You are here

Home » Content

Uluslararası Rejim Kavramı Üzerine Kavramsal Bir İnceleme: Yapısalcı, Kurumsal ve Bilişsel Temel Teoriler

Conceptual Analysis of the Concept of Interna-tional Regime: Basic Structural, Institutional, and Cognitive Theories

Journal Name:

  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aims to present conceptual and ana-lytical framework in the subject of the concept of international regime. It attempts to understand the processes of international regime formation by analyzing three main approaches. In the first chapter, the concept of International Regimes is defined. Second, structural, institutional and cognitive approaches are analyzed within the framework of the concepts of power, interest and knowledge. In the following section, the third section, the structural (power-based) and cognitive (knowledge-based) approaches are investigated in detail.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale uluslararası rejim kavramı konusunda kavramsal ve analitik bir çerçeve sunmak amacındadır. Bunu yaparken uluslararası rejim-leri inşa edilmesi ve şekillenmesi ile ilgili üç ana yaklaşım incelenecektir. İlk bölümde, Uluslararası Rejim kavramı tanımlanmıştır. İkinci olarak, uluslararası rejimi inşası ve şekillenmesi yaklaşımlarından yapısal, kurumsal ve bilişsel yaklaşımlar güç, çıkar ve bilgi kavramları çerçevesinde ayrıntılı analiz edilmiştir. Bu bölümü izleyen üçüncü bölümde yapısal (güce dayalı) ve bilişsel (bilgiye dayalı) yaklaşımlar karşılaştırılmalı olarak ayrıntılı incelenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_14926_7_pp_.pdf
  • 1
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Axelrod, R. ve R. O. Keohane (1993). “Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions”, Ed. David A. Baldwin (1993), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 85-116.
Baldwin, D. A. (1993). “Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics”, Ed. David A. Baldwin (1993), Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, 3-29.
Breitmeier, H. ve ark. (1996a). The International Regimes Database as a Tool for the Study of International Cooperation, Working Papers, Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, no. WP-96-160, December 1996.
Breitmeier, H. ve ark. (1996b). International Regimes Database (IRD): Data Protocol, Working Papers, Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, no. WP-96-154, December 1996.
Chasek, P. (1997). “A Comparative Analysis of Multilateral Environmental Negotiations”, Group Decision and Negotiation, 6, 437-461.
Chasek, P. (2001a). Earth Negotiations: Analyzing Thirty Years of Environmental Diplomacy, New York: United Nations University Press.
Chasek, P. (2001b). “Scientific Uncertainty in Environmental Negotiations: The Responses of the Non-governmental Sector”, Ed. Ho-Won Jeong (2001), Global Environmental Policies: Institutions and Procedures, Palgrave Pub: New York, 129-161.
Cox, R.W. (1986). “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, Ed. R. Keohane (1986), Neorealizm and its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press.
Cox, R.W. (1992). “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory, in Richard and Little, Ed. Michael Smith (1992), Perspectives on World Politics, London: Routledge Press.
ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 246 İİBF DERGİSİ
Efinger, M., P. Mayer, ve G. Schwazer (1993). Intergrating and Contextualizing Hypotheses: Alternatives Paths to Better Explanations of Regime Formation?”, Ed. Volker Rittberger (1993), Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Grieco, J. (1988). “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Insitutionalism”, International Organization, 42 (3), 485-507.
Haas, E. B. (1990). When Knowledge is Power, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Haas, P. M. (1989). “Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control”, International Organization, 43 (3), Summer 1989, 376-403.
Haas, P. M. (1992a). “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination”, International Organization, 46 (1), Winter 1992, 1-35.
Haas, P. M. (1992b). “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone”, International Organization, 46 (1), Winter 1992, 187-224.
Haas, P. M. (1993). “Epistemic Communities and the Dynamics of International Environmental Cooperation”, Ed. Volker Rittberger (1993), Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 168-202.
Haas, P. M. (1994). “Regime Patterns for Environmental Management”, in Complex Cooperation: Institution and Processes in International Resource Management, Peter M. Haas, vd., Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 35-59.
Haas, P. M., R. O. Keohane, ve M. A. Levy (1993). Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Haggard, S. ve B. A. Simmons (1987). “Theories of International Regimes”, International Organization, 41 (3), Summer 1987, 491-517.
NİSAN 2012 247
