
2004.
Hakyemez, Yusuf Şevki, “Çoğunlukçu Demokrasi Anlayışı Rousseau ve Türk
Anayasaları Üzerine”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, S.4, C.52,
2003.
Held, David., The Changing Structure of International Law: Sovereignty Transformed?,
http://www.polity.co.uk/global/pdf/GTReader2eHeld.pdf (E.T. 19.06.2014)
| 50 |
Yasin ÖZTÜRK
ERÜSOSBİLDER
XLII, 2017/1
CC: BY-NC-ND 4.0
Hossain, Kamrul, “The Concept of Jus Cogens and the Obligation Under The U.N
Charter”, Santa Clara Journal of International Law, C.3, S.1, 2005.
Karakoç, İrem, “Uluslararası Hukukta Emredici Kural Olgusuna Tarihsel Bir Yaklaşım”,
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 8, S. 1, 2006.
Kelsen, Hans, “The Principle of Sovereign Equality of States as a Basis for International
Organization”, The Yale Law Journal, C. 53, S. 2, 2007.
Kiraz, Sami, “Uluslararası İlişkilerde Egemenliğin Değişen Yüzü”, Niğde Üniversitesi
İİBF Dergisi, C.5, S.1, 2012.
Kingsbury, Benedict., “Sovereign and Inequality”, European Journal of International
Law, S. 9, 1998.
Koskenniemi, Martti., “The Politics of International Law”,
http://v880.derecho.unam.mx:8083/papime/pdf/4.pdf (E.T. 19.06.2014)
Krisch, Nico., “International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the
Shaping of the International Legal Order”, The European Journal of International
Law, C. 16, S.3. 2005.
Moscow Conference; http://www.un.org/en/sections/history-united-nationscharter/
1943-moscow-and-teheran-conferences/index.html (E.T. 13.06.2014)
Nahar, Snigdha., “Sovereign Equality Principle in International Law”,
http://www.globalpolitician.com/print.asp?id=4351 (E.T. 19. 06. 2014)
Nieto-Navia, Rafael., “International Peremtory Norms (Jus Cogens) and International
Humanitarian Law”, (ed. Lah Chand Vohrah, Faousto Pocar...vd.), Man’s
Unhumanity To Man Essays On International Law In Jonour Of Antony Cassese,
Kluwer Law International, 2003.
Öğüt, Selman., “Egemen Eşitlik Prensibine Modern Uluslararası Hukuk Açısından Bir
İstisna Hali Olarak Yaklaşma”, MÜHF – HAD, C. 19, S. 3.
Özman, M. Aydoğan, “Devletlerin Egemenliği ve Milletlerarası Teşekküller”, Ankara
Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C.21, S.1-4, 1964.
Pazarcı, Hüseyin, Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri II. Kitap, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal
Bilgiler Fakültesi Basın-Yayın Yüksekokulu Basımevi, Ankara-1989.
Preub, Ulrich K., “Devletlerin Eşitliği ve Anayasal Bir Küresel Düzende Anlamı”,
Hacettepe Hukuk Fak. Dergisi, C. 1, S. 1, Çeviren: Aydın Atılgan, 2011.
Roth, Brad R., Sovereign Equality and Non-Liberal Regimes, J. E. Nijman and W. G.
Werner (ed.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 2012.
Stirk, Peter M. R., “The Westphalian Model And Sovereign Equality”, Review of
International Studies, C.38, S.3, 2012.
Şimşek, Galip Engin, “Uluslararası Hukukta Kişilik”, Ayşenur Tütüncü, Elif Uzun(Ed.)
Uluslararası Hukuk I, T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını No: 2567, Açık Öğretim
Fakültesi Yayını No:1537, Eskişehir, 2013.
| 51 |
Uluslararası Hukukta Devletlerin Egemen Eşitliği Kavramının Jus Cogens Niteliği
ERÜSOSBİLDER
XLII, 2017/1
CC: BY-NC-ND 4.0
Trindade, Antônio Augusto Cançado, “Jus Cogens the Determınatıon and The Gradual
Expansıon of Its Materıal Content In Contemporary Internatıonal Case-Law”,
http://www.oas.org/dil/esp/3%20-%20cancado.LR.CV.3-30.pdf (E.T. 13.06.2014)
Uygun, Oktay, “Küreselleşme ve Değişen Egemenlik Anlayışının Sosyal Haklara Etkisi”
http://www.anayasa.gov.tr/files/pdf/anayasa_yargisi/anyarg20/uygun.pdf
Vienna Convention on the law of treaties (with annex). Concluded at Vienna on 23 May
1969, https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/unts/volume%201155/volume-
1155-i-18232-english.pdf (E.T. 14.06.2015)

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com