You are here

Hankel's Transform and Rieman's Hypothesis

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name

AMS Codes:

Abstract (2. Language): 
A necessary and sufficient condition for validity of Rieman’s hypothesis is given in terms of the growth of Hankel’s transform of a function closely related to the classical ζ-function.
1113-1117

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] H Bateman and A Erdélyi. Higher transcendental functions, II. MC-Graw-Hill Book Company,
N. Y., 1953.
[2] K Chandrasekharan. Introduction to analytic number theory. Springer, 1968.
[3] H Davenport. Multiplicative number theory. Markham Publishing Company, 1967.
[4] E Hille. Contribution to the theory of Hermitian series: II. The representation problem.
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 47:80–94, 1940.
[5] H Polard. Representation of an analytic function by a Laguerre series. Annals of Mathe-
matics, 48: No 2, 358–365, 1947.
[6] P K Rusev. On the representation of analytic functions by Laguerre series. Dokl. Akad.
Nauk SSSR, 240: No. 5, 713–715, 1978.
[7] Petar K Rusev. Hankel’s transform and series in Laguerre polynomials. In PLISKA, Studia
mathematica bulgarica, 4:10–14, Sofia, 1981.
[8] P Rusev Classical orthogonal polynomials and their associated functions in complex do-
main. Bulgarian Academic Monographs (10), Marin Drinov Academic Publishing House,
Sofia, 2005.
[9] S Saks and A Zygmund. Analytic functions. Monografie matematyczne, Vol. XXVIII,
Warszawa-Wroclaw, 1952.
[10] O Százs and N Yeardley. The representation of an analytic function by general Laguerre
series. Pacific J. Math., 8: No 3, 621-633, 1958.
[11] G Szegö. Orthogonal polynomials. AMS Colloquium Publications 23, 1939.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com