You are here

Home » Content

BATI BALKANLARIN ENTEGRASYONUNUN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ: KARADAĞ VE SIRBİSTAN ÖRNEKLERİ

COMPARATİVE ANALYSİS OF INTEGRATION OF WESTERN BALKANS: MONTENEGRO AND SERBİA EXAMPLES

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The breakup of Yugoslavia meant the tranformation of Western Balkans which is in the process of European Integration. European integration process of Montenegro and Serbia has been examined in this study; it has been examined in historical integrity and diversity of this transformation. EU has been primarily explained by theories of EU integration process. The meaning of EU, its goals and its possible scenario in the future are also explained. Despite several reforms in Montenegro and Serbia, results which these countries have achieved seem to be insufficient for EU accession. According to European Commission Progress Report, Montenegro and Serbia's reforms are insufficient. The main reasons for the failure are inefficiency of institutions, lack of administrative capacities of judiciary, insufficient responsibilityof officials who are responsible for administrative reforms. Problems in the field of reforms are identified as the threatfor the rule of law. In addition, Montenegro and Serbia's EU accession process has main difficulties because the Montenegrin government has not been changed in twenty-five years long period. Also, Serbia refuses to improve its relations with Kosovo and its cooperation with the Hague Tribunal has to be much better.Because of all these reasons these countries can’t fulfill all tasks on their way to EU. The purpose of this study is to analyze these reasons and challenges.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yugoslavya’nın dağılması Avrupa Birliği Entegrasyon sürecinde olan Batı Balkan bölgesini dönüşüme uğratmıştır. Çalışmamızda Karadağ ve Sırbistan’ın Avrupa entegrasyon süreci bu dönüşümün tarihsel bütünlüğü ve farklılıkları içerisinde incelenmiştir. Öncelikle AB entegrasyon süreci teorilerle açıklanarak; AB’nin anlamı, hedefleri ve gelecekte alacağı görüntü betimlenmiştir. Yapılan incelemeler neticesinde Karadağ ve Sırbistan’ın çeşitli reformlar yapmasına rağmen AB yolunda yetersiz kaldığı saptanmıştır. Avrupa Komisyonu İlerleme Raporu da bu bulguyu desteklemektedir. Karadağ ve Sırbistan’ın reformlar konusunda yetersiz ya da başarısız olmasının başlıca nedenleri ise,devlet kurumlarının verimsizliği, yargının idari kapasitesinin yetersizliği, kurumsal ve idari reformlar konusunda üst düzey yetkililerin sorumluluklarının yetersiz kalması ve reform sıkıntılarının, hukukun üstünlüğünü tehdit etmesi olarak saptanmıştır. Ayrıca Karadağ ve Sırbistan’ın AB’ye katılım sürecinde karşılaştıkları başlıca zorluklar da, Karadağ hükümetinin yirmi beş yıldır değişmemesi, Sırbistan’ın Kosova ile ilişkilerini düzeltememesi, Lahey Mahkemesi ile Sırbistan’ın işbirliğine varamaması ve Karadağ ve Sırbistan AB yolunda reformları iyileştirememesi olarak gösterilebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı ise sıralanan bu nedenleri ve zorlukları analiz edip açıklamaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon c2s3m5.pdf
  • 3
75
90
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

