You are here

Farklı sabit protetik restorasyon maddelerinde bakteri tutunmasının incelenmesi

Evaluation of bacterial adhesion on fixed partial denture materials

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
Although improved oral hygiene and hygienic prosthetic restorations are prerequisites for a healthy state of periodontal tissues around dental restorations by impeding occurence of gingivitis and periodontitis, the surface characteristics of dental restorative materials can also present important factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adhesion of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (A.a) and Streptococus mutans (S.mutans), which are accepted to be the infectious agents, to current prosthetic restorative materials. The bacterial suspensions of A.a (ATCC 29523) and S.mutans (Refik Saydam culture collection 676) were prepared and the initial bacterial counts were determined by using a nephelometric method (UroQuick, Italy). Cr-Ni, In-Ceram, Empress 2 translucent, Ivoclar, Empress 2 dentin, Alphadur and Empress II ingot were used as prosthetic restorative materials to evaluate bacterial adhesion. These materials were placed in 24 well plates and sterile saliva, and bacteria were added. Specific broths for each strain were, then, transferred in well plates and incubated for the adhesion. The bacteria adhered to the surface of restorative materials were detached by sonification procedure and measured by nephelometric method. The viability of bacteria were evaluated in specific media. The procedure was repeated for three times and the mean of measurements were calculated. The measurement of viable bacteria count by culture method indicated that A.a adhered in small amounts on Cr-Ni surface and in higher amounts on In-Ceram and Empress 2 ingot surfaces. The highest S.mutans adherence was found on Empress 2 ingot, although S.mutans adhered to a lesser extent on all specimens when compared to A.a. Nephelometric measurement demonstrated that A.a adhered in small amounts on Alphadur and in higher amounts on Cr-Ni surface. The highest S.mutans adherence was measured on Empress 2 translucent, and the lowest on In-Ceram, Empress 2 dentin and Alphadur surfaces. The use of Cr-Ni can be suggested on teeth distant to esthetic zone or underneath ceramic materials due to less bacterial adhesion on this material when all prosthetic restorative materials were evaluated.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Dental restorasyonlar etrafındaki mukozanın sağlığının korunabilmesi ile gingivitis ve periyodontitisin gelişmemesi, her ne kadar hastanın oral hijyen alışkanlıkları, protetik restorasyonlarının hijyenik olması ve mikrobiyal dental plağın azlığına bağlı olsa da, diş hekimliğinde kullanılan restoratif materyallerin yüzey özellikleri de önemlidir. Bu çalışmada ağızda sıklıkla infeksiyon etkeni olarak kabul edilen Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (A.a) ve Streptococus mutans'ın (S.mutans), günümüzde sabit protetik restorasyonların yapımında kullanılan maddelere tutunmalarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. A.a (ATCC 29523) ve S. mutans (Refik Saydam Kültür Koleksiyonu 676) suşlarının belli oranda bakteri süspansiyonları hazırlandı ve başlangıç bakteri sayısını belirlemek amacıyla nefelometrik yöntemle (Uro-Quick, Italy) ölçümleri yapıldı. Bakteriyel tutunmayı belirlemek için, Cr- Ni, In-Ceram, Empress 2 translüsent, Ivoclar, Empress 2 Dentin, Alphadur, Empress 2 ingot sabit protetik restorasyon materyalleri kullanıldı. Bu materyaller 24 çukurlu hücre kültürü flasklarına alınarak üzerlerine steril tükrük ve bakteri ilave edildi. Araştırılan bakterilere özel sıvı besiyerleri kuyucuklara konularak, adezyon için inkübasyona bırakıldı. Yüzeylere tutunan bakteriler sonifikasyon işlemi ile koparılarak, yüzey başına tutunan bakteri sayısı nefelometrik yöntem ile ölçüldü. Bakteriler özel besi yerlerine ekilerek, canlılıkları tespit edildi. Bu deney üç kez tekrar edilerek, ölçümlerin ortalamaları alındı. Canlı bakteri sayısının kültür yöntemiyle ölçülmesi ile, A.a'nın en az Cr-Ni metal yüzeye, en yüksek In-Ceram ve Empress 2 ingot yüzeylere tutunduğu görüldü. S.mutans'ın A.a'ya göre araştırılan tüm yüzeylere daha az miktarda tutunduğu ve aynı zamanda en yüksek oranda Empress 2 ingot materyale tutunduğu izlendi. Nefelometrik inceleme ise, A.a nın en az Alphadur'a, en yüksek Cr- Ni'e tutunduğunu göstermiştir. S.mutans ise, en fazla Empres 2 translösent'e, en az ise In-Ceram, Empres 2 dentin ve Alphadur'a tutunmuştur. Tüm örnek yüzeyler bakteriyel tutunma açısından değerlendirildiğinde; Cr-Ni alaşımının estetik hattın dışındaki dişlerde kullanımı veya seramik materyallerin altında kullanılması önerilebilir.
251-255

