You are here

Home » Content

Karl Marx ve Ralf Dahrendorf: Sınıf Oluşumu ve Çatışma Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Bakış Açısı

Karl Marx and Ralf Dahrendorf: A Comparative Perspective on Class Formation and Conflict

Journal Name:

  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study addresses the concepts of class formation and conflict as defined by the classical social theorist, Karl Marx and the contemporary social theorist, Ralf Dahrendorf. Both social theorists are pioneering members of the same sociological tradition called the “conflict” perspective. It is rather appropriate to indicate that Marx is the founding father of Conflict Theory and that his work had a strong influence on that of Dahrendorf in almost every respect, providing Dahrendorf with the stepping‐stones from which to build new theoretical ideas. Within this context, this study first outlines the concepts of both social theorists. Then it deals with what the two perspectives share in common and compares the differences between them. Finally, it discusses how Marx’s theories influenced Dahrendorf.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, klasik sosyal kuramcı Karl Marx ve çağdaş sosyal kuramcı Ralf Dahrendorf tarafından tanımlanan sınıf oluşumu ve çatışmayı ele almaktadır. Bu çalışmada, bu iki sosyal teorisyenin sınıf oluşumu ve çatışma kuramlarındaki benzerlikler ve farklılıklar incelenmektedir. Bilindiği üzere, her iki kuramcı da aynı sosyolojik gelenek olan “çatışma’ kuramının öncülerindedir. Marx'ın tartışmasız olarak, çatışma teorisinin kurucusu olduğunu söylemek pek yanlış olmaz. Ayrıca, hiç şüphe yoktur ki, Marx’in çalışmalarının hemen hemen her alanda, çatışma kuramcısı olan Dahrendof’u etkilediği ve çalışmalarının köşe taşı olduğu aşikardır. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmada aynı zamanda, Karl Marx'ın, Ralf Dahrendorf’un sınıf oluşumu ve çatışma teorisi üzerindeki etkisi tartışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-karl-marx-ralf-dahrendorf-sinif-olusumu-catisma-uzerine-karsilastirmali-bir-bakis-acisi.pdf
  • 2
151
167
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Ashley, D. and Orenstein, D. M. (1998), Sociological Theory: Classical Statements,
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Aspers, P. (2010), “Alfred Marshall and The Concept of Class”, American Journal of
Economics and Sociology, 69(1), 151‐165.
Barteck, L. and Mullin, K. (1995), Enduring Issues in Sociology: Opposing Viewpoints,
CA: Greenhaven Press.
Coser, L. A. (1956), The Functions of Social Conflict, New York: The Free Press.
Coser, L. A. (1977), Masters of Sociological Thought, New York: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich.
Dahrendorf, R. (1958), “Toward A Theory of Social Conflict”, The Journal of Conflict
Resolution, 2 (2), 170‐183.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959a), Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, California:
Stanford University Press.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959b), “Power Division as The Basis of Class Conflict”, Ed. R.
Collins, Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings, Oxford University Press.
Foster, J. (2010), “The aristocracy of Labour and Working‐Class Consciousness
Revisited”, Labour History Review, 75(3), 245‐262.
Girdner, E. J. (2006), “Neoliberalism and Class Formation on A Global Scale”, Nature,
Society, and Thought, 2(19), 225‐232.
Hanieh, A. (2010), “Khaleeji‐Capital: Class‐Formation and Regional Integration in
The Middle‐East Gulf”, Historical Materialism, 18, 35‐76.
Hazelrigg, L. E. (1972), “Class, Property, and Authority: Dahrendorf's Critique of
Marx's Theory of Class”, Social Forces, 50 (4), 473‐487.
Lachmann, R. (2002), “Comparisons within A Single Social Formation: A Critical
Appreciation of Perry Anderson’s Lineages of The Absolutist State”, Qualitative
Sociology, 25(1), 83‐92.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1845), The German İdeology, New York: International
Publishers.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1848), The Communist Manifesto, New York: Signet Classic.
Marx, K. (1850), “The Class Struggle in France, 1848 to 1850”,
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works, (Erişim: 17.11.2009).
AĞUSTOS 2014
167
Marx, K. (1852), “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte”,
www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1852/18th‐brumaire/ch07.htm, (Erişim:
11.11.2009).
Marx, K. (1859), A Contribution to The Critique of Political Economy, New York:
International Publishers.
Marx, K. (1875), “Critique of the Gotha Programme”, http://www.marxists.org/
archive/marx/works, (Erişim: 16.11.2009).
Marx, K. (1989), “Critique of the Gotha Programme by Karl Marx with the Appendices
by Marx, Engels and Lenin”, New York: International Publisher Co., Inc.
Marx, K. (1894), “Capital, Volume III.”, http://www.marxists.org/archive/
marx/works, (Erişim: 09.11.2009).
Robinson, W.I. and Harris, J. (2000), “Towards A Global Ruling Class? Globalization
and The Transnational Capitalist Class”, Science & Society, 64(1), 11‐54.
Robinson, R. V. and Kelley, J. (1979), “Class as Conceived by Marx and Dahrendorf:
Effects on Income Inequality and Politics in The United States and Great Britain”,
American Sociological Review, 44(1), 38‐58.
Sprey, J. (1969), “The Family as A System in Conflict”, Journal of Marriage and
the Family, 31, 699‐706.
Straus, M.A.(1979), “Measuring Intrafamily Conflict and Violence: The Conflict
Tactics (CT) Scales”, Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(1), 75‐88.
Tucker, R. C. (1978), Marx‐Engels Readers, New York: W.W. Norton &Company
Ltd.
Weingart, P. (1969), “Beyond Parsons? A Critique of Ralf Dahrendorf's Conflict
Theory”, Social Forces, 48(2), 151‐165.
Wright, E. O. (2002), “The Shadow of Exploitation in Weber’s Class Analysis”,
American Sociological Review, 67, 832‐853.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com