You are here

Home » Content

Posner Ders Tasarım Modeli Işığında İngilizce Ders Tasarımının Geliştirilmesi

Developing An English CourseThrough Posner’s Course Design Model

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, the authors, first, have focused on the course design, its elements and the differences among these elements; second, they have explained Posner’s Course Design Model and finally gave an example of the design model. The sample design has been prepared for Elementary level Prep Class students and it consistsof a whole course with all its units. This model works as a guide for teachers and every teacher can develop his own course design regarding his circumstances and bydoing the necessary analyses.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada ilk olarak ders tasarımının temel unsurlarıile bu unsurlar arasındaki farklar üzerinde durulmuş, sonrasında Posner’ın Ders Tasarım Modeli ile bileşenleri adım adım açıklanarak örnek bir ders tasarımıoluşturulmuştur. Bu çalışmada söz konusu ders tasarımımodeli ele alınarak hazırlanan ders İngilizce Hazırlık sınıfı başlangıç (elementary) sevideki öğrencilere yönelik örnek ders ve ünitelerden oluşmaktadır. Bu model öğretmenlere rehber niteliğindedir ve her öğretmen kendi koşullarına uygun gerekli analizleri de yaparak kendi ders tasarımınıgeliştirebilir
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-posner-ders-tasarim-modeli-isiginda-ingilizce-ders-tasariminin-gelistirilmesi.pdf
  • 3
37-50
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Arends, R. I. (2001). Learning to Teach. USA: Mc Graw Hill.
Ertmer, P. A. ve Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism:
comparing critical features from aninstructional design perspective.
Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6 (4), 50-72.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı3 (2007)37-50 50
Dick, W., Carey, L. ve Carey, J. O. (2001). The Systematic Design of Instruction. New
York: HarperCollins.
Gustafson, K.L., Branch, R. M. (1997). Revisioning Models of Instructional
Development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3),
73- 89.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., ve Kemp, J.E., (2004). Designing Effective Instruction.
US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kiraz, E, Hardal, Ö. Akdag, Z. ve Güzel, C.I. (2004) Designing an Instruction or Using
A Designed Instruction: Critiquing the Teachers’ Instructional Design
Approach. Conference on Quality in Education in the Balkan Countries,
Sofia, 1-4 July, Bulgaria.
Posner, G. J, Rudnitsky, A. N (2001) Course Design: A guide to Curriculum
Development for Teachers. USA: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Smith P. L. and Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional Design. New York: Merrill.
Tyler, R.W. (1971). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. London: The
University of Chicago Press.
Winn, W. (2004). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. Yayımlandığıkitap D.J.
Jonassen (Editör), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications
and Technology, 2nd ed. (79-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com