You are here

Home » Content

Eğitimcilerin Araştırmaya Dayalı Öğrenme Yaklaşımıyla İlgili Algıları

The Perceptions of Educators on Inquiry-Based Learning Approach

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
In the study, the perceptions of educators charged in primary schools on the characteristics and instructional implementation of IBL approach were examined. The study was conducted on 170 educators charged 14 primary schools in Elmadağ, Ankara in Spring 2006-2007. In the study, the survey method was used as an investigation model because of trying to get the perception levels of educators charged in primary schools about the IBL approach. At the end of the study, it was determined that classroom teachers and subject teachers have higher perception levels than administrators about IBL approach. Moreover, itwas found that women have higher perception levels than men on IBL approach and there is a negative relationship between educators’ proffessional experience andtheir perception levels.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Araştırmada, ilköğretim okullarında görev yapan eğitimcilerin araştırmaya dayalıöğrenme (ADÖ) yaklaşımının özellikleri ve eğitimsel uygulamalarıyla ilgili algılarıincelenmiştir. Araştırma, 2006-2007 eğitim-öğretim yılında, Ankara ili Elmadağilçesinde bulunan 14 ilköğretim okulunda görev yapmakta olan 170 eğitimci üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada, ilköğretim okullarında görev yapan eğitimcilerin ADÖ yaklaşımıkonusundaki algıdüzeyleri tespit edilmeye çalışıldığıiçin araştırma modeli olarak tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda, sınıf ve branşöğretmenlerinin ADÖ yaklaşımıkonusundaki algıları idarecilerinkinden daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, bayanların ADÖ yaklaşımıyla ilgili algıdüzeylerinin erkeklere göre daha yüksek olduğu ve eğitimcilerin mesleki kıdemleri ile algı düzeyleri arasında negatif yönlü anlamlıbir ilişki tespit edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-egitimcilerin-arastirmaya-dayali-ogrenme-yaklasimiyla-ilgili-algilari.pdf
  • 1
153-170
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Açıkgöz, K. (2005). Etkili Öğrenme ve Öğretme. İzmir: Eğitim DünyasıYayınları.
AL (Alberta Learning). (2004). Focus on Inquiry : A Teacher’s Guide to Implementing
Inquiry-Based Learning. Edmonton: Canada.
Bonner, J. J. (2005). Which scientific method should we teach & When? The American
Biology Teacher. 67(5) 262-264.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A
Yayıncılık.
Carin, A. A. and J. E. Bass. (2001). Teaching Science As Inquiry. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River.
Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope. (Special issue) 42-44.
Elmore, R. F. (1996 ). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard
Educational Review. 66(1) 1-25.
Hess, F.M., R. Maranto and S. Milliman. (2000). Resistance in the trenches: What
shapes teachers’ attitudes toward school change? Educational Policy. 14(2)
195-213.
Ikpeze, C. H. and F. B. Boyd. (2007). Web-based inquiry learning: Facilitating
thoughtful literacy with WebQuests. International Reading Association. 644-654
Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Keller, J. T. (2001). From Theory to Practice Creating an Inquiry-Based Science
Classroom. Master Dissertation.Pasific Lutheran University.
Lawson, E. A. (1982). The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 19(9) 743–760.
Lim, B. R. (2001). Guidelines for Designing Inquiry-Based Learning on the Web:
Online Professional Development of Educators. Ph.D Thesis. Indiana
University.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 28, Sayı1 (2008) 153-170 168
Llewellyn, D. (2002). Inquiry Within: Implementing Inquiry-Based Science Standarts.
USA: Corwinn Pres, Inc. A Sage Publications Company.
Luke, C. L. (2004). Inquiry-Based Learning in a University Spanish Class: An
Evaluative Case Study of a CurricularImplementation. Ph.D Thesis. Texas
University.
Manlove, S., A.W. Lazonder and T. DeJong. (2006). Regulative support for
collaborative scientific inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning. 22 87-98
MEB (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı). (2005). İlköğretim Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi 6-7. Sınıflar
Öğretim Programıve Kılavuzu. (Taslak Basım). Ankara: Devlet Kitapları
Müdürlüğü.
Oliver, R. (2007). Exploring an inquiry-based learning approach with first-year students
in a large undergraduate class. Innovations in Education and Teaching
International. 44(1) 3-15.
Orlich D. C., R. J. Harder, R.C. Callahan, D. P. Kauchak, R. A. Pendergrass, A. J.
Keogh and H. Gibson. (1990). Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Beter
Instruction. Toronto: D. C. Heath and Company.
Sardilli, S. L. (1998). The Use of a Web Site to Disperse Information on Discovery-Based Learning in Elementary Science Education. Marist College. ED436
365.
Spaulding, D. T. (2001). Stakeholder Perceptions of Inquiry-Based Instructional
Practies. Ph.D Thesis. Albany State University.
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Educational Psychology: Theory And Practice. Massachusetts:
Allyn and Bacon.
Staten, M. F. (1998). Action research study: A framework to help move teachers toward
an inquiry-based science teaching approach. ERIC ED 429049.
Supovitz, J., D. Mayer and J. Kahle. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional
practices: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the
context of systemic reform. Educational Policy. 14(3) 331-357.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 28, Sayı1 (2008) 153-170 169
Wallace, R. S. (1997). Structual Equation Model of the Relationships among Inquiry-Based Instruction, Attitudes Toward Science, Achievement in Science and
Gender. Northon Illinois University.
Wyatt, S. (2005) Extending inquiry-based learning to include original experimentation.
The Journal of General Education. 54(2) 83–89.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com