You are here

Home » Content

Pazarı Olmayan Varlıklara Yönelik Bir Kıymetlendirme Metodu: Ödeme İsteği

A Non-Market Valuation Method: Contingent Valuation (Willingness-to-Pay)

Journal Name:

  • Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study reviews the most recent theories concerning the non-market valuation methods. After briefly reviewing Hedonic pricing, Travel Cost, and Random Utility Models, "Willingness to Pay" (WTP) and "Willingness to Accept" (WTA) approaches are explained in detail. The economic and statistical models for WTP and WTA approaches are discussed. Statistical tests that can be used in the models are explained briefly. The model was applied to forested wetlands in the Tensas River basin. According to the results obtained, the households in the region are willing to pay $44.00.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, Pazardışı kıymetlendirme metodlan ile ilgili en son teorileri tetkik etmektedir. Hoşnutluk Fiyatlandırması, Seyahat Masrafı ve Tesadüfi Fayda Metodlan kısaca anlatıldıktan sonra "Ödeme İsteği" ve "Kabullenme İsteği" Yaklaşımları detaylı bir şekilde açıklanmaktadır. Ödeme İsteği ve Kabullenme İsteği için kullanılan ekonomik ve istatistiki yaklaşımlar tartışılmaktadır. Modellerde kullanılan istatistiki testler kısaca açıklanmaktadır. Model Tensas nehri havzasında ormana dönüştürülen sulak alanlara uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre bölgedeki hanehalkının ortalama ödeyebilme isteği 44 dolardır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159097_20_pp_61-68.pdf
  • 2
61-68
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Aldrich, J.H. and F.D. Nelson. 1984. Linear Probability,
Logit, and Probit Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Publications.
Carson, R.T., N. Flores, K. Martin, and J. Wright. 1996.
"Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference
Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-
Public Goods." Land Economics 72(1): 80-89.
Diamond, P.A., and J.A. Hausman. 1994. "Contingent
Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No
Number?" J. of Economic Perspectives 8: 45-64.
Freeman, A.M.. 1993. Hie Measurement of
Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and
Methods. Resources for the Future. Washington,
DC.
Hanemann, W.M. 1984. "Welfare Evaluations in
Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete
Responses." American Journal of Agricultural
Economics. 66: 332-341.
Hanemann, W.M. 1991. "Willingness to Pay and
Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They
Differ?" American Econ.Review 81(3): 635-647.
Hill, C. 1998. "Lectures in Econometrics JJ."
Unpublished.manuscripts. Department of
Economics, Louisiana State University.
Isaacs, J.C. 1998. "A Conceptual and ETrrpirical Approach
for Valuing biodiversity: An estimate of the
Benefits of Plant and Wildlife Habitat Preservation
in the Tensas River Basin."Ph.D. Dissertation, Dpt.
of Ag.Econ.& Agribusiness, Louisiana State Univ.
Judge, G.C, R.C. Hill, WE. Griffiths, H. Lutkepohl, and
T. Lee. 1988. Introduction to the Theory and
Practice of Econometrics, second edition. NY: John
Maddala, G.S.
1983
. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. London, Cambridge University Press. Mansfield, E. 1991. Intermediate Microeconomics. New
York:W.W. Norton. Mitchel, R.C., and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Nelson, A.C. 1986. "Using Land Markets to Evaluate Urban Containment Programs." Journal of the American Planning Association, Spring, Vol. 52, no. 2, 156-171.
NOAA (1995). "Economic Valuation of Natural Resources. A handbook for Coastal Resource Policymakers". NOAA COASTAL OCEAN PROGRAM, Decision Analysis series No. 5. Portney, P.R. 1994. "The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care." Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 3-17. RandalL A. and J.R. Stoll, 1980. "Consumer's Surplus in Commodity Space." American Economic Review. 70:449-455.
Simpson, B. 1996. "Sustainability and Environmental Assessment: The Increasing Prominence of the Natural Environment in Development Decisions." Geography 81(3): 205-216. Simpson, RT>. 1998. "Economic Analysis and Ecosystems: Some Concepts and Issues." Ecological Applications 8(2): 342-349. Van Xooten, G.C. 1993. Land Resource Economics and Snstamable Development. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com