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Siegrist BE, Brecx MC, Gusberti FA, Joss
A, Lang NP. In vivo early human dental
plaque formation on different supporting
substances. A scanning electron microscopic and bacteriological study. Clin Oral
Implants Res 1991; 2: 38-46.
2. Hannig M. Transmission electron microscopic study of in vivo pellicle formation on
dental restorative materials. Eur J Oral Sci
1997; 105: 422-433.
3. Sardin S, Morrier JJ, Benay G, Barsotti O.
In vitro streptococcal adherence on prosthetic and implant materials. Interactions
with physicochemical surface properties. J
Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 140-148.
4. Wallman C, Krasse B. Mutans streptococci
in margins of fillings and crows. J Dent
1992; 20: 163-166.
5. Prati C, Fava F, Di Gioia D, Selighini M,
Pashley DH. Antibacterial effectiveness of
dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 1993;
9: 338-343.
6. Satou J, Fukunaga A, Satou N, Shintani H,
Okuda K. Streptococcal adherence on various restorative materials J Dent Res 1988;
67: 588-591.
7. Suljak JP, Reid G, Wood SM, McConnell
RJ, van Der Mei HC, Busscher HJ.
Bacterial adhesion to dental amalgam and
three resin composites. J Dent 1995; 23:
171-176.
8. Carlen A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A,
Holmberg K, Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass
ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials
2001; 22: 481-487.
9. Guggenheim B, Giertsen W, Schupbach P,
Shapiro S. Validation of an in vitro biofilm
model of supragingival plaque. J Dent Res
2001; 80: 363-370.
10. Shahal Y, Steinberg D, Hirschfeld Z,
Bronshteyn M, Kopolovic K. In vitro bacterial adherence onto pellicle-coated aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil
1998; 25: 52-58.
11. Carranza FA. Clinical Periodontology. 7th
ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1990:
96.
12. Meyer DH, Fives-Taylor PM. Evidence
that extracellular components function in
adherence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans to epithelial cells. Infect
Immun 1993; 61: 4933-4936.
13. Meyer DH, Fives-Taylor PM. Characteristics of adherence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans to epithelial cells. Infect
Immun 1994; 62: 928-935.
14. Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, Pfister W.
Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous
flow system. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 278-
285.Cilt 47 · Sayý 4 · Gülhane TD Protetik materyallerde bakteriyel tutunma · 255
15. Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, et al.
Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials 2004, 25: 4457-4463.
16. Whittaker CJ, Klier CM, Kolenbrander PE.
Mechanisms of adhesion by oral bacteria.
Annu Rev Microbiol 1996; 50: 513-552.
17. Fives-Taylor P, Meyer D, Mintz K.
Characteristics of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans invasion of and adhesion
to cultured epithelial cells. Adv Dent Res
1995; 9: 55-62.
18. Gibbons RJ, Hay DI, Schlesinger DH.
Delineation of a segment of adsorbed salivary acidic proline-rich proteins which promotes adhesion of Streptococcus gordonii
to apatitic surfaces. Infect Immun 1991; 59:
2948-2954.
19. Tullberg A. An experimental study of the
adhesion of bacterial layers to some restorative dental materials. Scand J Dent Res
1986; 94: 164-173.
20. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of
surface roughness and surface-free energy
on supra- and subgingival plaque formation
in man. A review of the literature. J Clin
Periodontol 1995; 22: 1-14.
21. Kawai K, Takaoka T. Inhibition of bacterial
and glucan adherence to various lightcured fluoride-releasing restorative materials. J Dent 2001; 29: 119-122.
22. Yamauchi M, Yamamoto K, Wakabayashi
M, Kowano J. In vitro adherence of
microorganisms to denture base resin with
different surface texture. Dent Mater J
1990; 9: 19-24.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com