You are here

Koroner Arter Bypass Reoperasyonlarında Sağ internal Torasik Arter Kullanımı

The Use of Right Internal Thoracic Artery in Coronary Artery Bypass Reoperations

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective: Internal thoracic artery (ITA) is the graft of choice in coronary artery bypass (CABG operations) due to its advantages in survival, ischemia recurrence and need for reintervention. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed our CABG reoperations with right ITA (RITA). Materials and Methods: Only the patients who had RITA graft in coronary revascularizations were enrolled in this study (n=12). Eleven patients (91.6%) were female and one male (8.4%). The average age of the patients was 57.4±5.9 (ranged, 48-66). The average duration of first and second CABG was 5.1±1.4 years (ranged, 1-6). Eight patients were operated off-pump. The mean duration of postoperative follow up was 5.0±1.9 years (ranged, 1.2-7.3) (total of 59.6 patient/years). Results: There was no in-hospital death. The average durations of intensive care and hospital stays were 1.3±0.5 days (ranged, 1-2) and 6.2±1.5 days (ranged, 5-9). The mean NYHA functional capacity of the patients in the follow-up was 1.3±0.5 (ranged, Class 1-2). The difference was statistically significant (p=0.045). There was only one long term mortality during the follow-up. Conclusion: ITA grafts should be preferred in the era of increasing CABG reoperations. Considering that the left ITA is used frequently in the initial operations, RITA should be the first graft of choice in the reoperations. The use of this graft does not cause increased mortality or morbidity
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: internal torasik arter (İTA); sağ kalım, iskemi rekürensi ve yeni koroner girişim ihtiyacı açısından belirgin üstünlüğü nedeniyle koroner arter bypass (KABG) ameliyatlarında sıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada sağ İTA (RİTA) grefti kullanılarak yapılan KABG reoperasyonları geriye dönük olarak analiz ettik. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya koroner reoperasyonlarda RİTA grefti kullanılan hastalar dâhil edilmiştir (n=12). Hastaların kadın (%91.6) ve biri erkek idi (%8.4). Hastaların ortalama yaşı 57.4±5.9 (48-66 arasında) idi. İlk KABG ameliyatı ile reoperasyon arasındaki ortalama süre 5.1±1.4 yıl (1-6 yıl arasında) idi. Hastaların 8'i atan kalpte ameliyat edildi. Hastalar ortalama olarak 5.0±1.9 yıl (1.2-7.3 yıl arasında) takip edildi (toplam 59.6 hasta/yıl). Bulgular: Hiçbir hastada mortalite görülmedi. Ameliyat sonrası hastaların yoğun bakım ve hastane kalış süreleri sırasıyla ortalama 1.3±0.5 (1-2 gün arası) ve 6.2±1.5 (5-9 gün arası) oldu. Taburculuk sonrası kontrollerinde hastaların ortalama NYHA kapasiteleri 1.3±0.5 (Class 1-2 arasında) idi. Preoperatif dönemle karşılaştırıldığında aradaki fark anlamlı kabul edildi (p=0.045). Hastaların ameliyat sonrası takiplerinde tek bir hastada geç mortalite oldu. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, KABG reoperasyonlarının arttığı bu dönemde hastaların sağ kalımına olumlu etkisi olan İTA grefti tercih edilmelidir. Günü¬ müzde ilk ameliyatlarda LİTA greftinin büyük bir oranda kullanıldığı düşünülürse, reoperasyonlarda ilk tercih RİTA grefti olmaktadır. Bu greftin kullanılması ameliyat döneminde ek bir mortalite veya morbidite getirmemektedir.
70-73

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Di Mauro M, Iaco AL, Contini M, et al. Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: analysis of early and late outcomes.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 79: 81-87.
2. He GW, Acuff
TE
, Ryan WH, He YH, Mack MJ. Determinants of operative mortality in reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 110:
971-978.
3. Sabik JF, Lytle BW. Role of internal thoracic artery grafts in reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery. Ed. He GW. In Arterial grafting for coronary artery bypass surgery. p 269¬275. 2nd ed, 2006. Springer.
4. Tekümit H, Cenal AR, Tataroğlu C, Uzun K, Akıncı E. Early outcomes of cardiac reoperations: A seven tears of experience. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cer Derg 2009; 17: 145-150.
5. Dougenis D, Brown AH. Long term results of reoperations for recurrent angina with internal mammary artery versus saphenous vein grafts. Heart 1998; 80: 9-13.
6. Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, Kramer JR, et al. Late clinical and arteriographic results in 500 coronary artery reoperations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 81: 675-685.
Tekümit ve Ark.
n=12
7.0±3.8
(3-16
) 1.3±0.5 (1-2) 6.2±1.5 (5-9) 1 (8.3%) 1 (8.3%) 1 (8.3%) 1 (8.3%) 1 (8.3%) 1 (%8.3)
7. Mohr B, Kramer A. Left-sided myocardial revascularisation with bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery. In Ed. Gue-Wei He. Arterial grafting for coronary artery bypass surgery. p
130-147. 2nd ed, 2006, Springer.
8. Gardner TJ. Searching for the Second-Best Coronary Artery
Bypas
s Graft: Is It the Radial Artery? Circulation. 2007; 115:
678-680.
9. Fukui T, Tabata M, Manabe S, et al. Angiographic outcomes of right internal thoracic artery grafts in situ or free grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jul 25 [Epud ahead of print] (doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.
2009.05.033.
10. DP Taggart. Arterial or venous conduits for redo coronary artery bypass grafting? Heart 1998; 80; 1-2.
11. Lytle BW, McElroy D, McCarthy PM, et al. The influence of
arterial coronary bypass grafts on the mortality of coronary reoperations! J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107: 675-683.
12. Stawinski GV, Lytle BW. Coronary Artery Reoperations. In: Lawrance H. Cohn, ed. Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. p 711¬732. 3rd ed. 2008, McGraw-Hill; New York.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com