Hasenclever, A., P. Mayer ve V. Rittberger (1996). “Interests, Power, Knowledge: The Study of International Regimes”, Mershon International Studies Review, 40, 177-228.
Hasenclever, A., P. Mayer ve V. Rittberger (1997). Theories of International Regimes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jeong, H.-W. (2001). “Dynamics of Environmental Negotiations”, in Global Environmental Policies: Institutions and Procedures, Ho-Won Jeong, NY: Palgrave, 101-129.
Jonsson, C. (1993). “Cognitive Factors in Explaining Regime Dynamics”, Ed. Volker Rittberger, Regime Theory and International Relations (1993), Oxford: Clarendon Press, 202-223.
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O. ve J. S. Nye (1989). Power and Interdependence, İkinci basım, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
Krasner, S. D. (1983). “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables”, Ed. Stephen D. Krasner (1983), International Regimes, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1-23.
Kratochwil, F. V. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge Cambridgeshire and New York, Cambridge University Press
Kratochwil, F. V. ve J. Ruggie (1989). “The State of the Art, or the Art of the State“, International Organization, 40, 753–76.
Levy, M. A. (1994). The Study of International Regimes, Working Paper, Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, no. 94-113, November 1994.
ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ 248 İİBF DERGİSİ
List, M. ve V. Rittberger (1998). “The Role of Intergovernmental Organizations in Regime Formation and Evolution of International Environmental Regimes”, Ed. Arild Underdal (1998), The Politics of International Environmental Management, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 67-83.
Oye K.A, 1986 Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies, Ed. Kenneth A. Oye (1986), The Cooperation under Anarchy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Perrin Sophie ve Thomas Bernauer (2009). International Regimes Formation Revisited: Explaining Ratification Behavior With Respect to Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution Agreements, DVPW Conference, Erişim Tarihi: 01 Kasım 2011.
https://www.dvpw.de/fileadmin/docs/Kongress2009/Paperroom/2009OEkonomie1...
Rittberger, V. (1993). Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rowlands, I. H. (1995). The Politics of Global Atmospheric Change, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Sjostedt, G. (1994). “Issue Clarification and the Role of Consensual Knowledge in the UNCED Process”, Ed. Bertram I. Spector, Gunnar Sjostedt, ve William Zartman (1994), Negotiating International Regimes: Lessons Learned From the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), London: Graham Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff, 63-86.
Snidal, D. (1985). "The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory." International Organization 39 (4): 579-615.
Spector, B. I., G. Sjostedt, ve W. Zartman (1994). “The Dynamics of Regime-building Negotiations”, in Negotiating International Regimes: Lessons Learned From the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Ed. Bertram I. Spector, Gunnar Sjostedt, ve William Zartman (1994), London: Graham Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff, 3-21.
NİSAN 2012 249
Sprinz, D. ve T.Vaahtoranta (1998). “The Interest-Based Explanation for International Air Pollution Control”, Ed. Arild Underdal (1998), The Politics of International Environmental Management, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 13-41.
Stein, A. A. (1990). Why Nations Cooperate: Circumstance and Choice in International Relations, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Strange, S. (1983). “Cave! hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis”, Ed. Stephen D. Krasner (1983), International Regimes, Ithaca: NY: Cornell University Pres, 337-354.
Young, O. R. (1989). “The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment”, International Organization, 43 (3), Summer 1989, 349-375.
Young, O. R. ve G. Osherenko (1993a). “Testing Theories of Regime Formation: Findings from a Large Collaborative Research Project”, Ed. Volker Rittberger (1993), Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 223-252.
Young, O. R. ve G. Osherenko (1993b). “The Formation of International Regimes: Hypotheses and Cases”, Ed. Oran R. Young ve Gail Osherenko (1993), Polar Politics: Creating International Environmental Regimes,., Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1-22.
Young, O. R. (1994). International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society, Cornell University Press, Ithaca: NY.
Young, O. R. (1998). Creating Regimes: Arctic Accords and International Governance, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics, United States: McGraw-Hill.
Wendt, A. (1987). "The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory", International Organization, 41 (3), 335-370.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com