You are here

Su Stresinin Mahlep (Prunus mahaleb L.) Anaçlarında Biyokimyasal Değişimler Üzerine Etkileri

Effects of Water Stress on Biochemical Changes of Mahalep Rootstocks

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.13002/jafag4253

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The goal of this study was to determine the effect of water stress on biochemical changes of mahalep (Prunus mahaleb L.) rootstocks. For this purpose, three new seedling mahalep rootstocks and SL64 were used in this study. The rootstocks plants were planted into 40 liter pots with 1:2:1:0.5 ratio including sand:loam soil:peat:manure. During the experiment, four different stress levels of irrigation were applied to all rootstocks (S1: the soil was fully irrigated to reach field capacity in each irrigation, the irrigation levels of S2, S3 and S4 treatments; were % 75, % 50 and % 25 of irrigation water applied to S1 treatment). Chlorophyll content (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll), pH, abscisic acid (ABA), total sugar and total starch were investigated as biochemical changes. Water stresses decreased pH, chlorophyll and total starch content and increased abscisic acid and total sugar content.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırma, su stresinin mahlep anaçlarında, biyokimyasal içerikler üzerine etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada üç yeni mahlep anacı ile SL64 anacı kullanılmıştır. Bitkiler içinde 1:2:1:0,5 oranında kum:tınlı toprak:torf:çiftlik gübresi karışımı olan 40 litrelik saksılara dikilmiştir. Araştırmada; su kısıtı denemelerinde dört farklı sulama konusu uygulanmıştır (S1= Eksik nemin tarla kapasitesine getirilmesi, S2= S1 konusuna verilen suyun % 70 oranında uygulanması, S3=S1 konusuna verilen suyun % 40 oranında uygulanması, S4=S1 konusuna verilen suyun % 10 oranında uygulanması). Su stresinin yapraklarda klorofil (klorofil-a, klorofil-b ve toplam klorofil), pH, Absisik asit (ABA), toplam şeker ve toplam nişasta içeriği üzerine etkileri incelenmiştir. Su kısıtına bağlı olarak, yaprakta klorofil-a, klorofil-b, toplam klorofil, toplam nişasta ve pH miktarında azalma, ABA ve toplam şeker miktarlarında ise artış belirlenmiştir.
1
10

REFERENCES

References: 