BERKUM, Siemen van, Bogdanov, Natalija (2012). Serbia on the Road to EU Accession:
Consequences for Agricultural Policy and the Agri-food Chain, Wallingford, Cambridge,
CABI,
BROWN, Chris, with AİNLEY, Kirsten(2005). Understanding International Relations,
Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, New York,
BURCHİLL, Scott (2005). Theories of International Relations, Palgrave Macmillan,
Basingstoke, New York,
BUDIMIR, Branko(2013). Sırbistan'ın Avrupa Birliği'ne katılma Kılavuzu, ISAC fond,
Belgrat,
DRAGNIĆ, Ranko(2009). Ürün Güvenliği ve Avrupa Birliği, Akademska misao, Beograd,
ĐURIĆ, Bojan(2007). Odnos birača i apstinenata prema Haškom tribunalu i pomirenju, u:
Birači i apstinenti u Srbiji, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi, Enstitü açık
topluluğu için, Belgrat,
GJOSEVSKA, Bisera, Karanovic, Goran (2014). A Comparison of Policy Responses to the
Global Economic Crisis in the Balkans: Acceding Versus EU Candidate Countries, in:
Karasavvoglou Anastasios, Polychronidou, Persefoni(editors), Economic Crisis in Europe and
the Balkans: Problems and Prospects, Heidelberg, Springer.
JANO, Dorian, (2010). The Europeanization of Western Balkans: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative
Comparative Analysis of the New Potential EU Member States, Saarbrücken, VDM Verlag Dr.
Müller.
Avrupa Entegrasyonu Ulusal Konseyi'nin kurulmasına ilişkin kararı, Madde 1, Karadağ Resmi
Gazete'de, 22/08.
KOPRİVİCA, Nenad(2012). Influence of International Actors on the Work of the Parliament
of Montenegro, in: Comparative Analyses of Democratic Performances of Parliaments of
Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro, University of Belgrade – Faculty of Political
Sciences (Centre for Democracy), Sarajevo Open Centre, Faculty of Political Science –
University of Montenegro, Belgrade, Sarajevo, Podgorica.
KUMAR, Andrej(2007). Kandžija, Vinko, EU enlargement impacts–Theory and evidence, in:
Economic Integration, Competition and Cooperation, Faculty of Economics, Rijeka.
MİLES, Lee(1995). European integration and enlarging of the European Union: a theoretical
perspective, presented at the Fourth Biennial International Conference of the European
Community Studies Association, Charleston.
Open Parliament, bulletin of the Parliament of Montenegro, year II, No. 18.
PAGDEN, Anthony (2002). The idea of Europe, From Antiquity to the European Union,
Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.
Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Vol/Cilt:2, No/Sayı:3, 2015
90
SCHİMMELFENNİG, Frank(2002). Sedelmeier, Ulrich, Theorizing EU enlargement: research
focus, hypotheses, and the state of research, in: Journal of European Public Policy, Routledge,
London and New York.
SCHİMMELFENNİG and ULRİCH Sedelmeier(2015). The Politics of the European Union
Enlargement: Theoretical Approaches, edited by Frank, Routledge, London and New York.
SFRY Anayasası,Ssosyalist cumhuriyetler ve İllerin anayasaları(1974). Prosveta, Belgrat.
Serbia Progress Report(2014). European Commission, Brussels, October.
WENDT, Alexander(2003). Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne.
WİENER, Antje, Diez, Thomas (2009) European Integration Theory, Oxford University Press,
Oxford, New York.
VUJOVİĆ, Zlatko(2013). Vukićević, Boris, Ružić, Nataša, Koprivica, Nenad, Muk, Stevo,
Study: Strengthening of the Role and Function of the Parliament of Montenegro in the Decision-
Making Process-Recommendations for improvement, University of Montenegro, Faculty of
Political Science.
VUKİĆEVİĆ, Boris(2012). Legislative Function of the Parliament of Montenegro, in:
Comparative Analyses of Democratic Performances of Parliaments of Serbia, Bosnia and
Herzegovina and Montenegro, University of Belgrade-Faculty of Political Sciences (Centre for
Democracy), Sarajevo Open Centre, Faculty of Political Science-University of Montenegro,
Belgrade, Sarajevo, Podgorica.
2008-2012 dönemi için Karadağ Entegrasyon için Ulusal Programı, Karadağ Hükümeti,
Podgorica, 2008.
http://www. slobodnaevropa.org /content/srbija-otvorila-predpristupne-prgovoresaeu/
25236727.html, erişim tarihi: 02.03.2015.
http://www.neurope.eu/article/juncker-commission-no-further-eu-enlargement, erişim
tarihi: 12.03.2015.
http://balkans.aljazeera.net/vijesti/mrkic-srbija-nece-clanstvo-u-nato-u, erişim tarihi:
05.03.2015.
http://evropskikutak.me/sr/evropska-unija/fondovi-evropske-unije, erişim tarihi: 08.03.2015.
http://www.delmne.ec.europa.eu/code/navigate.php?Id=59, erişim tarihi: 12.03.2015.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com