Aharoni N, Blumenfeld A and Richmond AE (1977).
Hormonal Activity in Detacted Lettuce Leaves as
Affected by Leaf Water Content. Plant Physiol. 59:
1169-1173.
Altunbey H (2005). Fasulyenin Tam ve Yarı Islatmalı
Toprakaltı Damla Sulamaya Tepkisi. Sütçü İmam
Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Tarımsal Yapılar
8
ÖZYURT VE AKÇA / JAFAG (2017) 34 (3), 1-10
ve Sulama Anabilim Dalı. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 43 s.
Kahramanmaraş.
Anju S, Thakur PS and Dwived MP (1994). Rapid
Evaluation off Apple Varieties for Drought Tolerance.
Dep. Bas. Sci., Hort.- Fore. Univ., 51 : 16-21,
Hindistan.
Barlow, Ewr, Boersmal and Young JL (1976). Root
temprature and soil water potential on growth and
soluble carbonhydrate concentration of corn seedlings.
Crop Science, 16: 59-62.
Blum A (1986). Breeding crop varieties for stress
environments. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 2:199-23.
Boyer JS (1976). Water Deficits and Plant Growth.
Vol.IV. (Ed.T.T. Kozlowski) Academic Press. New
York, 153-190.
Chaves MM (1991). Effects of Water Deficits on Carbon
Assimilation, J.Exp.Bot. 42:1-16.
Çırak C ve Esendal E (2006). Soyada Kuraklık Stresi.
OMÜ Zir. Fak. Dergisi, 21(2): 231-237.
Davies WJ, Bacon MA, Thompson DS, Sobeih W, and
González Rodríguez L (2000). Regulation of Leaf and
Fruit Growth in Plants Growing in Drying Soil:
Exploitation of the Plants’ Chemical Signalling Sytem
and Hydraulic Architecture to Increase the Efficiency
of Water Use in Agriculture. J. of Exp. Bot., 350:
1617-1626.
Demirtaş MN ve Kırnak H (2009). Kayısıda farklı
sulama yöntemleri ve aralıklarının fizyolojik
parametrelere etkisi. YYÜ Tarım Bilim Dergisi. 19:
79-83.
Düzdemir O, Ünlükara A ve Kurunç A (2009). Response
of cowpea to salinity and irrigation regims. New
Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science,
Vol. 37:271-280.
Dwivedi RS, Sirvastava KK, Solomon S and Singh K
(1988). Rapid Test For Drought Resistance in
Sugarcanes Spring Suppl., 31-32.
Ecem N (2010). Farklı Mısır (Zea mays L.) Çeşit Vve
Hatlarında Kuraklık Stresi Etkilerinin Fizyolojik
Olarak İncelenmesi. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Fen
Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Sakarya.
Foyer CH (1988). Feedback inhibition of photosynthesis
through source- sink regulation. Plant Physiology and
Biochemistry.
Fuhrt B and Lenz F (1989). Phyotosynthese von
Apfelblattern bei Untersciedlicher Wasserversorgung.
Mitt Klosterneuburg, 39: 191- 195.
Hansen J and Moller IB (1975). Anal Biochem 68: 87-94.
Jones MMG, Osmond CD and Turner NC, (1980).
Accumulation of solutes in leaves of sorghum and
sunflower in response to water deficts . Australian
Journal of Plant Physiology, 7: 193-205.
Kalefetoğlu T (2006). Çeşit Ve Hatlarının Kuraklık
Stresine Karşı Dayanıklılığının Karakterizasyonu,
Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Biyoloji
Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.
Kalefetoğlu T ve Ekmekçi Y (2005). Bitkilerde Kuraklık
Stresinin Etkileri Ve Dayanıklılık Mekanizmaları.
G.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 18(4): 723-740.
Kaya E (1999). Mahlep Çöğür Anaç Seleksiyonu Üzerinde
Araştırmalar. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Ziraat
Fakültesi, Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek
Lisans Tezi, Tokat.
Kaynaş N (1994). Bazı şeftali ve nektarin çeşitlerinde
kurağa mukavemetin fizyolojisi üzerinde araştırmalar.
Atatürk Bahçe Kültürleri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü,
Yalova.
Kaynaş N ve Eriş A (1998). Bazı Nektarin Çesitlerinde
Toprak Su Noksanlığının Biyokimyasal Degişimler
Üzerine Etkileri Tr. J. of Agriculture and Forestry 22:
35-41, Tübitak, Ankara.
Koshimizo K and Iwamura H (1986). Chemistry of Plant
Hormones. CRC Press Inc., 154-199, Florida.
Kramer PS and Kozlowski TT (1979). Physiology of
Woody Plants. Academic Press, 811, New York.
Küçükyumuk C, Yıldız H ve Ünlükara A (2014). Tuz
Stresinin Farklı Anaçlar Üzerine Aşılı Kirazın
Vejetatif Gelişimine Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi, Türkiye
Tarımsal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1: 154-161
Lewitt J (1980). Responses of Plants to Environmental
Strees. Water,Radition. Salt and Other Stress. Vol.II,
Academic Press. 607, New York.
Marshall (1986). Plant and Soil 52-54.
Meyer RF and Boyer JB (1981). Osmoregulation Solute
Distrubution and Growth in Soybean seedlings Having
Low Water Potantial. Planta 151: 482-489.
Milborrow BV (1981). The Physiology and Biochemistry
of Drought Resistance in Plants (Ed. L.G.Paleg and
D.Aspinall) Academic Press, 348-386, New York.
Morgan JM (1984) Osmoregulation and Water Stress in
Higher Plants. Ann.Rev.Plant Physiol. 35:299-319.
Munns R and Weir R (1981). Contribution of Sugars to
Osmotic Adjustment in Elongation and Explanded
Zones of Wheat Leaves During Moderate Water
Deficits at Two Light Levels. Aust. J.Plant Physiol. 8:
93-105.
Pelleschi S, Rocher JP and Prioul Jl, (1997). Effect of
water restriction on carbonhydrate metabolism and
photosynthesis in mature maize leaves, Plant Cell and
Environment , 20(4), 493-503
Pouyafard N, Akkuzu E ve Kaya Ü (2016). Kıyı Ege
Koşullarında Yetiştirilen Ayvalık Zeytin Fidanlarında
Su Stresine Bağlı Bazı Fizyolojik ve Morfolojik
Değişimlerin belirlenmesi Journal of Tekirdag
Agricultural Faculty. 13 (01): 88-98.
Ranney TG, Bassuk NL and Whitlow TM (1991). Osmotic
adjustment and solute constituents in leaves and roots
of water-stressed cherry (Prunus) trees. J. Am. Soc.
Hortic. Sci. 116: 684–688.
Robinson TL and Barrit, BH (1990). Endogenous Abscisic
Acid Concentrations. Vegetative Growth Relations of
Apple Seedlings Following PEG. Induced Water
Stress. J.Amer. Soc.Hort.Sci. 115: 991-999.
Souter A, Dietz KJ and Hartung W (2002). A possibsle
stress physiological role of abscisic acid conjugates in
root-to-shoot signalling, Plant, Cell and Environment,
25: 223–228.
Stewart CR (1971). Effect of wilting on carbonhydrates
during incubation of excised bean leaves in the dark,
Plant Physiology, 48 (6), 792-794
Trouverie J, Venot C, Rocher JP, Sotta B and Prıoul JL
(2003).The role of abscisic acid in the response of a
specific vacuolar invertase to water stress in the adult
maize leaf, J. Exp. Bot. 54, 2177– 2186.
Turner NC, Begg JE and Tonnet ML (1978). Osmotic
adjusment of sorghum and sunflower crops in
9
ÖZYURT VE AKÇA / JAFAG (2017) 34 (3), 1-10
response to water potential at which stomata close,
Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 5(5): 597-608.
Tyree MT (1976). Tree Physiology and Yied Improvement
(Ed. M.G.R.Cannel and F.T.Last). Academic Press,
329-348, New York.
Vardar Y (1972). Bitki Fizyolojisi Dersleri I. Bitkilerin
Metabolik Olayları. Ege Üniv.Zir.Fak.Ders Kitabı, 37:
332, İzmir.
Wang Z, Qubedeaux B and Stutte GW (1991). Osmotic
adjusment: effect on sucrose-phospHte synthase
activity in Phseolus vulgaris, Physiologia Plantarum,
81: 37-44.
Wenkert (1980). Measurement of Tissue Osmotic
Pressure1 United States Department of Agriculture,
2073 Neil Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210.
Wilkinson S and Davies WJ (2002). ABA-based chemical
signalling: the coordination of esponses to stress in
plants, Plant Cell Environ. 25: 195–210.
Withan FH, Blaydes DF and Devlin RM (1971).
Experiments in Plant Physiology, Van Nostrand
Reinhold Co., pp. 55-58, New York.
Xiloyannis C, Uriu K and Martin G.C (1980). Seasonal
and Diurnal Variations in Abscisic Acid, Water
Potential, and Diffusive Resistance in Leaves from
Irrigated and Non-irrigated Peach Tress.
J.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci. 105, 412-415.
Zinselmeġer C, Westgate ME, Schussler JR and Jones, RJ
(1995). Low water potential disrupts carbonhydrate
metabolism in maize (Zea Mays L.), Plant Physiology,
107,385-391.
10

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com